Dan Abrams (MSNBC) telling it like it is about media bias against Clinton

Finally!

It's been that way since at least 1992.

all of it? every last program?

...was coming to the rescue of that female child abuser he has a massive crush on!

:thumbsdown:

I'm serious ~ have you ever seen him when her story is on?? Just like tonight!

:wtf:

...when he talks about the criminal teacher he's so hung up on (can't think of her name) ~ it wasn't a swipe at Hillary.

:hi:

What's YOUR problem?

:hi: But if you want to go all paranoid, feel free.

Can we just let this go? It is getting absurd.

It must be time to hit the sack. :hi:

spewed by the MSM toward Hillary and the FREE PASS on the other candidate.

The quiet sweeping of all IranContra's outstanding matters under the oval office rug for Poppy Bush and his operatives like Elliot Abrams should explain why.


http://consortiumnews.com/2006/111106.html

Didn't work out well for the party or this country though, did it?

it will be totally ignored.

Thank BLM. Some of us do have a memory before Monday.

I find comfort knowing there are others who feel the same.

Notice that nobody else bothered to comment on the fact that Elliot is likely responsible for the deaths of what, 500,000 or more people in the last 25 years?
Nah, its easier to talk about how bitchin Dan is....

People should watch.

dang. I love Dan...

Oh God that's funny!!!

You MUST be joking to believe something that f*cking stupid...

Even in this hit piece by E. J. Dionne from the Washington Post, he admitted the following:



And the NY Times may have endorsed Clinton, but it has Dowd, Rich, Herbert and Brooks ready to attack Clinton every single day.

Clinton is the media's nemesis and it's not even close. Edwards was hated too. But Obama? They love him.

...he is getting such a free pass now he won't know what hit him in the GE when the media decides it will let the Repukes go after him...just look how defensive and whiny he gets over any criticism. He will implode big-time.

Of course the Corporate media are propping her up

:shrug:

http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/postopinion.htm


POST ENDORSES BARACK OBAMA


January 30, 2008 -- Democrats in 22 states across America go to the polls next Tuesday to pick between two presidential prospects: Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

We urge them to choose Obama - an untried candidate, to be sure, but preferable to the junior senator from New York.<snip>

For all his charisma and his eloquence, the rookie senator sorely lacks seasoning: Regarding national security, his worldview is beyond naive; America must defend itself against those sworn to destroy the nation.

His all-things-to-all-people approach to complicated domestic issues also arouses scant confidence. "Change!" for the sake of change does not a credible campaign platform make. But he remains a highly intelligent man, with a strong record as a conciliator.<snip>

Finally, Sen. Clinton stands philosophically far to the left of her husband, and is much more disciplined in pursuit of her agenda.<snip>

wasn't that the point?

It's written to push the left AWAY from Obama and towards Hillary, thus the comments about her being further left than Bill.

Nice water-carrier Mr. Abrams is. Even his guests disagreed with him.

Edited for link: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4299011

all they have done is call the clintons calculated, self serving. Um THEY CARE ABOUT AMERICA. Why would they devote their lives to the working class, and all americans. If they only cared about money and power they'd be republicans.