Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton = Automatic loss to McCain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:51 PM
Original message
Clinton = Automatic loss to McCain
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 03:52 PM by George_Bonanza
I have friends who are conservatives (free market conservatives, not culture warriors) and they too are enamored by the Obama campaign, and rather dismissive of the Republican field (McCain = ancient dummy, Romney = tool, Huckabee = nuts). But they've firmly told me that if the dreaded Clintons try to retake the White House, they will vote for the other candidate by default. Clinton may galvanize older white women, but that's about it, whereas Obama has the proven ability to win across all demographics.

What makes Obama so appealing? His policies are similar to Clinton's, so why do middle-of-the-road people like him so much? I think it's because they see in him passion and reason, but not rigid ideology. They get the sense that if Obama sees enough proof, he will pursue a policy that he may not have agreed with earlier. Hillary, on the other hand, is perceived as an entrenched and opportunistic liberal who will not hesitate to exact political revenge on all those who cross her path. Basically, Obama's appeal is that although you may not agree with him, he will sincerely consider your viewpoints as well, even if you know that he's going ahead with his plan. Hillary, on the other hand, will mock you and tune you out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Got some Lotto numbers for me?
It's just a bullshit guess right now. Either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Ouija boards are fun.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not another...
friends who are conservatives love Obama thread. Please, do you really expect anyone to believe this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. BUNCH OF KOOL-AID DRINKERS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. yes, another made up bullshit "friends who are conservatives love Obama" thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REDFISHBLUEFISH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama will be a 10 point loss to McCain
Rezco stuff and other things democrats are not using will QUICKLY dis-credit his whole "change" mantra.

This whole Obama thing remnds me of over confident Kerry mistakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. A Clinton run will be a 15-20 point loss
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 03:59 PM by gaiilonfong
including;
Connecticut
OHio
Florida
New Hampshire
New Mexico
Arkansas
Taylor Marshville

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. LOL
:rofl:

What exactly is their "Rezko stuff"? And what "other things" are you referring to? The Clintons have tried all they have, and it hasn't worked. They got nothing. And neither do the pukes.

What the pukes will do is try to manufacture a fall. It won't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't believe that for a moment.
I think Hillary's win over Old Man Cain would be more narrow than Obama's win over Cain. But, either would win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I'm kinda with this guy(gal)... at least I hope so 'cause either could be
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 03:58 PM by featherman
the one who gets it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rjx Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. As of now, I agree
But is it worth the risk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I say...
Go Obama!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonite Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bullshit. Nice spin though. She has as good a chance as Obama!
Don't believe the republican spin machine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rjx Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. I listen to left wing liberal radio
KGO AM 810 in San Francisco.

Everyday it seems that more and more people call up every night saying that they are a Democrat and will either not vote if Clinton gets the nominee or they will vote Republican.

As time goes on, I hear this more and more. Its sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sadly not.
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 03:56 PM by JackRiddler
Clinton = Jeb Bush 2012.

McCain = Socialist revolution by 2012.

(And I'm only slightly exaggerating.)

Obama, I'll vote for in the general. Reluctantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. that's it, I'm staying home
why bother voting.. McCain has won, just skip the election and go straight to the corination.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. stay ~ FIRED-UP FOR THE LADY~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. The new version of "Non I know likes or will vote for Hillary"
Which was destroyed as Hillary has claimed far over 1 million voters so far.

Never mind that Obama and Hillary are currently losing to McCain by about the same slim margin.

Hillary will doom us and somehow Obama will trounce the guy. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. YE of NO faith!! this is crap--and you know it don't you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. ~YES SHE Can, yes she can, YES WE CAN YES WE CAN YES SHE CAN~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. All matchup polling against the GOP validates that view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Obama does not perform statistically significantly better than Clinton
against McCain in the polls I have seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. perhaps not "significantly" better but better nonetheless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. In polls, 1% or 2% is statistically irrelevant.
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 04:05 PM by tritsofme
This far out, it means even less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Hanging your hat on 3 tenths of a pt when both are losing by less than 2 pts to McCain is silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. keep repeating: YES SHE CAN, YES WE CAN YES SHE CAN~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. I have Kleenex for you when she loses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. thanks but you keep them--and stock up--YOU will need them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. ha, ha ... we'll see
said the spider to the fly ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. Alll matchup polling? Right now their RCP avg against McCain is different by 0.3 pts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. i think it's because they see he'll be a pushover
...since he's largely unvetted, has a scandal waiting to explode, and is too inexperienced to survive the RW smear machine.

But sure, if you want to believe that your RW friends are hoping for an Obama nomination because they want to see him elected president and enacting liberal reforms, you go right ahead.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kennetha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. !00 years of war? No Jobs coming back?
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 04:04 PM by kennetha
McCain is a pro-war candidate in an anti-war climate. He says that jobs are NEVER coming back to the Rust Belt. He professes to be baffled by the economy. If Clinton is the nominee, women will be empowered and mobilized in droves.

I think there is almost no chance of him beating Clinton. There is some chance of him beating Obama, but not much. But Obama is basically a first term senator, half way through his first term, with no executive experience, no particular qualifications to be commander in chief, who is still getting a free ride in the media. Still he is a charismatic guy --as he keeps telling us - and would have the party united behind him. Plus he'd bring out a lot of young voters, probably. But don't overestimate his strengths or underestimate his weaknesses.

Also, John McCain is, I hate to say it, OLD. Against Obama, he would look like a real geezer. Even the 61 year old Clinton would look youngish in comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. YUP--THAT'S MCcain-spek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiamondJay Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:01 PM
Original message
politics is politics
would people get it that ALL politicians are calculating and get political revenge on their enemies? Reagan, and both Bushes did, why is it so wrong for Dems to also? If Obama tried to pass health care and Republicans stopped it, I would hope he would make their lives miserable. Also, I think it is too early for republicans to know what they would do if Clinton were nominated. I think because she IS more idealogical than Bill, and is older, she will come off as more genuine to those who saw Bill as "Slick Willie" even when in reality he was only slick about the bullshit sex scandals. The media says Clinton will get killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. Either candidate will win
if the democrats show up in sufficient numbers, as they have been doing.

It is just that Obama may have a larger victory because of cross-overs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
27. BULLSHIT......
have a nice day (or not).

I have republican family members who can't wait to vote for Hillary Clinton. Even my previously bush fan brother-in-law who has decided that women are inherently more suited for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
28. That sums up my entire family

conservatives, but not culture warriors. Live in Arizona. Aren't very happy with John McCain, think Mittens looks too much like a car salesman, well a NEW car salesman, and besides, their neighbors here are all Mormon... and my family doesn't really like the Mormons here, and they are just plain scared of Huckster.

But to a person, they will vote McCain over Hillary. Even my democratic leaning sister. Her husband has her brainwashed on the Clintons. But Obama... I think about 50 percent (especially my younger nieces and nephew and their spouses) will vote for Obama.

But not Clinton.

Totally anecdotal evidence. And if McCain is the repuke nominee, AZ is NOT in play for either Obama or Hillary. But I'd say Obama would make even AZ not a cakewalk for the "you kids get off my yard" McCain.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
36. I agree - I have Rethug relatives who say the same
While it is no guarantee they would vote for Obama - they are socially liberal enough to at least consider it.

Somehow, they feel that McPain "isn't really" all that conservative despite facts to the contrary. It remains a personality thing.

They HATE Hillary - they do not hate Barack.

Other family members are such Hillary fans that they cannot believe she would lose to anyone.

Family gatherings are lively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
38. My Republican father and Democratic mother are voting for Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. McInsane with be the next president
And there's not thing one anyone can do about it.
The M$M and military freaks have won already.
I will still vote for Edwards, but I might as well vote for Denny Crane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Mcain cannot beat HRC and can probably not beat Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. I hope you're right
But this militaristic shitstain will just rally the freaks. And if Huckabee is his VP, fuck he'll probably die in office and leave us with Huckster as jesus-in-chief.
Someone tell me I'm hallucinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
40. No. Take it from me and my eight years in pol. polling. NOT gonna happen. Think of a better way..
to trash HRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. Dead on.
HRC will get eviscerated in a general election and here's how McCain will do it - by attacking her on the Iraq War and terrorism. He will make her look both weak, and like a hypocrite when he brings up her war vote, continued wishy washiness on the war and her close ties with defense contractors.

We are sooo fucked if she gets the nom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
44. I have more reasons than just her electibility factor
to dislike Hillary but yes, that is factor number one and I've said it from Day One. If her last name weren't Clinton, she'd have had her ass laughed out of this race for her lack of credentials, not to mention her VERY high negatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
45. heard the same logic from my Repug neighbors...
Obama is becoming more acceptable to them than McCain but Hillary? No Way! They'll go out of their way to elect McCain. I know Hillary's supporters don't want to hear all this but they need to come to terms with the fact that an HRC nomination most likely will give us a McCain president. I don't think that's a risk worth taking.

GoBama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
46. OMG this has been out since January 2007 when the other candidate
started to run that if he should steal the nomination he would loose to ANY OF THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES.

Now his supporters so damn desperate, are starting to try to pull it out of the hat and say Hillary would loose to McCain....she had more votes in Florida against ANY of the republicans and more votes than the last three republicans combined. Florida is a representative state.

She didn't campaign in Michigan, the other candidate had non stop radio ads run by conyers...he didn't win she did.

She didn't campaign in Florida, the other candidate did his own non-stop radio ads ..he didn't win she did.

So the desperation is really beginning to show isn't it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC