|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:22 PM Original message |
WOW!! Debate Pic from the front page of the Charlotte Observer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. Says it all. Thank you. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. It really does, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. yep, says it all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. were jobs shifting overseas during the 1980s? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. "Shifting" not "shooting through a pneumatic tube" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. Just a few companies, including that newbie Nike |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kat45 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. My job got outsourced in the late 1990s. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
28. Yes, significant outsourcing began in the decade of greed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. Pretty good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Medical Speaking (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:26 PM Original message |
John Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
6. It's easy for Edwards to "rise above the fray" when he isn't being attacked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
7. Your guy is the moderator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. "Your guy is the moderator" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. He seemed to be the M/C - the person who refereed between the other two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Thanks for taking a dump on my thread. Remind me to return the favor some day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 04:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I've seen you shit all over Hillary posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Now, Hugh, I saw Edwards explaining his platform, not acting as an emcee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 05:21 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. He was great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 06:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Thanks, Hugh. As long as Edwards sticks with it, I think he has a chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 06:21 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. I'm supporting the Democratic nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 08:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. I will definitely vote for the Democratic nominee, but I can't guarantee excitement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
8. Wow. A pro-Edwards pic on the corporate paper of NC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Appears he is winning their online poll, too. Link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
9. Unfortunately, it doesn't indicate that Obama's remark was directed at Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Yeah -- I jsut caught that too and posted about it. Sorry I didn't see this first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
10. Would Edwards have read the August 6th PDB ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
12. Rather large downside to this, and it just caught my eye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. Big K&R here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
16. Barack Slapathon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
18. Here's another .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. lol nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
21. Headline: Zingers fly in S.C. debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
26. Obama and Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogmarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
29. Thanks, Yael. Edwards should be the next president! K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC