Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Novak calls Sub S FIT Code a loophole Edwards used to avoid tax.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:44 AM
Original message
Novak calls Sub S FIT Code a loophole Edwards used to avoid tax.
Sub S is a way to avoid "double taxation" by getting folks to pay your corporation, but then treating the income in the corporation as directly taxed to you as an individual. The result is that the wage you pay yourself has payroll tax, but reciepts earned by the corporation are just that and carry no payroll tax implications.

On Audit one can not hide income from the payroll tax as the gov requires Sub S corporations such as John R. Edwards, P.A.(formed in 1995), to pay its sole employee a "reasonable" salary. If paying a $1.1 million salary out of $11.1 million net income does not pass audit, Edwards will be hit with an additional bill.

So Novak is claiming that Edwards is hypocrit for using a sub S structure - a structure that millions of small businesses use - say that it is one of the Edwards mentioned "rich play dirty tricks on the other America" games.

But we are talking about 96 and 97 tax returns in the Novak article.

BUT IN CLASIC GOP LIE AND SPIN, NOVAK SAYS "Whether his tax avoidance was perfectly legal, however, remains unknown in the absence of an IRS audit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jmoss Donating Member (252 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. no thanks...next....
:nopity: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tryanhas Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of course it was...
..."LEGAL," and since it was legal, who cares?

He didn't screw any american workers or send their jobs overseas by making himself a couple of extra hundred grand, not that it did much to inflate his already hefty bank account.

Novak is trying his best to find SOMETHING to talk about in respect to Edwards, and if this is the best the GOP can do, and it is, I'm not worried about it at all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. My best friend owns a dancewear shop. Same tax structure.
She sells pointe, character, and tap shoes; leotards and tights; hair ribbons; and dance memorabilia items under the same Sub S corporation structure as Edwards.

Tax hypocrite / criminal, indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is crap
Edited on Mon Mar-01-04 12:03 PM by mad_as_hell
Drawing a $1 Million+ salary is perfectly reasonable. Edwards maxed out on all the payroll taxes (except the Medicare which has no limit) early in the year.

As an S-Corp, the profits flowed to Edwards who then had to pay regular income taxes. So he paid taxes at 39+% (the same rate he paid as an employee).

So what is this about? That Edwards should've drawn a salary of $8 Million. That is ridiculous.

An S-Corp is not a mechanism to avoid taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 17th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC