Now that he's running, should I go into double Nader overdrive?
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 12:15 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Now that he's running, should I go into double Nader overdrive? |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 12:16 AM by LoZoccolo
Normally I try to limit myself to one anti-Nader post a day. Now that Nader has started campaigning, would you like to raise the limit to two?
|
WillYourVoteBCounted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 12:17 AM
Response to Original message |
1. he's "exploring" a run |
|
so people should email him and tell him to stop being selfish and don't do it.
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I should qualify this. |
|
Posting anti-Green (a la Cynthia McKinney) or other anti-splinterist material would count toward the limit as well.
|
Lilith Velkor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Don't forget Bloomberg, either. Perhaps you should raise it to three in that case.
|
LakeSamish706
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I hope that people will tell Nader to go stick his head up his ass instead of thinking about... |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 12:22 AM by LakeSamish706
screwing up the current presidential run..... The guy is a Fu**ing nut job to say the least.
|
cobalt1999
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message |
4. There can NEVER be enough negative posts about that anti-democratic piece of shit called Nader |
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message |
5. There is no such thing as bad publicity. But if you must advertise his name |
|
then I think you should be willing to take some measure of responsibility for helping him, even if that's not your intent.
One would think you might have learned something from the more vociferous anti-Obama (read pro-Clinton) supporters. Ignoring Nader just might be a better strategy.
I doubt that will happen because of the publicity you receive while simultaneously publicizing Ralph.
Just sayin'
|
SmellsLikeDeanSpirit
(471 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 12:36 AM
Original message |
This hate toward Nader is pretty dumb. |
|
11% of registered Democrats voted for George W. Bush in 2000 according to National exit polls. Nader didn't hurt Clinton, Gore, or Kerry in any of his runs. If one if looking for a scapegoat, others are involved and none are named Nader.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 01:17 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Yeah, because "they're all the same" bullshit |
|
Whether those Democrats chose Nader or Bush, it was due to the same stupid notion that Republicans and Democrats are all the same. I can't stand Hillary and I'm not even stupid enough to say she's just the same as McCain. Nader is a fuckwit that caused all these shit and he needs to shut the hell up and go suck on some greenhouse gas.
|
Clintonista2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message |
6. As much as I'm not a fan of Nader... I'm even less a fan of LoZoccolo |
|
So no, I don't think that you should post anymore.
|
Lilith Velkor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-31-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 16th 2024, 05:58 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.