Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Protecting Hillary: Bill Clinton Severs Business Ties With Billionaire Buddy Burkle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:16 PM
Original message
Protecting Hillary: Bill Clinton Severs Business Ties With Billionaire Buddy Burkle

Protecting Hillary: Bill Clinton Severs Business Ties With Billionaire Buddy Burkle

December 12, 2007 04:06 PM

Bill Clinton has severed business ties with Los Angeles billionaire Ron Burkle, fearful that their deals could erupt into bad publicity damaging his wife's presidential bid, according to sources who know both men.

<…>

The crucial development, sources said, was the September 26 publication of a front page Wall Street Journal article detailing some of Yucaipa's questionable dealings. The story, which broke on the same day that heads of state and business leaders convened to discuss the Clinton Global Initiative, detailed how a young Italian businessman had convinced Burkle and a Clinton aide to invest millions of dollars in a poorly run church-property buying venture.

Clinton, according to sources, considered the piece a major embarrassment and decided to withdraw from Yucaipa.

Clinton was furious with Burkle after the WSJ story appeared, according to a source close to the former president. Burkle and Clinton exchanged heated words, the source said, adding, "their friendship will never be the same. There is now a real distance between Burkle and the Clintons."

According to the WSJ story, in May 2007, Burkle and Yucaipa filed a lawsuit accusing the Italian businessman, Raffaello Follieri, of "systematically misappropriating" at least $1.3 million to fund personal expenses and activities.

Follieri responded by accusing Burkle of blocking efforts to develop the purchased properties. Adding to the embarrassment was Follieri's reported promise to help deliver Catholic voters to Hillary Clinton, according to the Journal.

The lawsuit was settled in late November, according to court documents signed by a Delaware Chancery Court judge.

Prior to the failed church-property buying scheme, Yucapia found itself on the receiving end of a lawsuit. In April 2007, investors of Hawk Opportunity Fund sued Burkle over charges that Yucaipa's acquisition of Allied Holdings, Inc., North America's largest car-hauling company, gave it an unfair share of the market. The suit was dismissed.

But the transaction, not the lawsuit, forced Clinton to get involved. According to reports, the former president was brought on board to help persuade the International Brotherhood of Teamsters to take a 15 percent wage cut at Allied in exchange for bringing the company out of bankruptcy. The Teamsters agreed to accept the reduction.

Finally, according to USA Today, former Clinton aides helped secure a multi-million dollar federal contract for a Georgia-based company in which Yucaipa had 20% ownership. AmeriCold, one of the nation's largest cold-storage companies, was paid up to $85 million, to help with Katrina recovery efforts after James Lee Witt, who headed Federal Emergency Management Agency in the Clinton administration, lobbied on the company's behalf.

AmeriCold's job performance became the subject of controversy and bad publicity. As USA Today wrote: "truckers who were paid $800 a day (to help Katrina victims) hauled ice from state to state without unloading, then delivered their cargoes to AmeriCold and other storage facilities as far away from the Gulf Coast as Maine."

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Protecting Obama: Michelle Obama severs ties with WalMart Supplier
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 05:57 PM by rinsd
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2007/05/sweet_column_michelle_obama_qu.html

I figured I'd help since you account for most replies to your own OPs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. A "WalMartt Supplier"? Seriously? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Heh?
That's it? She had a position on a board with a supplier that she quit is meant as a comparison to the Burkle-Bill scam with its many tentacles.

No, I'm not impressed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Oooh, a Wal-Mart Supplier!!! Scary stuff.
:rofl:

At least it wasn't Wal-Mart itself, Shillbot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I've shopped at Wal-Mart a couple of times...will I ever be able to run for public office?
I mean if someone who sold them pickles is complicit, then I certainly am too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't see what Bill Clinton did wrong here.
Sounds all legal to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Sounds all legal to me." Maybe, but this pushes or crosses over to unethical
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 08:44 PM by ProSense
Follieri responded by accusing Burkle of blocking efforts to develop the purchased properties. Adding to the embarrassment was Follieri's reported promise to help deliver Catholic voters to Hillary Clinton, according to the Journal.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Follieri and Burkle are private citizens fighting each other
And there's nothing wrong with somebody pledging support for Hillary's campaign. Probably over 100,000 people pledge to help one of the campaigns this year. Even if the guy was paid for his support, there's nothing illegal and its not even unusual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. "Even if the guy was paid for his support, there's nothing illegal and its not even unusual."
Are you serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yeah, I'm serious
Jesse Jackson gets paid. Pat Robertson gets paid. Its called something else but lots of people get paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. More crony politics
Burkle-Clinton-Magic Johnson
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/burkle-magic-johnson

Dubai ports deal
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20060303/news_lz1c03grove.html

The Clintons are learning really well from the Bushies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
18. So does this change the fact that they were in bed with him
to begin with? I think not. Same story with Hill serving on the Wal-Mart board. It changes nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
19. Maybe the fact that you keep kicking your own freeper bullshit
is a sign that nobody else really cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. what's the point in kicking a thread
one minute after the last post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Why did you do it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I didn't
I responded. There's a difference.

You all those posts with "Kick" in the title that you put there? That's kicking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. You did! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC