Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why I'm going to continue to vote for John Edwards on Feb 5

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 08:36 AM
Original message
Why I'm going to continue to vote for John Edwards on Feb 5
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 08:45 AM by kelligesq
John Edwards has framed the issues all along - Single Payer healthcare, not

Universal, lobbyists out of the elections, America taking care of and giving a

chance for affordable college, taking care of our Vets, bringing home our

people from Iraq within a year without permanent bases in Iraq, restoring

America and every issue until Obama and Clinton "borrowed" his populist stance.

But "borrowing" words is not a commitment to carry them out whichever

one gets the nomination for the general election.


That is why we must must must continue to vote for John Edwards on Feb 5

The more delegates he collects even though he has "suspended" his campaign (I

suspect because of the MSM essentially boycotting coverage of him and the

failure of the feds to match funds until March) the more power John will have to

extract a written committment from either or both candidates to adhere to John's

and our populist issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds selfish ...."Spoilers Pot"
He is out....so he needs to let go and not sabotage the system. If Edwards "minions" continue this deviant behavior, I will voice my concerns of Edwards having a cult leader mentality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You cant tell me how to vote & your talking about cult is truly laughable.
This is not a f__king dictatorship yet.

go whine someplace else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. This is about VOTING OUR VOICE....because the other two are
not addressing the core issue of corporate malfeasance and power.

The system is already sabotaged, in case you didn't notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
63. How corporate malfeasance & power decided who you would vote for- take a look
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 04:06 PM by kelligesq
stick it to the corporate media - vote John Edwards on Feb 5 Super Tuesday


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #63
103. Yup, saw it already....shockingly obvious what was going on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Welcome to the list!
Have a great day.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. LOL!!!
"so he needs to let go and not sabotage the system" It's "the system" that I FEAR and DESPISE MOST!!! Damned if I'll kowtow to The System!!!! That's for those of a pachydermal persuasion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
75. Silly. The system is what John Edwards correctly said was broken n needed changing- you're worried
about the system? the corporate stranglehold on this country?

Do you see any of the other two talking about it?

Here, I'll show you who the corporate media system supports:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
60. Are you a Nut, John Edwards following wasn't a cult,
We must , we must fight on and be sure we have a democrat Congress and Senate, look what Clinton did for the nation with both houses republican, I will sure like to see what Hillary, will do when both houses are democratic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
74. How dare you. But exactly the kind of response we all expect from a Hillary supporter. Embarassing
to be in the same profession as someone with this horribly disgusting attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElboRuum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
92. Hrmmm...
Well I guess all of these Edwards supporters... sorry... minions... I want to be as accurate in the characterization as possible... had better just watch their pints and quarts, eh?

Wherefore? Else thee shalt unleash upon the earth and the firmament, a torrent of caustic script, and to the knave Edwards specifically, regards to cult leadership, thou shalt say, with honest and grave conviction, j'accuse!

Wouldst though be so formidable? Or wouldst thine horrific verbiage falleth upon the ears of the deaf? Methinks yon Edwards minions shant be quaking in their boots.

Good Morrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #92
96. Well spoke elbo. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
95. So is your rudeness intended to get us to fall in line behind your candidate?
You act as if you don't care if we support your candidate or not. But when McCain wins, you'll be the first to whine that it is our fault. We tried to warn you but you are afraid to support a progressive. No you will stick to the corporatist sponsored status quo candidates and berate us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
101. Get over yourself. You aren't god.
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 08:07 AM by TheGoldenRule
:eyes:

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. sounds like you know exactly why you want to
to vote for him on Tuesday. I don't agree with several things you say, but it looks like you've thought it through and arrived at the best decision for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. good post...
from you Cali, knowing who you support, very decent . Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Your OP made it easy, kelligesq- you didn't engage in any
egregious bashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. I predict another candidate will be out after Super Tuesday
The DLC doesn't want a real primary, its cheaper to have a coronation. Go ahead and vote for Edwards, it won't hurt anyone. The corporate bigwigs will have another meeting soon and narrow the field on their own.

I do find it humorous that everyone who criticized Edwards for having so little support are now worried about Edwards supporters are going to vote. Gee, I thought we were insignificant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. Yeah, that slays me too. Very humorous indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
45. SPOT ON!!!
From Irrelevant to Relevant overnight! Now THAT'S power!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desertflamingo Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
108. excellent point!
and who are these people demanding we vote for their candidate? who said? as the saying goes... "you're not the boss of me!" my ballot for je is on its way as i type - if it's not already there. i will not be dissuaded.

EDWARDS DEMOCRAT!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'll probably vote Edwards, too, simply because I see no real distinction between Obama and Hillary.
There may be a couple of differences, but I prefer Hillary on half of those differences (health care, fighting against anti-consumer tort legislation, etc.) and prefer Obama on the other half of those issues (Kyl-Lieberman, tax cuts for the wealthy, etc.).

It's a complete wash between Obama and Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
61. You are wrong there , Bill Clinton was one of the best with both houses republican
think what Hillary can do if we elect both houses democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #61
76. Bill Clinton is not running & was not as far to the right wing - somehow the entire dem party
has gone to the right wing. So far right that there is not that much difference
between the republicans and democrats today. At least 15 or more dems vote with
the republicans.

This dem party is not the dem party that it was, with Pelosai and Reid cooperating with the republicans even though dems are now th majority. To me that means America has one party - and it's not the democratic party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. My thoughts exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
111. The distinction is this.
The United States of America has been forced into a steady decline over the last 28 years. It has been a deliberate move of corporatists attempting to forever destroy the American Middle Class. One of two names has appeared on every Presidential ballot in those 28 years.

Bush or Clinton.

Not Obama. Not Edwards either, of course. But John gave up this fight when he couldn't win his own home state. I have a great deal of respect for Senator Edwards, and I would love to see him as Attorney General in the new administration, going after the corporations exactly as he said he would.

That's not going to be possible as long as a Bush or a Clinton occupies the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. Thats the decision I reached last night too NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. But he needs 15% in any given state to get *any* delegates
from that state.
So unless you think he'll still get 15% where you live, you are throwing your vote away in terms of delegate selection.
You'd still be sending a message by upping his popular vote total, but that's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. he's always gotten at least 15% - still gives the POWER to affect change
SC was an anomoly bcz it became a black vote thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
79. History repeats itself
At the turn of the century when people demanded change from the corrupt corporate government, there was a Progressive mood in the country. They didn't win the Presidency but did influence policy with unions, etc.

We badly need that now. This administration is worse than the Hoover, Wilson one because they have destroyed our wealth and power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. The message we send with our vote is ALL we have.
I prefer not to give it up voluntarily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. If we don't really care which of the other two wins, there's absolultey no reason not to.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
42. well, ya got me there.
;) :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. msnbc reporting both clinton n Obama trying to get Edwards vote promising
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 10:18 AM by kelligesq
to uphold his fight on poverty

the fight on poverty is not the whole issue. MORE IMPORTANT is taking back America from the corporations which Clinton refused in debate - and Obama double
talked the issue - so what did he say- where does he stand - who knows

Like John said - do you think the lobbyists and corporations gave you that money
and they dont want anything in return?

dont forget over 100 million ++++ both Clinton and Obama each
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
113. The only way John Edwards can go after the corporations now is as Attorney General
And it would have to be in an administration which would allow him to act on it. And that's not going to be any administration with a Bush or Clinton in it.

I'm not saying there's any deal between the Edwards and Obama camps, and I'd have no way of knowing. But it's obvious that the AG position would be a much better fit for John than Vice President, given his fight against corporatism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
16. Don't blame you. I voted Clark in 2004 too - after he droped out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
80. Did Clark drop out before Super Tuesday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #80
85. yes. Kerry and Edwards were the only viable candidates left by Super Tuesday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #85
91. I don't know how viable Kerry was since he let the
Republicans steal the election. Pelosi and Cubbs Jones stopped the election count and declared Bush the winner before fraud was investigated and all the votes counted.

I doubt Clark would have allowed that since he's not a coward or traitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #85
107. Obama won big time in CA probably for his amnesty policy
for illegal immigrants(Chinese, Hispanic,...actually from all over the world).

If Edwards had campaigned he might have beat Obama and Hillary. He quit before it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
17. Good for you!!
That's exactly what you should do. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
20. No shot of him getting 15% in my state
He has my vote regardless.

The rest of the country can flip the coin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Glad he has your vote Yael, what's your state? maybe
people will be angry enuf to realize the media is choosing our candidates
and there will be a backlash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. PA -- we don't vote until April
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
81. You don't have a vote in the primary
The candidates are decided before they get to your state. My state of Illinois is the same now.

We have to have the primary on the same day not four or five states deciding it for the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. .
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iris5426 Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. Yup right there with you...
I guess since we never turned in the sigs we were gathering to get him on the ballot, we'll have to write him in on 4.22 but that's what I fully intend to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I will bring a backup pen with me
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iris5426 Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #40
47. Can't use a pen on the crappy paperless touch screens silly nt
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. touch screens likely will still have Edwards on for primary but if
they dont, you can always write in Edwards for the Generl Election - they definitely have write in then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. It is very doubtful he will be on the ballot
We just kicked off the petitions to have his name put on the ballot on the night of the 22nd.

I can't see the campaign paying the state fee even if they already have the required signatures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Your touch screens are not programmed yet? well for April you could be right.
Pa. wasn't gong to have his name on the ballot...and he's been campaigning for a year?

pretty unbelievable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. We have both options. In 2006, I took the paper ballot
Not that they counted it or anything. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fox Mulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
23. I'm going to continue to support Edwards during the MN caucus on Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Hope you can convince a few undecideds or other Edwards supporters to do the same...
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 11:07 AM by redqueen
If they don't care which of the other two win, there's absolutely no reason not to do this.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fox Mulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I'll try.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. kicking for noontime crowd. Any R's?
:kick: for John Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. Continung to vote 4 John still gives him THE POWER - he can still
broker with our votes for him and more delegates that the other two want.
.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
30. Our caucus will only have Clinton, Obama, and undecided

If we can't keep 15% undecided, we will caucus with Obama and be delegates to the county convention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. no write in? Can you hold up an Edwards sign and explain
why its important to keep him voted in to extract promise from the other two
for election reform, single payer and so on as is in the header?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
49. Nope, I checked

The Nebraska caucuses will only offer the two major candidates and uncommitted. There is no private ballot, only those 3 groups.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Then I would say go uncommitted - at the general
you can write in definitely even on the electronic machines,

or if paper ballot no problem writing in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
31. Well I really wish
You'd vote for Clinton or Obama...I'd really like for you to vote for Clinton ;) but it's your right to vote for who you will. I see your vote will be your statement and your voice...and your right. I'd rather you make a statement than sit at home. Just hope we get your vote in November.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. To vote as you suggest is to continue the status quo -both corporate n cooperate with
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 01:11 PM by kelligesq
rethuglicans.

We already have that and look at what it got us on the Supreme Court - a right wing supreme court.

If progressives want to meld with the republicans, that's their business, but I wont be one of them.

For Feb 5 still voting Edwards to give him the power

For the general election a write in of Edwards/Gore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. again it's cool
It's your voice to be heard

but I am sure Edwards and Gore would want you to vote for whoever is the Democratic Candidate is. When Dean got frustrated in 2004 and almost left the party, it was Gore who told him to stay and support the democrats. It was Gore that told him that things weren't perfect but we were democrats and we need to stand together. Trust me...Al Gore is my hero and my heart will never heal for him not winning 2000, but he's right about the democrats sticking together and hell or high water...In November The Democrats Are Going To Win It All!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
34. Do you think John Edwards would want you to waste your vote?
It makes more sense to opt for whichever candidate will - in your mind - be most likely to carry out the Edwards agenda. I'm hoping John will endorse someone before Tuesday. If he does I hope you'll take that into consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. You're not reading the header. A vote for Edwards is NOT WASTED - gives him
the power to continue influencing the election.

Will I vote for either of the two - highly unlikely.

I'm not a progressive, which has come to mean centrist in DC

I'm a liberal which means populist: For The People

and neither of those two are as long as they are glomming corporate contributions


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. I don't see how it influences the election toward the desired outcome
you might want. Like it or not, come Tuesday the likely candidate will be known. Your nonvote for either of them will mean absolutely nothing. That's why I wish John would get behind someone before Tuesday, but apparently he isn't going to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. the answer is delegates- they want John's delegates - the more we vote for him, the more dels he can
use as a wedge for them to restore America the way John would, or as close as can be expected. Plus John's a lawyer - don't think he'll just take their word
for it....always get it in writing. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desertflamingo Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
109. "waste" my vote?
ummm... it's MY vote and i shall decide how to make it. once made it is neither wasted or thrown away. it's MY vote to make as i please. hopefully others will have joined me, but that's what voting is, isn't it?

EDWARDS DEMOCRAT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
36. The issues are election reform n getting corporate money out of elections n DC
that's where taking back America starts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
37. My plan
is to vote for John Edwards in the primary February 5, and the Dem candidate in the GE.

Neither Obama or Clinton has done a significant thing to earn my vote since Edwards dropped out.

Even if Edwards delegates are not counted for some reason at the convention, my ballot will be

counted in the tally of those who wanted real change in this country. And that means a great deal

to me.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. good post - write ins are counted at general election - yes
it is a message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanbean Donating Member (957 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. I am hoping my bumper sticker and Edwards button pin arrive before Tuesday!
Then I can proudly display them when I make my vote. I also have convinced my brother to vote Edwards too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #46
97. You cant take the button into the voting room, but great that you n bro for Edwards !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
54. Great post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
56. I'm sticking with Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
57. Want proof media purposely ignored Edwards populism n chose who THEY decided candidates would be?

here's the graph of how much publicity on all media Edwards received in all of 2007





more graphs and purposeful badmouthing of Edwards for his anti-corporate stance.

It'll be interesting to see if Edwards buys a newspaper or a tv station to continue getting his message out - as Gore did.

Better yet, I wonder if Edwards and Gore will throw in together.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Angry? Stick it to the corporate media. Vote for John Edwards on Feb 5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #59
68. You bet! I'm voting Edwards Feb. 5 in California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
58. Edwards would be disappointed in you. He got out of the race for a reason respect that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. Reason r posted in previous 2 posts.Since u dont speak 4 John Edwards its good to ignore u thanx
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 03:56 PM by kelligesq
:spank:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #58
82. What about Edwards respecting my faith in him
and sending him money to run for President? Not to mention the hours listening to all the debates, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #82
84. You can still have faith in him that he is trying to influence the dem platform
and the candidates.

Would you have not listened to the debates anyway?

I sent money too. The feds and the corporate media screwed him by not matching
his funds til March and the corporate media by not featuring him even after he won debates.

You can't run a campaign without the funds and since he's not taking corporate
money he's not collecting millions like the other two.



This is how the corporate media and corporate control over this country picked your candidates for you



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #84
89. He could have waited until after Super Tuesday
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 09:49 PM by mac2
even if he didn't have money to campaign. The "liberal states" have no say.

Pennsylvania doesn't vote in the primary until April. That has to stop.

All states should have a say in the primary candidate for President.

Am I being too "democratic" Democratic Party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
64. and I will vote for him in Virginia on February 12 ..... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. a wahoo for Vadem and all of us John Edwards voters - spread the word, Vote John Edwards Feb 5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Middle finga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
65. Since your vote is only symbolic why not give it to Gravel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. MID - it's not symbolic see - the two are after John to give them his delegates-especially
the rotten media is reporting Obama's people are after John in a big way.

The more people who continue voting for John in the primaries, the more power John has to elicit guarantee from whoever he does give delegates to that they will uphold his issues -

continuing to vote for John Edwards in the primaries gives him power, leverage
over the platform of the democrats.

SEE?

and personally I will write in his name in the General Election also, you never know...if enough people do, we could have a winner and not just a brokered election.

But if you want to write in Gravel, you should do that. His name wont be on in the primaries but you can write his name in at the general election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
69. kick it and keep it kicked for John Edwards on Feb 5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
70. I'll do it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Great (((Ojai )))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
72. GOOD ON YOU! All of us Progressives need to Vote for Edwards or if he's not on ballot and you can
WRITE IN then go with Kucinich or Gore. Let's show then where we STAND!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. How about Edwards/Gore or Edwards/Kucinich but
you still have to think about electability and
Edwards/Gore is very electable.

I wonder if Gore is going to get angry enough to speak out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
78. ON JOHN EDWARDS BLOG SOMEONE HAS BORROWED MY HEADER & ITS CHOSEN AS OPENING POST SO
I TAKE THIS AS SANCTIONING OUR GOAL TO GARNER VOTES AND DELEGATES FOR JOHN EDWARDS ON FEB 5

WE NEED JOHN EDWARDS AND HIS IDEAS AND DECENCY

IT NOT OVER TIL ITS OVER AND ITS NOT OVER FOR JOHN AND US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #78
88. THE ABOVE POST IS IMPORTANT - PLS READ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
83. Don't let anyone tell you how to vote. You have a right to vote
for whomever you wish.

People on this board are a bit presumptious thinking you should support their candidate.

Tell them to fuck off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #83
86. Mostly Edwardians on this thread-and not using "language". Is there a problem?


This is how the corporate media and corporate control over this country picked your candidates for you


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
87. I intend to as well. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
90. That's stupid... what a waste of a vote
why not just vote in the Republican primary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #90
93. EDWARDIANS - GO TO JOHN'S BLOG & LOOK AT FRONT PAGE OPEN MIKE POST
someone has taken the post from DU

VOTE FOR JOHN E ON FEB 5- GIVE HIM THE POWER

and posted it on John's site, the campaign has put it up on front page, open mike
so I take that as positive sanction by the campaign for our efforts to get John more votes and delegates on Feb 5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
94. I'm voting for Obama - sent in my absentee today.
I'm hoping for Edwards as a VP or as Atty Gen.

I cried, I got over it. I want change and Obama is the natural slide for me.


Am I disappointed? Yes
Am I a realist? Yes.


In a shitty system I will do what I must'


PS - my sig line is still open for 'a light'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #94
98. That's your right. I'd rather help influence the dem platform with the one John Edwards promoted so
he has my vote on Feb 5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #98
99. Kicking and voting for John Edwards on Feb 5 Super Tuesday
:bounce:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiteinthewind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
100. Edwards gets my vote!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reader Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
102. Randi Rhodes says any votes for Edwards will be tossed.
According to Randi, since he has left the race, no votes for Edwards will be counted, so obviously he could NOT accrue delegates on the 5th. Can anyone verify or refute this? I'd really like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #102
104. What's her proof? NJ has received no withdrawal letter from his campaign as of yet
I just called my County Clerk's office in NJ and was told they have not received a letter of withdrawal from his campaign which means he is still on the ballot. So in that case I will vote for him. And if it is not counted regardless of whether he is in it or not, it only proves that we do not live in a Democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reader Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #104
105. I'm not sure what she's basing her statement on.
But during yesterday's show, she was adamant that any votes for Edwards would get "tossed." She seems certain that the votes won't count towards delegates.

Perhaps it's a state-by-state thing?

(I'm not trying to start a fight. I'd just like to know for sure.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #105
106. it may well be a state to state thing, which she then would have no control over
which is why her comment led me to believe she was just saying that because she supports one of the other two and wants to discourage people from exercising their right to vote for anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desertflamingo Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #106
112. EXACTLY!!
that was what i thought which makes me sooooooooo sad that even one of the most progressive voices on air would be so insidious as to spread false information to her trusting listeners (how often does she say how everything everything everything on her show is completely vetted?). ugh - politics. nasty business.

EDWARDS DEMOCRAT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desertflamingo Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #105
110. she's wrong.
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 02:06 PM by desertflamingo
i wrote to her yesterday pleading with her to do her research (which she claims to ALWAYS do) and retract her erroneous statements as many times as she made them. it's only fair. i think she's being disingenuous trying to push her audience to o or h which makes me a little sad because i generally agree with her on most topics. ah well. but she's wrong. go to je's official site and you will see many responses from bloggers on same subject. spread the word. RANDI IS WRONG!!

here's my email to randi...

randi...

i am a devoted listener and an enthusiastic cheerleader, and have been for many years; however... with all due respect, your repeated claim that voting for john edwards in the upcoming primaries would be throwing our votes away - that the ballots would be useless and tossed - is wrong. edwards has NOT dropped out - he has suspended his campaign and can still garner delegates as long as he meets a 15% threshhold. you are doing a HUGE disservice to your loyal listeners, who also have a right to vote for the candidate of their choice, by making that erroneous claim. i urge you, in fairness, to please thoroughly research this and correct it for those folks who do not have access to the internet and only have you and air america hosts as their progressive political informants. i still love you, randi, but on this i, and all the other edwards supporters AND lovers of you - the goddess of radio - implore you to make this correction as many times as you claimed the votes would not count. thank you and love you muchly (y'know, as much as a person can of a virtual stranger!)

a diehard edwards democrat from california
peace

EDWARDS DEMOCRAT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
114. I refuse to vote for globalists and traitors
Edwards will be written in if he's not on the selection. It's my protest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC