Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think Clinton will still win the nomination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:06 PM
Original message
I think Clinton will still win the nomination
Endorsement doesn’t matter that much, and winning in S.C is not enough to change the voting preferences for those who will be voting on Super Tuesday, it will not alleviate the doubts people have about Obama.

I believe Hillary will still win the nomination and she will win big on Super Tuesday and in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I agree. The Clintons are great
at doing whatever it takes to win, no matter how unethical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Like comparing your opponent to bush/cheney/romney/gouliani, questioning his/her trustworthiness?
running "national" ads that happen to appear in FL

that kinda stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. They did what you mention and a lot worse, except
when did Hillary run ads in Florida? I never heard about that one. I know she is pretending to care abour MI and FL voters now that she thinks she needs us to get the nomination, but I didn't hear about the ads. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. heh. Obama said those things about Hillary. Obama "accidently" ran ads in FL.
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 09:39 PM by Skip Intro
I thought those were the kind of unethical tactics you were talking about. My mistake. It only counts when people imainge Hillary doing it, I forgot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
64. dear God I hope you are right
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 10:36 PM by neutron
She is going to hit the ground running,
and Obama is going to fumble around.

Clinton proved her smarts in the NV and NH debate.
She outfoxed both of those guys, and the media gave
her no credit for it.

Obama might be OK, but right now this country
cannot afford to take a chance. We are in a
shambles.

Let the Clintons get the place in shape again, and
Obama can get more experience and we'll be
happy to have him next time.

Yeah, I've seen too many slime tactics from Obama
supporters on the web. It's been going on since
summer and has me creeped about about the guy.
The Clinton supporters haven't engaged in that
stuff to her credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. Obama is avoiding the issues and playing the victim card
...and it is pitiful to watch. How would he stand up to the viscious onslaught of the republicans and the media if he makes it to the general? His camp endlessly attacks Hillary but then cries 'boo hoo' at every slight little critique. God help us if he is the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
38. really?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k8conant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think so...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who wants popcorn!?
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Doesn't matter what you think....there's rumblings underfoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. She could very well still take it...
Hillary Clinton is a smart cookie, and tough to boot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. As an anybody but Hillary supporter.........
I agree. Endorsements are virtually meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. God, I hope you're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. That's highly likely. And we will have four more years of a GOP president.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. For the sake of this nation's recovery
I certainly hope not. Bush-Clintonism needs to end NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes, I think so. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. I also think Hillary can benefit a lot from fighting against Obama.


She is learning a lot more about how to campaign and counter negative attacks, she is more experienced than ever, thanks to Obama and the negative press coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Your kidding right?
She is using Roves tactics to smear a good man. She is trying to divide the country along racial lines. The only thing Hillary has learned is that if she is to have the power the she so desperately wants, she will have to lie and cheat and distort. The last thing this country needs is the kind of experience Hillary has to offer. We have had 20 years that shit. We don't need any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. She is just trying to win, like politicians do.



I don’t think she did anything bad.

I don’t think those are “Roves tactics”, but standard politics. I think sometimes, she even raised some interesting things about Obama that people should know about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Depends on the meaning of the word "bad"..
Perhaps it depends on the meaning of the word "anything".

Yeah...more politics as usual....that's the ticket!:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. You do know that she invoked Al-Qaeda against Obama
If that isn't Rovian, then nothing is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. i like to see the specific quote, but i believe talking about Al Qadeda is not a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. Ok.
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 09:57 PM by Bright Eyes
DOVER, New Hampshire (AFP) - Hillary Clinton on Monday warned that Al-Qaeda watched US elections, urging Americans not to risk electing an inexperienced president, in her latest implicit swipe at rival Barack Obama.

In one of her most overt plays of the national security card yet, the senator from New York noted that days after Gordon Brown became British Prime Minister, militants planted bombs which failed to explode.

"I don't think it was by accident that Al-Qaeda decided to test the new prime minister," Clinton said here, referring to two devices which did not go off in London and a car which was crashed into Glasgow airport in June.

"They watch our elections as closely as we do ... they play our allies."
--------
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080107/pl_afp/usvote2008clintonattacks_080107215635

Basically, vote for me or Al-Qaeda will attack. Didn't Giuliani say something similar?

EDIT to say, Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. She was warning people should vote for her because she is experienced in how to deal with terrorism
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 10:00 PM by AGirl
Perfectly legitimate for her to do, even if you don't agree with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. She has no more experience dealing with terrorism then Obama.
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 10:17 PM by Bright Eyes
Again, attacking your opponent by invoking Al-Qaeda or terrorism is a Republican tactic. If she wanted to point out that she would be cool under pressure, or that she has better ways of dealing with terrorism, I'd be fine with that.

"I don't think it was by accident that Al-Qaeda decided to test the new prime minister,"
=
"Only I can protect you from terrorism. If you vote for Obama, you could die."

Thats how I see it. You see it differently and thats fine. I just expect better of our representatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. LOL with 35 yrs experience
It is nice to hear you think Obama taught her a thing or two about campaigning

Bet she would disagree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. If she does, McCain will be the next President nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dempartisan23 Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. thats ridiculous
conservatives hate that old piece of crap mccain. we will beat him easy unless alot of democrats sit home on election day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
50. Thats exactly the problem.
Many progressives and anti-war folks will sit home, or vote 3rd party. How many will stay home, I don't know; but we need every vote.

If it comes down to McCain Vs Clinton, it will be a VERY close race.

Welcome to DU, by the way.
Don't let the nastiness fool you, we're quite calm in between elections :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. No more sympathy votes for Obama. He'll have to work for them from now on. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Hillary will win the nomination IF
...and only if, John Edwards says so. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think it's 50/50 at this point. Hoping it won't be Sen. Clinton though.
Honestly, I don't dislike her, but I really believe that she is the one candidate who will either lose or be close enough for the repukes to steal the election.

I think it's a damned shame, because she would be an excellent president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. What about after Teddy rips Bill a new ass hole tomorrow? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. That insult sounds very homophobic.
But I don't think people will be influenced by what Teddy thinks or says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Homophobic?
What the hell are you talking about? You have never heard that expression? Where have you been? And it's not "homophobic" :crazy:

It's not just Teddy who is upset with Bill. It's most of the Kennedy family who realize the Clinton's are ripping the party apart. The Kennedy's know someone needs to stop Bill before he completely destroys the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Some Men Use Language Like That To Cover For Inadequacies In The Nether Region
If you get my drift...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. Sorry, but I am not the Macho type
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 09:52 PM by Quixote1818
That is an old expression that both men and women use and you know it. Argue the point I made about the Kennedy's and their reason for being upset with Bill rather than try to change the subject. That would be the adult thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. I don't care if men and women both use it
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 10:02 PM by AGirl
Language is an important thing to me, I like politically correct languages, don’t tell me what should be considered an “adult” conversation. The biggest reason I won’t support Obama is because many of their supporters seem to have no clue about the how prevalent subtle sexism, homophobia, and transphobia operate in this society. The feel good politics is almost like “pat on your back” congratulation each other on how hopeful and cool we all are, but ignoring and dismissing how people are marginalized in a subtle way. What particularly pisses me off is when people say Hillary is just a wife and she wouldn’t be where she is if not for Bill, I want her to win because I want people to recognize that “just a wife” can win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #46
59. You accused me of being "homophobic" and now you are lecturing me
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 10:30 PM by Quixote1818
about political correctness? In what way does the phrase "rip him a new ass hole" have ANYTHING to do with political correctness? It's not sexist and it's not a racial comment. It means "someone is in big trouble and is going to hear about it". And you already knew that but tried to make this into something it NEVER WAS!


I don't doubt Hillary would be where she is today without Bill and I am sure Bill owes her one hell of a lot, not to mention it sounds like she called a lot of the shots when Bill was president. I would LOVE to vote for a women! However, I am absolutely outraged by the DISGUSTING, SELF-SERVING, CRAP that both Bill and Hillary are pulling and I am glad many on the party like the Kennedy's, Tom Dashiell, John Kerry, Mike Papantonio and many, many others are finally telling Bill to cool his shit.

Now take off the rose colored glasses and see how Bill and Hillary are ripping the party into pieces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
58. Referring to an asshole is homophobic?
Oh jeez... Give us a break. As a gay man, I must say not all references to asshole(s) are gay-specific!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #58
66. Didn't you know that only gay men have ass holes?
And clearly I meant that Teddy was going to sexually abuse Bill. :eyes:

Wow, this place is getting more wacky everyday! :banghead:

Thanks for pointing out the obvious! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
49. Quixote1818, "I" know what you mean. I do wonder if Sen. Kennedy
will bring up Bill's recent role. He possibly should since it seems it annoyed him so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. Obama trumped Clinton SC comments
<snip>

So now Super Tuesday is a contest between those who are mired in racial division and those who are willing to transcend it.

Will Obama’s move trump the Clinton strategy? A lot hangs in the balance. Ultimately, the choice will say more about our soul as a nation than about the candidates in this election.

The boldness of Obama in accepting the Clintons’ injection of race as an issue and his insistence on an enlightened answer challenges us all. Even as one’s head warns that the strategy will fail, one’s heart hopes that it will succeed.

Either way, Obama has made the Super Tuesday vote more about who we are than who the candidates running for president are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. Most here know you do.
Was it worth a new thread over it? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. It's worth it for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I'm sure it is.
If you start more threads, it will be worth even more to you. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. I think it will be a Romney vs. Hillary race...and corporate America will win. ...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
30. Wishful thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
33. she very well might.
but the battle will be tougher than almost any of us could have imagined. it is my understanding that sen obama's ground game is as exceptional as sen clinton's establishment ties. i plan to find out, soon, when i go volunteer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. what state are you in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. california
time to get to work for sen obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #47
68. I've heard that he's very popular in southern cali.
you should keep us updated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trayfoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
39. Hillary V. Obama
I don't know whether Hillary can still get the nomination or not. While I have not been a supporter of any of the top two, I do find myself feeling very pissed at the "apparent" movement under way to subvert Hillary in favor of Obama.

I am from a red state, and I have been a dem for longer than I would like to count. I do, however, see some dubious movements in favor of Obama that I do not like. I believe that the "powers that be dems" are staking their claim on Obama BECAUSE he is black - not because he has the knowledge/experience it will take to lead this damaged nation. I find that reprehensible!

"Inspiration" is a great motivator......but unless you have some "meat" on that inspirational bone, it doesn't mean jack. I have not heard enough detail from Obama to make a decision either way.

I continue to be disappointed at the way the "party", per se, is operating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. I don't know if they are supporting him because he is black or not
But I agree with what you mean about subverting Hillary to Obama. The media is doing that too, and it’s almost like beating on a dead horse.

I think I am particularly sadden by the lack of sympathy or understanding from Obama supporters with regard to the misogyny that is facing Clinton and women in general. I don’t believe there will be “hope” if the very people in it are so unaware or have no clue on sexism and how it operates. The same with homophobia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trayfoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. This so very much reminds me
of the extreme effort women made during the Civil Rights Movement - hoping to be a recipient of the benefits blacks ultimately gained as a result - women did not gain anything significant from their efforts in this movement. Sad, but true! I see that, once again, gender is being purposefully subverted in favor of race. I resent that my chosen party is pandering to either side. While I will NOT vote republican in the GE.......I may stay at home.


p.s. this coming from someone who is not, particularly, a Hillary supporter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. Sometimes, I am not a Hillary supporter either
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 10:07 PM by AGirl
But the primary, and the way this is played out, just makes me go back to Clinton more and more. I believe it’s important to fight corporate greed and disagree with Clinton on some issues, but I just don’t like how dismissive people are about sexism and homophobia, I just don’t like it. This is particularly the case with the younger generation, as a young person, I know what it’s like to be told how being politically incorrect is cool and right, and these kind of sentiments are often associated with those independent or republican young voters who will opt for Obama because Hillary is the devil. I just don’t like what Obama represents and the supporters who are associated with him.

I feel like I am being run over by another male crowd that is telling me to “get with the program” and my own personal plight as a marginalized minority is dismissed as not bieng important, this is what i feel when Clinton is attacked everytime for being where she is simply because she is just a wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #44
62. There may be validity in your point, but for me it is her voting record on Iraq /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. Is your anger as righteous over Bill Clinton for being so involved in
Clinton's campaign and saying some questionable things? Many Dems have decried his actions recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trayfoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. Anger....................
More like disappointment, babylon! I watch the news obsessively. What the Clinton's said was taken WAYYYYYYYYYYY out of context and made to look like something it was not. Granted, the media had a lot to do with that.

I heard and saw the comments about MLK and Johnson. I've heard and seen what B. Clinton said. Sorry.......but I do not see the "racial slurs" these comments were made out to be by Clyburn and others.

I do see a concerted effort by the Dem power brokers to diminish Hillary and raise Obama. I find that offensive, even though I was not going to vote Hillary in the primaries. I am just old enough to see sexism for what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Not just Clyburn, but Kennedy, Leahy, and Kerry. And they weren't
solely criticizing Bill for racism. He's inserting himself obnoxiously into a campaign where he shouldn't be, at least to the extent he's been involved.

It's Bill's inuendo that might be bothering people (and that's subjective, I suppose), but he's also not showing a lot of regard for our party. That could be what people find so offensive. Bill is not helping his wife, at least from what I'm seeing.

Finally, thanks for your thoughtful response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
63. You can also say analagous things about Hillary, and dubious movement
within the Democratic machinery and traditional power brokers

However, things are different this time, because a lot more demographics are at work, and anything can happen

There is a very real possibility that this could be a brokered convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
41. Probably so, but it's getting interesting, isn't it and...
fun to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
43. Yes she will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Knox Harrington Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
53. Great point on Florida
Looks like Hillary will win in a landslide in Florida. Hahaha to Obama and Edwards for being too dumb to run there. Way to go Hillary for snookering them!! If you insist on playing by the rules, you just shouldn't be in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
60. Wow, you know, I have no idea, however I think there is a real possibility for a brokered convention
and then it is anyones game, even someone who isn't a leading candidate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
61. I don't think I know....
The people who support the other candidate have access to TV - we see that is buttholes like Scarbrough and Matthews. But the real true blue Americans still have the say so and Hillary is the say so.....Illinois and a couple of more southern states maybe but that's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
65. OK, leaving aside all partisanship,
I have never cared who endorsed any candidate in all my years of voting. I have always voted for the person who I liked best, regardless of whose endorsement they had received. I don't think that I'm the exception, the average person who's not 100% into politics doesn't pay attention to these kinds of things. The exception this year was Oprah, but even she couldn't win NH for Obama. So, Teddy's endorsement is a big plus for Obama but, outside of MA, I don't think that latinos or union people will all of the sudden decide to vote for Obama in droves just because Teddy endorses him.

Who knows, I could be wrong.......

As for Hillary, I agree with you. I think that when the dust settles she will get the nomination, even if it probably won't be decided until way after Feb. 5th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC