Some people feel good about voting for Obama. These people, almost universally, don't know what he stands for. In person and on these boards, folks have called me a liar when I've pointed out that he intends to keep a large force in Iraq indefinitely, in order to strike back at -- in his words -- "al Qaeda."
We're supposed to have an informed electorate. Obama voters are not informed. They don't know that Edwards and Hillary both plan to get us out of Iraq faster than Obama does; they don't know that both Edwards and Hillary have plans for universal health care, while Obama plans to leave 15 million poor Americans without coverage.
This has been deliberate. Barack Obama has campaigned on personality, and not on the issues. He has consciously left his supporters uninformed -- his campaign even trains his supporters not to talk about his policies, but to tell others about their moments of personal transformation towards becoming an Obama supporter.
This isn't the action of a leader. Barack Obama is a demagogue. Like Bush and others who rely on personal appeal rather than policy, Obama is denying the electorate of a chance to gain a better understanding of the issues. His rallies, with their "fired up, ready to go," are designed to engage people's emotions while leaving them uninformed. His supporters may feel good about voting for him, but he's won them over by manipulating their emotions rather than inspiring their minds.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=demagogueI don't think anything can be said about Obama's campaign that would be both positive and true. I'm disappointed that he chose this sickening, hollow shell of an approach to a Presidential campaign, and I'm disappointed that so many people have been willing to turn their backs on the poor because a demagogue made them feel good.