Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A small blog I found that captures it all for me

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:38 AM
Original message
A small blog I found that captures it all for me

The bush and clintons have been running the US government from 1988. How does Hillary aka Billary embody change? She is the epitome of what we want change FROM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Links? Evidence?
It's easy to repeat malicious gossip. The Clintons are not a two-headed monster with super powers.

"Billary", incidentally, is what the radical right-wingers call the Clintons. If this is the kind of change that you want, I'd ask you to think things over.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. who do you think has been in office for the past 20 years? Bush, Clinton, Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. And 1993-2000 was such a terrible era -- NOT
But it's about the dynastic element, right? Like the Kennedy dynasty?

Or maybe it's Bill and Hillary as a two-headed monster with super powers?

Honestly, now ... have you ever written or spoken a single word about the policies and proposals of your candidate, or is it all about hating Hillary?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. No-one ever called it a bad era but dynastys are what America stood against in its concpetion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Then why no outrage over Kennedy?
Seriously, there are very few people who care that much as long as the candidate is up to the job -- and preferably the best one for it. It worked out pretty well in the Roosevelt family.

More people have got to get personally involved in politics -- and put the media on a leash. Craving "leadership" will only get us into trouble. Dynastic politics is the least of our worries.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC