Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Plans Rally After Unsanctioned Fla. Primary: Below-the-radar effort acknowledged

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 03:07 PM
Original message
Clinton Plans Rally After Unsanctioned Fla. Primary: Below-the-radar effort acknowledged
WP: NON-CAMPAIGN NON-EVENT
Clinton Plans Rally After Unsanctioned Fla. Primary

By Anne E. Kornblut
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 29, 2008; Page A08

In a bit of a reverse campaigning, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton will appear in Florida after the polls close Tuesday night -- abiding by a pledge not to actively pursue a victory in the state in accordance with Democratic National Committee rules.

But Clinton expects to win. Her campaign has been running a below-the-radar effort to capture Florida even though the state's delegates are not going to be seated at the Democratic convention this summer, punishment for the state's decision to move its primary to an earlier date than allowed by the DNC. Clinton (N.Y.) attended fundraisers in Florida on Sunday, received the endorsement Monday of Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) and was the beneficiary of mailings sent by union organizers into the state.

Clinton's victory rally is scheduled for 8 p.m. at a ballroom in Davie, Fla. Officials in the campaign of Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) dismissed the maneuver as "too cute by half," and said they were glad that Clinton would be spending time in a state whose primary had already ended rather than campaigning in a state that will vote on Feb. 5, when Democrats in 22 states will go to the polls.

Privately, several Clinton supporters acknowledged that she had openly embraced the votes in Florida and in Michigan, another state that violated DNC rules, only after the first two contests, in Iowa and New Hampshire, were over. Campaigning in banned states any earlier would have been certain to infuriate voters in Iowa and New Hampshire, who jealously guard their early status.

Obama officials said they would welcome an additional, DNC-sanctioned caucus or primary in March or April and would compete in such a contest.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/28/AR2008012802395.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. The whiner wants ANOTHER do-over.
Recount!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. leave SC after a real primary but go to Florida after a fake primary
:eyes:

I guess the difference is she lost South Carolina horrendously and apparently for that, her volunteers, supporters, and voters get no thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think the difference is that voters in Florida acutally are in a swing state
that could vote for a Democrat in 2008 and help us beat the Republicans, unlike Sousth Carolina. I think it isn't such a bad idea to run a candidate with strong connections to and support from Florida voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC