Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kennedy, One NOW's Hero Is Another's Villain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:44 PM
Original message
Kennedy, One NOW's Hero Is Another's Villain
January 28, 2008

Kennedy, One NOW's Hero Is Another's Villain

Although Marcia Pappas, the leader of the New York NOW chapter, is blasting Sen. Ted Kennedy for the “ultimate betrayal” of women with his endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama, her counterpart in Massachusetts, Melissa Walsh, once gushed that she wished she could “clone” Teddy because he had been such a hero to the women’s movement.

DN Capitol Bureau Chief Joe Mahoney noted the following passage in a 2002 Lowell Sun story:

"Kennedy has also led the way on issues that impact women: equal pay, abortion rights and family leave. This year, Kennedy has been leading the fight on a national level for insurance companies to cover contraceptives, said Melissa Walsh, co-president of the Massachusetts chapter of the National Organization for Women.

Walsh said Kennedy has a long-standing record of supporting women's issues.

"I truly wish we could clone him and keep him around forever," she said.

What's unique about Kennedy, Walsh said, is his sincere interest in the issues and a desire to know how government programs are helping or harming citizens.

"The issues he chooses to work for and lead the way on are most often ones where he has done a great deal of personal research so he can really understand the issues and understand why it's important to pass a bill or block a bill," Walsh said. "He understands the data enough and the policy points so he can be persuasive in his arguments and that's why he's been able to be so effective in Congress."



From 2003:

NOW Applauds Harkin-Kennedy Bill to Safeguard Vital Overtime Protections For Working Families

July 24, 2003

NOW President Kim Gandy salutes Senators Harkin (D-Iowa) and Kennedy (D-Mass.) for their introduction of legislation today that will counteract the Department of Labor's proposal to eliminate overtime pay for a select group of employees. Their bill will protect overtime pay guarantees currently enjoyed by hundreds of thousands of our nation's valuable workers and is a desperately needed step to safeguard millions of working families from future workplace abuses.

"The Bush administration is prepared to sacrifice working families on the altar of corporate greed," said Gandy. "We are witnessing a concerted and interconnected campaign to undermine 65 years of fair labor law and worker protections. Bush and conservative leaders in Congress have set out on a course to save their large, corporate donors millions of dollars by removing troublesome workers from overtime coverage; cutting down on expensive lawsuits with stricter 'class action' requirements; adding 'new' workers eligible for overtime to cover their tracks; and then supporting Congressional efforts to pull the rug out from under these 'new' overtime workers and everyone else by replacing current overtime guarantees with bogus 'comp time' that will be controlled by the employer."

"In their effort to help large companies such as Wal-mart and Clear Channel avoid paying overtime as well as expensive lawsuits, the Department of Labor is proposing to remove the overtime protections from the very workers who have been filing lawsuits when they have been illegally denied their time and a half overtime pay," Gandy said. "The Harkin-Kennedy bill is the only way to prevent the Department of Labor from using this sneak tactic to put more money in the pockets of corporations and deprive a potential eight million workers* and their families of the overtime pay that is their compensation for working above and beyond the normal work week. NOW calls on Democratic and Republican Senators alike to support this critical bill."

Hardest hit by the overtime pay cuts would be nurses, police officers, firefighters, paramedics, cooks, secretaries, dentists, computer technicians, surveyors, designers, graphic artists, health technicians and paralegals—workers who do not have managerial or supervisory duties. Under the Department of Labor's proposal, these workers would lose thousands of dollars a year in overtime pay while still working long hours at the employer's request. Workers often welcome the overtime if it allows them to pay for healthcare, childcare, housing and transportation costs. In addition, without overtime pay protection, these workers will have no defense against excessive work hours that can be demanded of them by their employer.

"The Harkin-Kennedy bill will not inhibit the Department of Labor from including more low-income workers in the category of those who can receive overtime pay," said Gandy. "While on the surface we are pleased that 1.3 million more low-income workers will be eligible for overtime pay, we're skeptical that they may ever see this coverage, since Congress is simultaneously floating bills to do away with overtime altogether and force workers to take bogus comp time at the employer's discretion instead. We're holding our judgment until these bills that erode critical overtime protections are tabled."


The disgusting Pappas should be removed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wouldn't Kennedy's endorsement of Obama be a profile in courage
in a small way? He followed his conscience at the expense of political expediency and capital. He knew he would take a hit from endorsing Obama and you can bet he can forget asking Clinton for a favor in the Senate from hereonin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton, Edwards, and Obama all have excellent records on women's issues.
Feminist organizations ought to remain neutral in this primary, or at the very least refrain from launching dishonest attacks on one candidate's record to advance another. They certainly shouldn't be punishing progressive leaders for not endorsing a certain way. No candidate is entitled to anyone else's endorsement. Period. Endorsements are tainted enough as it is by the perception that they are exchanged like favors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Betrayal of which women, exactly?
The Iraq war has put every woman in Iraq under virtual house arrest, and Clinton refuses to apologize for her vote. Is this supposed to be feminist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC