Get this from his speech:
"The people's trust in their government is undermined by congressional earmarks - special interest projects that are often snuck (Note: snuck is not a word) in at the last minute, without discussion or debate. Last year, I asked you to voluntarily cut the number and cost of earmarks in half. I also asked you to stop slipping earmarks into committee reports that never even come to a vote. Unfortunately, neither goal was met. So this time, if you send me an appropriations bill that does not cut the number and cost of earmarks in half, I will send it back to you with my veto.
***And tomorrow, I will issue an ** executive order that **directs federal agencies to **ignore any future earmark that is not voted on by the Congress. If these items are truly worth funding, the Congress should debate them in the open and hold a public vote."
http://www.wthr.com/Global/story.asp?S=7787511* added by me for emphasis (I can't seem to highlight or underline).
Isn't this similar to a line item veto?
Since when can he ignore pieces of a Congressional law?
I guess he made himself God and I missed it.