|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:43 PM Original message |
BC just said that Jesse Jackson won the SC primary in '84 & '88 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. BC is Bill Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. Yes, Bill Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. And if so, your point? Did he also win Iowa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. He won the whitest state, Vermont, and Alaska too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lurky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
28. Slick's implication is that S.C. only counts if herself wins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think it was a caucus, not a primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. It was the way the delegates were chosen in S.C., so it was just as real as a primary woulda been. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:45 PM Original message |
everytime he speaks he is more patronizing and irrelevent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yes, that's what wikipedia says. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. yes he did, which shows how relevant to the process SC is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. So Iowa and SC are not relevant... but NH and Nevada are? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
53. No, but the upcoming super tuesday primarys are more important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. That's what I was thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
47. Perhaps a poor choice of words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Jesse was NOT a non-factor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. And the result in '88 proves it was WRONG to insist on Jesse and the Rainbow being frozen out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:11 PM Response to Reply #35 |
48. I was pushing for Jesse to be VP on the ticket! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Sorry, didn't mean to slam you personally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #50 |
56. Kucinich supporter, eh? Me too ('04 and '08) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:36 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Indeed. These days, it depresses me in MOST ways... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. clown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #16 |
51. How insightful and profound |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. True. Happened before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unapatriciated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
42. sadly that is what I experienced yesterday....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'm pretty sure SC was a caucus in both those elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. I think it's true for '88, not sure about '84. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
13. Jesse Jackson Won Thirteen Primaries And Caucuses In 1988 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. ...and in reward for all is victories, in reward for the hundreds of thousands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. The Coalition fell on its own sword in some ways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. I realize Jesse himself was partly to blame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. I agree wholeheartedly. Despite a Dem pres, the 90s were BAD for us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
15. Oh puke. Well, Jackson also won my state of Vermont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
18. Wait, did Bill Clinton actually say this? Is he actually trying to liken Obama to Jackson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angie_love (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. oh nos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #18 |
36. It is a compliment in my book. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
55. But Clinton was only referring to the color of their skin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
45. Uh, why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
19. Cheap Shot Artist Bill. Yup. That sounds like its right up his alley. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
24. 100% true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
25. That's it Bill; keep trying to tell us Obama is insignificant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
27. Shameful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pathwalker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Shameshameshameshame. Boy, some people just love that word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
29. Of course, everyone here is slamming Bill Clinton over this, BUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Perspective: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:01 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Nice snide answer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. The Question put to bill was, why is it taking two clintons to beat him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:47 PM Response to Reply #39 |
58. Ultimately, "it may TAKE A VILLAGE OF CLINTONS" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knowledgeispwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
31. Is Bill Clinton trying to point out Obama is black, again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:01 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. Is he? gee, if it weren't for Bill, I wouldn't have noticed at all! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #31 |
52. That's exactly what he was saying. I venture to say if he hadn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
32. Bill answers a non-racial question with a racial answer. I cannot stand this guy. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lurky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
44. I'm officially over Bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
46. Bill Clinton lied again! South Carolina did not have primaries back then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. He may have said "won South Carolina" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
54. And Edwards won it four years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 06:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC