Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kennedy on the Iraq War Vote and the Politics of Hope vs. Fear

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:51 PM
Original message
Kennedy on the Iraq War Vote and the Politics of Hope vs. Fear
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 01:56 PM by calteacherguy
CNN LARRY KING LIVE
Interview With Edward Kennedy
Aired April 20, 2006

KENNEDY: Well, this is where I think as we're seeing Americans now are as I think they have been when given the two kind of options will go for the politics of hope and the possibilities.

I think individuals, I believe very deeply do best individually when they're challenged. Our country has always done best when it's been challenged, coming out of the depression, the Second World War we always have, Korean War. Let's go. We'll go to the moon.

We have always done best when challenged and when we are in this together. I think the country is prepared for that kind of challenge and change and I think it's waiting to do this.

In this book we've outlined some of the areas where I think we have to get it started I think. But this sense of hope and optimism is something that I believe in very deeply and I think that is the -- that is really the future. That's what the Democrats have to offer in this election.

KING: You called Iraq the overriding issue. You voted to go there or not?

KENNEDY: No. The best vote I cast in the United States Senate was...

KING: The best?

KENNEDY: The best vote, best vote I cast in the United States Senate (INAUDIBLE).

KING: In your life?

KENNEDY: Absolutely.

KING: Was not to go to Iraq?

KENNEDY: Yes, not to go to Iraq.

KING: Why did you vote against?

KENNEDY: Well, I'm on the Armed Services Committee and I was inclined to support the administration when we started the hearings in the Armed Services Committee. And, it was enormously interesting to me that those that had been -- that were in the armed forces that had served in combat were universally opposed to going.

I mean we had Wes Clark testify in opposition to going to war at that time. You had General Zinni. You had General (INAUDIBLE). You had General Nash. You had the series of different military officials, a number of whom had been involved in the Gulf I War, others involved in Kosovo and had distinguished records in Vietnam, battle-hardened combat military figures. And, virtually all of them said no, this is not going to work and they virtually identified...

KING: And that's what moved you?

KENNEDY: And that really was -- influenced me to the greatest degree. And the second point that influenced me was in the time that we were having the briefings and these were classified. They've been declassified now. Secretary Rumsfeld came up and said "There are weapons of mass destruction north, south, east and west of Baghdad." This was his testimony in the Armed Services Committee.

And at that time Senator Levin, who is an enormously gifted, talented member of the Armed Services Committee said, "Well, we're now providing this information to the inspectors aren't we?" This is just before the war. "Oh, yes, we're providing that." "But are they finding anything?" "No."

Because the answer was because they're moving things, because when we tell the team they're all infiltrated by Saddam's people and they're leaking that so that's the reason we're not finding anything.

They started giving all the places where we said there were places and they still couldn't find any. And at the end of now, history will show we never gave any information to the inspection team at all.

But I kept saying, "Well, if they're not finding any of the weapons of mass destruction, where is the imminent threat to the United States security?" It didn't make sense.

There were probably eight Senators on the Friday before the Thursday we voted on it. It got up to 23. I think if that had gone on another -- we had waited another ten days, I think you may have had a different story.


The sad aspect was that this administration, this president insisted that we have the vote prior to the election, prior to the election. What does that say to you that they wanted to have it so it was going to be used in the election, unlike his father that had the vote on the Gulf War after the election.

I thought that was an enormously interesting and powerful historical factor and I think that's why those that rushed us to war with inadequate intelligence, carefully selected and manipulated have real accountability in why they shouldn't be held accountable.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/20/lkl.01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damn. I didn't realize the senators had all this information
on the WMD or lack thereof.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Kennedy was privy to more
He was on the Armed Forces committee. So they gave him more information, and probably more lies, too.

Bush played the Congress shamelessly. Whatever the party or vote, everybody was scammed.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Levin made his concerns known to the full senate...
Via drafting the Levin Amendment, which would have forced Bush to actually find something in Iraq before he could declare war.

(FYI, Hillary voted to defeat that motion)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What was Hillary's rationale for defeating the Levin Amendment?
Hmm. I must look it up.

I guess I was concentrating so much on the Bush shenanigans that I wasn't keeping up with all this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I see it now. She didn't want to limit Bush's authority to declare
war.

Smart decision that one. NOT.

I remember this now. I wasn't keeping track of what the amendments were named or anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That was the Right Wing's rationale for defeating the amendment.
The amendments said that if he wanted to declare war he would EITHER have to go to the UN and get approval OR go back to congress for another vote.

But, of course, the Republicans (and Dem senators who were afraid of looking weak) took that "UN approval" option and ran with it, completely ignoring the congress vote option.

This is a pretty good look at the situation from Lincoln Chafee (in case you haven't read it already)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/opinion/01chafee.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Sorry it took me so long to see your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Actually, I thought it was only the UN because I went back to
read her comments on the matter.

So she deliberately left out the congressional approval part.

Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Obama needs to use this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kennedy and Obama were both right about the Iraq War.
That speaks volumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Why has Obama voted with the Bush administration on the war ever since?
Obama wasn't in the Senate for the first vote, but ever since he's been elected, he's voted the way Bush wants him to. I'm not saying Hillary Clinton hasn't - she has. What's the difference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. "voted with the Bush administration"
For crissakes, could you use any more inflammatory language?

Are you insinuating others that voted for funding for the troops were "voting with the Bush administration?"

Fact: Hillary and Edwards gave Junior a blank check which he promptly cashed while at the same time Obama was attending anti-war rallies decrying the imminent invasion.

That's the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC