|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:27 PM Original message |
A little perspective here on Nevada: (R)--41,000 (D)--10,500 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's 10,500 delegates, not votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:28 PM Original message |
no, it's not delegates, it's precincts isn't it? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
4. votes equal 117k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. The GOP numbers are votes while the D numbers are delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Not doubting you, I just have been trying to get the turnout numbers all day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gdaerin (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. but that's not what it says on C-span |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Thank you. Even if these numbers are not apples and oranges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
3. That isn't right. MSNBC said more than 100,000 and in 04 it was 9,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. I would find it VERY hard to believe that 50,000 people left a caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. It is simply explained. The op's numbers for the dems were delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. Facts are a bitch..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. So be a part of the solution as opposed to a part of the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gdaerin (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
7. I can't believe therer were 4 times more repugs caucusing then Dems, how could that be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. it isn't, the numbers I've heard are 117,000 Dems to 30,000 'pukes n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gdaerin (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Oh ok, Thank god! Whew! I was worried there for a second! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:34 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. It isn't true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ursi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
9. Reid is claiming 100,000 turnout |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
featherman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
13. Not true... you're comparing apples to oranges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-19-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. See post #14 -- that is what I am trying to understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC