Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY TIMES ARTICLE: Brokered Convention appearing more likely for dems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:53 PM
Original message
NY TIMES ARTICLE: Brokered Convention appearing more likely for dems
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/28/us/28delegates.html?pagewanted=2&hp

By contrast, Democrats eliminated the so-called winner-take-all rules. Instead, delegates are allocated depending on the percentage of vote each candidate gets in a Congressional district, under very expansive rules that, generally speaking, mean the candidates divide the trove evenly assuming they get more than 30 percent of the vote. There are also some delegates allocated statewide, again proportionately.

That rule, aides to both campaigns said, has the effect in a race that seems so closely matched of making it extremely hard for anyone to pull far ahead.

“It’s going to be really hard — I’m not saying it’s impossible — it’s going to be very difficult for someone to pull out way ahead in a delegate count,” said Tad Devine, a Democratic consultant and an expert on his party’s nominating rules. “If you have two candidates who are getting 30 percent of the vote, and that is the scenario that is developing now, they are going to pretty much split the delegates.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh excellent...more infighting.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ya Mean That Teddy Kennedy, Howard Dean, and That Crowd Get To Pick?
Be still, my heart!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Damn! Confusing and interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. All the more important for Edwards to stay in the race until the convention.
And, it's probably the reason that Clinton's campaign is concerned enough to continue funding anti-Edwards robo calls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Fact Question - a DUer (link below) says Obama did the dump on Edwards (not Hillary) - is he wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. hmmm, maybe an apology is in order
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. I still don't think it is likely, but it could happen to both parties this time.
What if we got a Al Gore vs. Jeb Bush race?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. I haven't seen a brokered convention in my lifetime
..and given todays attitudes, I doubt the nominee will be decided in a smoke filled room. One filled with Starbucks cups, maybe, but not smoke.

Both parties may broker this year, which would be wild. From a free publicity standpoint, it's great. The downside is that all candidates will spend money better spenf against the GOP. The other thing with a brokered convention scenario will be whether Edwards will get to play kingmaker; I think it's a safe assumption that the first words, after the second ballot is gavelled, will be "Mr. Speaker, I nominate Albert Gore." All bets are off after that moment.

Gore/Edwards?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. We're not the only ones who could be facing a brokered convention.
Back over yonder in Republicana, things are heating up between Mittens and Insane McCain, with Huckabee still showing no intentions of backing out in the near future. Republicans HATE McCain. If it comes down to Mittens vs. Saint McCain, things will be ugly on their side as well, with Huckabee holding the cards (much like Edwards will in a Clinton vs. Obama battle).

So in the grand scheme of things, this isn't such a huge concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC