Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama trusts women to make prayerful decisions on a deeply moral issue such as abortion...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:18 PM
Original message
Obama trusts women to make prayerful decisions on a deeply moral issue such as abortion...
"One of the things that I've always said is that abortion is a deeply moral issue. And those who would deny that there is a moral component to it I think are wrong. The reason that I make a decision to support the choice position is not because I don't think it's a moral issue but because I trust women to make a prayerful decision about this issue."

Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama trusts women, eh?
Too bad Clinton doesn't trust poor people when it comes to declaring bankruptcy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. only if they pray
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. He shouldn't forget the other half
that is the male component to the conception.

The parents make the decision!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh here we go...
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 02:29 PM by TwoSparkles
What's going to be the Hillary & Bill sideshow spin on THIS Obama sentence?

After watching the Clintons transform Obama's statement,

"Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of American politics"
into

"Obama supports Reagan's policies"....I'm guessing the spin over this next remark will be dizzying.

Let's go ahead and put Barack's one sentence into the "Magical Thinking Turbo T-9000 Clinton
Attack Machine" and see what comes out.

Here it is...

"Today, Barack Obama suggested that all pregnant are immoral if they have
abortions. We are saddened and dismayed that Senator Obama hates women and hates
babies. Hillary and I have worked hard to ensure that all babies thrive in America. Apparently
Barack Obama doesn't feel the same way, and this is truly a sad day for all women
and all of the innocent babies in our country".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't think the Clintons will bite this time....
Remember, she's got some black evangelicals in her stable as well. I don't understand why the mere mention of any & all things religious is met with such hostility by people at DU. The vast majority of black people (of which I am one) are a very religious and god fearing people. That being said, we are also reliably Democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Unfortunately, the Republicans...
...have commandeered many Democrats' views of religion.

Many people are simply turned off. A Democrat can't even mention
prayer, religion or their faith without Democrats thinking that
the candidate is being manipulative.

The Republicans have used religion as a political device, for so long--
Democrats are naturally suspect.

It's really too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. I know, and that's unfortunate...but,
hopefully we're all adult enough to understand that there are people of faith on the left as well. The Right doesn't have a monopoly on faith. Granted, they have used it very effectively, which is why Bush got something like 12% of the black vote in '04. The left is going to have to come to grips with the fact that there are very religious people, with deeply held spiritual beliefs, who are not the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He has a way of speaking
"I think that's a healthy thing, that we're not putting people in boxes, that everybody is out there trying to figure out how do we live right and how do we create a stronger America," Obama said.

... "We're going to keep on praising together. I am confident that we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth."

Who is going to be King? Jesus or Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. If you saw the clips of Obama today...
He's wearing a gold, ruby-encrusted crown, carrying a scepter and his wife is trailing
behind him--holding onto his red, fur-lined cape.

Clearly, the answer is Obama.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Well, I for one don't see him as a King, more like "The Prince" nt
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 03:44 PM by 2rth2pwr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. LOL....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
80. JoBama?
ObSus? J'Bamus?

This Christian is SICK TO DEATH of FUNDIES! Aaaaahhhhhhrrrrrgggghhhh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hate to hear that "prayerful" crap from any of our candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
77. amen!
er.....

sorry, but that was my first reaction!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Your quotes show Sen. Obama in a positive light.
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Was this his comment when he was on the 700 club?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It was on CBN, don't know which show. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. Yep. Arguing a pro-choice viewpoint by speaking in terms his audience can understand.
I understand how it would be a foreign concept to the supporters of the Polarization Express.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Gee, thanks. If a woman chooses abortion, I guess she didn't pray and make the moral decision
I get so tired of this male holier than thou crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. Sure she did. She made her own moral decision, and Obama believes it is not his right to interfere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
61. Give me a break. It is patronizing to women & pandering to the Religious Right.
He is injecting religion into it, and pandering to tHe zealots that HE feels it is an issue of morality and religious belief rather than an issue of women's rights, or our right to privacy.

Pandering to the Religious Right by saying women should pray and come to a 'moral' decision, is an underhanded way of saying he personally feels like they do, that it is a question to put before God, and if a woman does so, she will do the 'right' thing...which for those people is to NOT have an abortion.

We don't need to be told to pray, or what makes us 'moral' or 'immoral' women in his or anybody else's eyes. He makes it an issue of women's MORALITY rather than our right to PRIVACY.

It is the sort of statement the RR uses to shame women who consider abortion.

It's INSULTING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. It's patronizing to claim woman can make their own decisions?
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 04:58 PM by Occam Bandage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #63
70. It's PATRONIZING for him to tell women they need to pray about it, tell us how to be moral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. He didn't say that. He said he trusts women to handle it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #71
81. He did say that! It IS patronizing. It's NOBODY'S business how or what we decide. That's the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. Absolutely. And that was Obama's point. I'm glad you finally got to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #82
94. That was not his point, but nice way to give up when you can't get away from what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #94
96. Yeah, it was his point. You're arguing in the face of his words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. It isn't "pandering to the RR." It's selling abortion rights to the RR. Huge difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #64
78. They aren't buying, and it's the LAW already. He is only pandering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. It is the law. He's explaining why support for that law is compatible with Xianity. And given
his broad-based support, they are buying.

(What makes you think a candidate would pander to the RR by highlighting their pro-choice voting record?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #79
83. They may be buying HIM with his code language that he thinks it's immoral. How does that help us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #83
84. You may want to recalibrate your decoder. Seriously, since when do you pander to the RR by
bringing up your impeccably, 100% pro-choice record?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #84
97. By IMPLYING YOU DON'T LIKE IT, but that's the law. THAT'S how one PANDERS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #97
100. He said nothing about "that's the law." He said he was pro-choice, and trusted women
to make their own decisions. That's selling your platform to a hostile audience, not pandering. Pandering would be if he did the Clinton-style "well, we can all agree on the need to reduce abortions" two-step. He was unabashedly pro-choice there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #100
103. He didn't need to, want to. That's why he IMPLIED it. Do you know how to imply something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #103
104. I don't see any "that's the law" resignation there. He's talking about actively supporting that law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #104
107. While "sniff" feeling it's wrong and hoping women will pray to god and do the 'right' thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #107
108. Again, you're just making shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #108
111. Aaaannnddddd.....She HAS NOTHING LEFT TO ARGUE! Set. Game. Match.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #111
112. Sorry, but "I bet he meant to imply the opposite of what he said" counts as "making shit up."
Can't win on an invalid point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #104
110. "A TEAR"....'sniff', I hope women will ask GOD, sniff, and, sniff, do the RIGHT thing, sniff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #110
113. Straw-Obama isn't a very good candidate, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. spam spam troll troll spam troll spam troll spam spam troll troll spam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. Obama's position is nothing but spam?
There was nothing added to it as far as I can tell. Does his position bother you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Absolutely pro-choice.
Good for him.

:kick: and rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Here-Here. I agree. It's good to see that he isn't trying to decide what's best for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Hilarious to see Hillarites trying to spin "Obama trusts people to make their own decisions"
as a negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I know. But it doesn't matter if he says something, and HRC repeats it verbatim.
They'll take her word over his, and say something was wrong with the way he said it - or how was standing, or what color his shirt was. Complete insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. "prayerful" decisions. And thanks, I don't need his TRUST, I have my RIGHTS. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. You do have your rights. Obama is explaining to the 700 Club why he supports those rights.
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 04:00 PM by Occam Bandage
That's how we ensure you keep those rights--by making opponents of those rights understand why they ought support them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. repeating my downpost: Moral component eh? So women having abortions are immoral and need prayer?
Lovely. If that isn't what he means then someone should tell me what he means when says he thinks it's a MORAL issue.

Obama's statements say much more about him, then they do about any other foe of choice. His treatment of this issue and coziness with so many fundies sets off all my radar. I want none of it. As one who once counted myself as a supporter, I'm seriously disappointed in him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. That is the opposite point than the one he made, as I said in my reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. 100% NARAL rating. 100% Planned Parenthood rating. That's why I love this quote.
A completely pro-choice candidate spreading pro-choice viewpoints to a conservative audience by speaking to them in their language? That's how you transform the playing field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. if someone read your post with an open mind
I think they would agree. However open minds are hard to come by on this board lately...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. This again?
Has it been a whole week already? My how the time flies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
28. Oh dear! He thinks women should make up their own minds!! The HORROR!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Apparently some Clinton supporters would prefer politicians to make the hard decisions for you.
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 03:56 PM by Occam Bandage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. Only with God's help - atheists women may be lead by more moral people
who know what's best for them. Shades of Joementum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. The point which seems to have sailed over your head is that it is the woman's decision.
How she reaches that decision is her business. Not yours and not anyone else's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #41
65. The point is HE'S PANDERING to the RELIGIOUS RIGHT. He should firmly keep religion out of it.
It is our right to PRIVACY, it's about EQUAL RIGHTS for women, and that's what he should say.

We DON'T need anyone framing the issue like this. We don't need anyone telling women how to be MORAL, that we must PRAY to make the 'right' decision. That is all code language for the RR that abortion is immoral.

It is insulting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. Not pandering. Selling abortion rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Again, that's the opposite of what he said. He said women can make their own decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
30. That fits perfectly with Obama's "I am a Proud Christian" quote. Obam the PREACHER~MAN.
If I want a bible thumper I'll vote for Jesse Jackson or Huckabee...I don't want some anti~gay bigot like Obama who has no problem with smoking pot and snorting coke but feels he has a right to judge others.

:kick: and recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
35. Moral component eh? So women having abortions are immoral and need prayer.
Lovely. If that isn't what he means then someone should tell me what he means when says he thinks it's a MORAL issue.

I guess he can send his "ex-gay" preacher squad over to help women repent on their way out of the clinic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Abortion is a complex issue; he's saying he can't judge another's morality because of that.
And because of that, he believes that nobody--including the government--has the right to tell women whether their decisions are right or wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
59. That very clearly isn't what he said at all, it's what you are saying.
He said it's a "prayerful" decision. He said those those who say it isn't a moral issue are wrong. He doesn't get to decide whether it's a moral decision for me or not, that's holy-roller fundie talk and it's indefensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. You are badly distorting his meaning, but we both know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #62
74. On the contrary, that is EXACTLY what he's saying. But I believe you when you say that
you do not see it for what it is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. Sorry, but no. Nowhere does he claim that either decision is immoral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. Women are moral agents. That has been taken away from them by a patriarchal
society and a sexist church. Obama's statement is pro-choice. It affirms women's moral agency that cannot and should not be decided by any sexist part of society. It is important to see women as having such moral agency. Not to do so is to cede moral authority back to the patriarchy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #45
67. If that's what he meant (clearly it was not) then it would have been easy for him
to state it in those terms. He's supposed to be this great orator, right?

He was clearly excusing his position on choice by saying that he believes it to be immoral but he trusts women to be prayerful. In other words, we just have to let those immoral pregnant women go ahead and sin, it's their right. Maybe when he leaves the senate in 2010 he can start a church and help all us poor un-prayerful women repent.

We've had a full 7 years of fundamentalist bull-crap, that's enough for me, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
37. HRC:
" Now with all of this talk about freedom as the defining goal of America, let's not forget the importance of the freedom of women to make the choices that are consistent with their faith and their sense of responsibility to their family and themselves."

Is this a problem for you as well? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #37
86. I'd prefer an "or" between "their face and their sense of responsibility"
but at least she isn't suggesting which faithful action I should be taking before making my decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'll probably prayerfully vote him off this race, the sanctimonious hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. What is hypocritical about saying women have the right to make their own decisions, and then
voting 100% NARAL and 100% Planned Parenthood?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Give it up OB....the Clinton staffers here have their fingers in their
ears. You can't reason with insanity. Just look at Bill these days, he's a raving lunatic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. Implying atheist women should STFU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. First, he didn't, and second, where's the hypocrisy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
46. what about atheists, obama? they, obviously do NOT make "prayerful decisions"
reproductive CHOICE is about RIGHTS, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. It is about rights. Obama is telling the 700 Club why he is in favor of preserving those rights,
despite being a Christian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. he seems to be limiting those rights to those who pray. sorry, that doesn't work for me.
I know he was speaking to a specific audience, but I still don't like the implications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. No, he isn't. He says all women have those rights. And he has 100% NARAL and 100% PP ratings.
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 04:41 PM by Occam Bandage
"Prayerfully" is a pander-word meaning "thoughtfully" to the 700 Club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. he never told you who to pray to.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. And if I refuse to pray to anyone?????can I still have an abortion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Yes. It's clearly your legal right. Obama is explaining why he supports that legal right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #57
66. No he's not. He didn't talk about the law or our right to PRIVACY at all. He pandered to the RR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #66
73. No, he explained to the RR why he supported that right in terms they could understand,
in hopes of converting a few of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #73
91. What, are they stupid? They understand & think it's WRONG. He's pandering by implying he does too.
It's code language for "Hey folks, I think it's immoral too, I think it's a religious issue too, should be God's will, but hey, that's the law, and we just have to encourage women to pray and trust that they'll make the 'right' decision, the moral decision.

Because to them abortion is immoral.

It's all self serving BS what he's saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. Ahaha. So you think he's pandering by highlighting his pro-choice stance.
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 05:41 PM by Occam Bandage
This is what happens when people let hate for a candidate overwhelm their brains. They can't even think about what they're saying any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #92
98. No, he's pandering by implying he thinks it's WRONG like they do, but, hey, it's the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #98
102. "Hey, it's the law?" He didn't say anything like that at all. Nor did he say he thinks it's wrong.
You're just careening off the cliff now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #102
105. YES, he was implying that he thinks it's wrong. You don't understand how implication works?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #105
109. Nope. He wasn't. And since when do you pander to the RR by referencing your 100% pro-choice record?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #92
99. But glad you finally got to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #55
60. you can have whatever the hell you want as far as I'm concerned....
starting with a lobotomy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
47. Gee, thanks Obama.
I'll remember that if I get raped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Remember that Obama is completely in favor of abortion rights, given his 100% NARAL and PP ratings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #50
68. So, we can't point out that he is pandering to the RR, patronizing women by instructing us to pray?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. He's not pandering to the RR. He's trying to sell abortion rights to the RR. If a candidate
were trying to pander to the RR, defending a pro-choice position is not the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #72
85. He's trying to sell HIMSELF by implying he thinks it's immoral and a religious issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #85
89. He's selling himself to the RR by highlighting his pro-choice stance?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #50
88. I don't care for the delivery -
"because I trust women to make a prayerful decision about this issue." Excuse me if I find that sanctimonious - there are many woman who either A. are atheists, B. Do not chose to mix religion into this decision or C. Do not need a MAN to tell them how to deal with a deeply personal woman's issue. There are many instances on how a decision is reached, economic reasons, pregnancy due to violence, health and so on. Don't tell me to pray on it.

Definition of sanctimonious

Main Entry: sanc·ti·mo·nious
Pronunciation: \ˌsaŋ(k)-tə-ˈmō-nē-əs, -nyəs\
Function: adjective
Date: 1603
1: hypocritically pious or devout <a sanctimonious moralist> <the king's sanctimonious rebuke — G. B. Shaw>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. He's not telling women to do anything. He's telling the 700 Club why they shouldn't tell women
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 05:37 PM by Occam Bandage
what to do, in language they can understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #90
93. Who gives a CRAP about what the 700 Club thinks? We know. He's PANDERING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #93
95. Actually, Planned Parenthood in South Dakota took a similar stance to great effect,
and persuaded the public to overturn the abortion ban they had approved just two years before. People will listen if you talk to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #90
106. This is language I understand:
"Roe v. Wade was an important step on the road to full equality, opportunity and dignity for women. On the 35th anniversary, it is important to reflect how far we've come as a nation, but more importantly how far we still have to go.

"I strongly support a woman's right to privacy and reproductive choices. That right has been under attack though -- by President Bush and his anti-choice agenda and by the Supreme Court, which has been moving the right-wing's agenda faster than we've seen in decades. The hard right turn of the Supreme Court is a stark reminder of why Democrats cannot afford to lose the 2008 election. Too much is at stake - starting with a woman's right to choose.

"As President, I will guarantee the right to choose and ensure that women can make choices in their lives with dignity and can participate in our society fully, as equals."

http://www.johnedwards.com/news/press-releases/20080122-roe-v-wade/

And the 700 Club? Since when has pandering to Evangelicals gotten us anywhere? Oh yeah, Alito and Roberts, Scalia, and Thomas. That's dangerous ground he's playing on, and you are deluding yourself that any woman involved with the 700 club is going to take advisement to make this decision prayerfully - because it isn't going to happen. He is pandering, pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
58. I thought you were IndianaGreen and thought something terrible had happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
75. So, maybe an ammendment to require a 2 minute prayer before the procedure?
wtf?

I am so SICK of having to hear about when people should be praying during political debates and discussions. It's way out of line, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
87. Here we go again with this half-wit horseshit...
NARAL and Planned Parenthood give Obama 100% ratings. What a bunch of stupid chicks...

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
101. I can't argue with that logic. Didn't HRC claim that Abortion is "a tragedy?"
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 05:48 PM by ShortnFiery
You folks can't have it BOTH WAYS. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #101
114. She said that in the context of there not being good sex ed. and birth control
so that, especially young, women didn't have to find themselves in that position of being pregnant in the first place.

She spoke about wanting to reduce the number of abortions in that framework, which has always been a feminist position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
115. let us pray. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC