|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:19 AM Original message |
Poll question: Which candidate is most likely to hold Bush/Cheney accountable for crimes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
1. Where's Edwards and Kucinich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. They're not "electable", remember? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. Your are correct. I fear that the Democrats are about to ignore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. Holding them accountable would be holding the entire Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
3. NEITHER, I think only Kucinich would have the courage to do it (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
4. Umm, EDWARDS, dammit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Agree, I think he would also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
5. Neither. Nor will Edwards. Presidents historically do not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:28 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. No one mentioned impeachment, your candidate isn't off the hook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:31 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. True. And neither did I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. They are silent on the issue in the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. On what issue? Prosecuting Bush once in office? Not gonna happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
6. Neither. They'll both follow the Nancy Pelosi playbook. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmosh42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. You have the correct answer! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
9. niether-rule of law is a memory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rjones2818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
13. We know who's the only candidate calling for impeachment! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
14. Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
15. Come on Obama/Clinton supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
18. Kucinich, obviously. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
19. Everybody knows that those traitorous war criminal will walk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
22. Time for a kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC