Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The NY Times, Time, and others talk about Florida - Updated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:07 PM
Original message
The NY Times, Time, and others talk about Florida - Updated
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 05:24 PM by sunonmars
The Floridians are taking great exception to being called "a meaningless beauty contest" by the Obama Campaign. Seems the MSM are not going to be allowed to ignore Florida. You better be careful Senator Obama, Florida is listening very carefully.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/us/politics/27florida.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

Surge in Early Balloting Shifts Florida Races

The level of interest, if it is matched by turnout at the polls on Tuesday, could make the results in Florida more important for Democrats than they had assumed, given both the absence of candidates here and the fact that no delegates are at stake. The Democratic National Committee penalized Florida for holding its primary too early, saying it would not seat its delegates.

“There is a race going on,” said Karen Thurman, the chairwoman of the Florida Democratic Party, who has been urging Floridians to defy the national party and vote. “And there will still be a headline: ‘So-and-so has won Florida.’ ”

Mr. Obama’s campaign argued that the Florida vote is a meaningless beauty contest, given the absence of candidates in the state and the fact that no candidate will win delegates in a contest that both sides have increasingly viewed as a race for delegates, rather than states.

“Although Senator Obama did not remove his name from the Florida primary ballot because Florida law did not allow him to do so, Senator Obama is firm in his commitment to neither participate nor campaign in the Florida primary and its outcome has no bearing on the nomination contest,” Mr. Obama’s campaign said in a memorandum sent to “interested parties.”

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1707293,00.html

The Dems' Florida Boycott Heats Up

But for Democrats, it's hard to find any other silver lining in the fact that their eventual nominee will have no primary face time with voters in such a crucial swing state. "I don't think there is any real chance the Republicans can win the presidency in November without taking Florida," says Steve Geller, a Florida Democrat and the state's Senate minority leader. "But the Democratic Party shouldn't be taking that risk when just eight years ago the whole nation was agonizing over 500 votes in Florida."

http://www.mercurynews.com/nationworld/ci_8092204?nclick_check=1

Every vote matters, unless you're from Florida

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clarkansas Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. And the Clintons care about FL
now that it is in their best political interests. A few weeks ago, they really didn't give a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought he was running ads in that state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. He is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. That is misstating the facts.
Ops! nothing new about that. Obama ran national ads last week. Therefore they ran in Florida. The networks said they would not
block the ads in Florida. Of course, I am sure that you would have preferred that he not run national ads. But he did.

So Clinton jumps on the opening. Cause she is looking more than a little desperate. I know, I know this is all fine with you.
I know, I know Clinton is the victim here. She always is. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. So...Hillary and Edwards are smart enought to campaign w/o running ads in Florida, and Obama isn't?
Got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Nobody is suppose to campaign in Florida.
Got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. So far Obama is the only one who is. Clinton is there for a fundraiser.
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 07:01 PM by wlucinda
Obama has ads running.
Which - for the record - I think should be ok anyway. They see all the coverage all over their tvs. What dif do ads make? But thats not the point...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Well why would Obama run national ads when its primary season?
I don't recall any of the Dem. candidates running national ads prior to Florida so it gives the appearance of something fishy, other candidates not withstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. You guys are unbelievable. You will say anything to justify your point.
There is a national race in 10 days. 22 states. Remember.

Running national ads that cover all these states is cheaper than running ads in individual states.
Plus you get a benefit of introducing yourself to the nation. I bet Hillary will be doing that this week.
Ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. So when did O start running the national ads, ten days from now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. He is running tv ads here
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. He can't even lie straight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. He was not aware he voted no - I mean, they made him do it! Clenis's fault!
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 05:36 PM by robbedvoter
Poneys, dude!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Senator Obama is firm in his commitment to neither participate nor campaign in the Florida primary"
just to advertise there and violate the pledge he made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Now come on be fair!
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 05:20 PM by wlucinda
He just couldn't find any other way to advertise in other states without doing Florida too. :eyes: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Obama "Florida voters have no bearing". Wow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Not a clever response, its cold as hell and written badly

He could have said something like, I share the voters anguish but.......

Oh no, he came out with a cold sharp, Fuck you all in Florida, you don't count to me. I understand from some people i know down in Florida, people are hopping mad about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Obama is saying nothing derogatory about Fla
He is simply following the rules and trying to keep a level playing field. Too bad that Hillary will not follow suit.

I support Howard Dean's decision because when you break the established rules, you have to pay a price. The other down side is that the Repug-controlled state will probably get their tax admendment passed, it appears to be a give-away for the rich land developers and a bum deal for the average taxpayer. There should be less turnout for Dems who might tend to vote "no" on it.

BTW no one is prohibited travel to Florida for next Tuesday, and I don't want to deny Hillary her freedom to travel there. So hopefully when traveling to Florida, we'll assume it was just coincidental, she came there for a quick break, and she will at least keep the campaign low-key. Which might be hard to do in S. Fla. where her biggest support is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What crap, he's running ads to lift his vote out of the basement there

Don't try and cover him when he's clearly doing what he did in Michigan, everything under the radar but then again he'd know about it being under the radar when it comes to shady business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. The Obama team was at the MLK parade in Central Florida
but to my knowledge they didn't set up any campaign tent at the end of the parade. They were clearly allowed to be in one of the front cars of the parade, this didn't bother me at all and it was fairly low key. Just one car with a few people. There wasn't any big rally after the parade.

It was one of the biggest MLK parades I've seen here, and to me it was perfectly appropriate because it was Obama with a relatively low profile.

If there was an international womens' day parade, I would have not minded at all if Hillary had been in that, either, as long as it was relatively low key, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. "He is simply following the rules and trying to keep a level playing field."
Uh, the "level playing field" is called everybody's vote counts. You do not punish voters because party leaders squabble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. the DNC made the rules
it's called protocol, and I can't make up my own rules as I play the game. Might as well have Alice in Wonderland on the party ticket.

Win or lose, Obama will get more respect from the establishment Dems because he is willing to follow the rules for Florida even though the rules might be unpopular for the moment. He's likely going to come in a strong 2nd even without much effort, I don't see an Edwards surge here.

I think as long as Hillary keeps her FL presence out of overt campaigning here, she'll still have my respect as a viable candidate.

I use to worship Hillary practically as a goddess when she ran for Senate in NY, I had the bumpersticker and I was proud of it. But IWR kind of blew everything with me. I won't worship any god or goddess of war!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #30
39. Please read my posts on the topic.....
These are elections by people whose votes must be counted.

The DNC cannot decide during a temper tantrum whose votes count and whose do not. Not in this republic.

If the political parties want to go back to smoke filled back rooms to pick their candidates then let them do so, but....

....if they leave it to their rank and file to vote for delegates that will select their nominees then every vote must be counted and every delegate must be seated.

I repeat: no decisions based on petty temper tantrums by national and state party leaders that violate their members rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatdoyouthink Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm Not for Obama
But Not Really fair - clinton
Breaking her promise - is it?
Feel sorry for Florida - but a deal a deal, unless you lied or are desperate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Karen Thurman is bad for the Democratic Party. She and Senator Bill Nelson are leaches
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 05:19 PM by thunder rising
and coat tail riders of the worst kind. They are both Lieberman Democrats. Fuck 'em. Their best defense is to deflect the blame. They alone are responsible and should be thrown out of the party.

Just look at the FISA vote tomorrow. Bill loves drama so he will not announce one way or the other. He's always worried about what the 26% will think about him. It's a goddam phobia. You know the "26% syndrome" where it does not matter how large a majority you represent you fear the tiniest of minorities.

The best thing to happen to Bill Nelson's campaign was Katherine Harris. Quoting Kos, "'And Katherine Harris has won the Republican nomination for the Senate and will run against Bill Nelson' and Nelson is so happy he's serving the cocktail drinks at the victory celebration". If not for her, he would have been gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Didn't Senators Graham and Nelson both vote against the Iraq war.
Can't be all bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Nelson voted for the war.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Oh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. as much as I respect the 2 guys
they are reactionaries because I guess they feel like it's the only way they can keep their political power in Florida. Maybe that's true, Nelson's district includes Patrick AFB and besides there's a lot of military retirees here. However some of that respect gets severely diminished from me, as a peace-loving civilian, for all their other good qualities. You can't serve two masters. You are either for peace or for war. I don't see any grey areas here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_dem Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sorry
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 05:34 PM by southern_dem
I have no sympathy for the Democratic Party in Florida. The DNC offered to help foot the bill for a caucus where the delegates could be chosen by the rules and the FDP rejected it. FDP legislators moved lock, stock, and barrel with the GOP to change the date to the 29th. Do I feel bad for Florida Dems (voters not leaders)? Yes, but neither Obama or any other candidate is at fault; it's their state "leaders" that are to blame for their primary being unimportant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. So you'd be happy if this was a factor if we lose Florida come Nov 5th

Never underestimate the power of a voter pissed off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_dem Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. No, I'd question their priorities if they put a decision by
idiotic state leaders over the future of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. total stupidity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. come convention time their delegation will be included - count on it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. Bottom line is that voters will vote on their personal preferences, rather than some vague idea
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 05:46 PM by IsItJustMe
about how their state was pissed on. If they want to see more of the same, they will vote accordingly, if not, they will vote for change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tulkas Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
26. Clntons already trying to change the rules so MI and FL delegates will count

The first vote at the convention will decide if those delegates are seated. Clintons already have their machine working on the problem so they can have those delegates.

I live in Michigan and voted Uncommitted, but I am the only person I know who did so. Most people didn't show up because of the lack of delegates. Some switched over and voted on the repug ticket.

Clearly, changing the rules after the vote has taken place won't sit well. Here are MORE people that won't show up for Billary if she is our nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fermezlabush Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
28. Maybe there's a race there after all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Fermez
It's a major contest and there is something going on here as far as Hillary is concerned but Barack looks at it as a beauty contest which screams of "I don't care about the people of Florida since the delegates don't count". Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. I couldn't agree more! Look at what they did to me for mentioning Fla last night:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC