|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Herman Munster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:22 PM Original message |
NY TIMES ENDORSES HILLARY CLINTON |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. Ah, yes... the current employer of the estimable William Kristol... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. Too bad the readers choose Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Not this reader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:21 AM Response to Reply #6 |
24. as a NY resident, I no longer appreciate the NYTimes or Hillary. Neither are really willing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. wasn't this endorsement kind of expected anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yurovsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. What did you expect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. Establishment paper supports the establishment candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. In all fairness to both the Times & Senator Clinton... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:18 AM Response to Reply #9 |
23. So then why didn't they endorse Rudy? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Because Rudy's a major-leage skunk? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Who did the Des Moines Register and Las Vegas Sun endorse in Iowa and Nevada? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
7. Great Endorsement! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. Very strong endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
10. I couldn't disagree with them more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
11. For whatever reason different people here may feel it was written |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:06 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. I agree. I thought they were too dismissive about Edwards, but I felt they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wain (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
13. Surprise, surprise n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electron_blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. Strong endorsement for her, and flattering to all three candidates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
15. Woohoo! Dat's HUGE!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
16. Stand back for the pissing contest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
17. We saw her going town by town through New York in 2000, including places where Clinton-bashing was a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
18. They should have waited until after Hillary's loss in SC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
20. Yes they did. But A New York Paper endorsing a New York Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Interesting that they did not endorse life long New York resident Rudy Giuliani. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 08:52 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Not did they NOT endorse him--they reamed him! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:26 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. comparing Guiliani's candidacy on the GOP side to Obama's on the Left is ludicrous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:31 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. I am not certain what you mean? I have not suggested that in any way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 09:23 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Guiliani is a dead candidate walking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC