The Seattle Times endorses Sen. Barack Obama

After seven years of George Bush's failed presidency, after five years of unnecessary war in Iraq, America is ready to write a new narrative. All candidates favor the now-bromidic slogan: change. Only one candidate truly embraces the yearnings this word represents.

The Seattle Times endorses Sen. Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination for president. He has the grasp, temperament and skills to right our standing in the world. He has broad insight and specific ideas to assuage our own hardworking citizens' fears of an economy turning sour.

Obama has thoughtful plans to help citizens with everyday problems: middle-class tax breaks; elimination of income tax for seniors earning less than $50,000; health care for minors.

Critics ask a fair question about Obama's experience. He has been a U. S. senator for three years, Illinois state senator for eight, lawyer, lecturer, community organizer — a résumé some say is not executive enough for a president.

American voters tend to select governors rather than senators for president, President Bush being a recent example. Bush fit the mold — governor of Texas six years — but his résumé proved to be a failed indicator.

Judgment is more important. Bush's decision to invade Iraq was the most-wrongheaded decision of our time.

Voters this time have reason to focus on other qualities, such as the courage to tell people things they might not want to hear. Obama, for example, took his pitch for higher fuel-efficiency standards to the most-challenging audience, Detroit.

And in October 2002, when our country was horribly bruised by Sept. 11, he came out against the war in Iraq: "I don't oppose all wars. ... What I am opposed to is a dumb war. ... What I am opposed to is a rash war."

Such statements might sound unpatriotic — unless, of course, the speaker turns out to be correct. In an Obama administration, American troops have a chance to start coming home.

Americans have not selected a candidate for president directly from the Senate since 1960, when they elected Sen. John Kennedy, who offered similar charisma and hope.

Obama, more than other candidates, is gut-level inspiring. All candidates speak in platitudes that make us feel good. Sometimes their words actually move us.

"We want a politics that reflects our best values," Obama said early in the campaign. "We want a politics that reflects our core decency, a politics that is based on a simple premise that we stand and fall together."

We need that after the divisiveness of Bush-Cheney. Obama would rather talk to world leaders than rattle sabers at them.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/2004145661_obamaed27.html

Wow i really didnt think the SC win would have legs this long.

I guess it's now or never for these states. I didn't think about how much would happen after today either. There weren't as many states going at once before. I understand he has a lot of ground operations already in place. But this does seem like it's going to take as much work as winning the GE.

I'm glad the newspaper endorsements are coming in this way!!

Then maybe I can go up there after the 5th and do some campaigning!!

caucus

I'm not surprised the Times endorsed now.

Right now I would call Washington state a toss up between Obama & Edwards. Outside of a handful of DLC'ers on Maria Cantwell's staff, there's no support for Hillary here.

Good on 'em!:woohoo:

Cool!