Though JRE is my guy, and I think he won, I think it was unfair to make Hillary answer for Bill.
No one jumped Michelle or Elizabeth for any of their comments and frankly, though I understand that Bill is an ex Pres and carries more weight, I do not think it was right for Obama to make Hillary defend Bill.JMHO.
2. bill is a former us president and one of the highlights
of hillaries campaign. His former position and current actions place him at a much different level of noticability then michelle or liz. I think its right for hillary to answer for bill since alot of her campaign is "two for the price of one"
5. I disagree.I think 2 for 1 is a mistake but she shouldn't have to answer for him.
And I don't think she should be forced to.I think if Obama referrred to Bill as "her Campaign, or a "surrogate" it would have been less offensive.But hey JMHO.
9. Oh for chrissake a Former President is not the same as a spouse
Your hatred of Obama is inexplicable. Bill has been out there playing Hillary's hatchet man, 60% of her voters prefer Bill, he is absolutely fair game.
You've just chosen to believe the lies and have turned your support of Edwards into an irrational witch hunt of Obama. The only way to believe Edwards is better on the issues is to just completely ignore his entire Senate record.
Bill has been attacking Obama, like a hatchet man. Obama had to call him and her on that. It makes her look weak that she can't run on her own record, or her own likability, which is much lower than Bill's.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.