Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC 56% of voters say Obama unfairly attacked Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:46 PM
Original message
MSNBC 56% of voters say Obama unfairly attacked Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think this will be a closer race
Closer than everybody else thinks it will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. And Seventy Percent Said Clinton Unfairly Attacked Obama
This has become a circular firing squad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. By that standard a big percent said both did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Which means that having MSM on your side helps shape perception:
check the coverage:



Obama: 47% positive, 16% negative.
Clinton: 27% positive, 38% negative.
McCain: 12% positive, 48% negative
Giuliani: 28% positive, 37% negative
JEDNE

Net numbers

Obama +31
Giuliani -9
Clinton -11
McCain -36
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. And 70% said Clinton attacked Obama unfairly
Hmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. and about 75% said Clinton unfairly attacked Obama
in case you missed that part of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. And 50% thought both did, so that means 6% thought only Obama was being unfair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And 21% said Clinton. Those are not actually significant numbers.
The consensus was "a pox on both their houses".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. LOL !!! - Nice Spin !!!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. There are multiple thread with the polls saying different
things. Sounds like the polls are lying again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sharptonizing vs reality - it's how March Green lost and Bloomberg got it
It was played in NYC 2001.

And for the higher number on the other side, check the help they had:



Obama: 47% positive, 16% negative.
Clinton: 27% positive, 38% negative.
McCain: 12% positive, 48% negative
Giuliani: 28% positive, 37% negative
JDNE

Net numbers

Obama +31
Giuliani -9
Clinton -11
McCain -36
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You know, we need a chart on what kind of positive verses negative reporting car jackers get.
Seems like the MSM is always being negative on them.

Just saying.

Did you get your numbers from the Hillary campaign? If Bill Clinton ate a baby on TV should the MSM say 50% nice things about him, give him positive coverage?

No matter where your numbers came from, or what they mean, one has to wonder how McCain ever won SC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. He is playing the victim card
The media is in a frenzy about nothing and Obama is using it for sympathy.

"waaaaaa! That mean Lady said something bad! waaaaaa! make her stop! waaaaa! it's not fair! waaaaaa!"

He just cannot take it on the chin and roll with the punches, which Hillary has done for 15 years. If this is an indication of how he would run against republicans, he would be eaten alive in the general, the republicans would rip him to shreds.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC