If * wins in Nov. - Democratic Underground

PragMantisT

(893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 05:27 PM
Original message

If * wins in Nov.

Will Hillary kick Jeb's ass in '08?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

dawgman

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message

1. if w wins in nov. there may not be an 08

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

MoonRiver

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message

2. No, cause the vote will be permanently fixed for Repukes.

We're deep into third world banana republic mode if * steals another 4.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

leyton

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #2

7. There was life after Reagan...

Please, people. Calm down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

R3dD0g

(625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #7

8. Reagan was legitimately elected, both times.

Granted it was against pitiful Dem opponents, but his legitimacy was never questioned - even by me and I will be dancing the day he dies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Yavin4

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #7

9. Reagan Also Had A Strong Democratic Congress

That kept him in check. Back then, the Dems passed laws explicitly forbidding Reagan from invading Nicaragua. That's why Ollie and McFarland had to sell arms to Iran to fund the Contras.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

MoonRiver

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #7

12. That was before the era of BBV.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

progressiverealist

(460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message

3. my guess is he'd push to repeal the ammendment that limits him

from running for a third (and fourth, fifth, sixth term.

I don't think hed be successful- Pugs won't have THAT big of a majority.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Nailzberg

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #3

6. Let him repeal it, we'll put up the BIG DOG again!

Edited on Mon Mar-29-04 06:06 PM by Nailzberg

Bill Clinton v. Bush. Could you imagine the voter turnout?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Nicholas D Wolfwood

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 05:33 PM
Response to Original message

4. If Chimp wins in November

I hope there will be some serious civil disobedience going on. No ****ing way we can deal with him for 4 more years!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Kazak

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 05:33 PM
Response to Original message

5. IF (big if) * wins legit (ain't happenin')...

There's no way he finishes his second term. Impeachment by the second year of his second term, for sure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Yavin4

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message

10. If Bush* Wins Again...

Then our economy will completely collapse in 2006. After that, God only knows what comes next.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Yavin4

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 06:38 PM
Response to Original message

11. If Bush* Wins Again

Then our economy will completely collapse in 2006. After that, God only knows what comes next.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

TowelBoy

(142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message

13. No offense...

but I think some of you are being a tad rediculous. It's not like the country's going to blow up. I don't want Bush to win at all, but if he does... I'm pretty sure we'll live. I mean... the cons felt this way about Clinton's second term.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

sadiesworld

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #13

14. Difference:

The "cons" had no rational reason to oppose a second Clinton term, we've got plenty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

usscole

(47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Mar-29-04 09:41 PM
Response to Original message

15. Pataki or Giuliani

I think that the Republicans will not want to nominate a Senator or Representative because of the difficulties in defending a career of votes, but they will also want to continue to claim an advantage on the terrorism issue. Answer - Pataki or Giuliani.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Thu May 16th 2024, 08:30 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.