Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Triple Standards?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 11:46 AM
Original message
Triple Standards?
I read an article today, on the front page of the Newark Star-Ledger, talking about how blacks are voting for Obama (and making the unwritten suggestion they are doing so because of the color of his skin). I thought about it (something I guess reader's really are not suppose to do). It seemed to me that there is a triple standard at work. It seems to be OK if women vote for Hillary because she is a woman. It also doesn't seem to be worth mentioning that many whites are voting for white candidates like Hillary and Edwards. I have to wonder why blacks are held to a different standard, than women or whites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not enough info...
unwritten suggestion?

How is the implication made that it's ok for women but not for blacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's unwritten, which is often more damaging
You see articles discussing blacks voting for Obama, but you will not see similar articles discussing women's preferences for Hillary or White's preference for Edwards or Hillary. Seems the only group under scrutiny are blacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I thought there was plenty of discussion of women's support for Hillary...
as for whites for Edwards... I dunno...

And IMO it seems like stoking the fires of racism to try to imply a charge like this without any info to back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Just watch how the media plays out
You will see my point is a valid one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC