... been posting on the Gallup numbers. They both are likely accurate for what they are. It's how they are being portrayed that's the issue.
Here's the IBD story (
http://www.investors.com/editorial/feature.asp?v=5/11).
Read through it. BOY, that's not biased reporting, huh? -
"Bush leads Kerry 46% to 41%... In an IBD/TIPP poll taken April 16-22, Bush led by four points in a three-man race." (That's the "increase" they're talking about? 1%?! Possibly 0.1% with rounding off?)
-
"While Bush dominates among the early deciders (58% to 37%), Kerry is gaining among more recent deciders (70% to 24%)." (Doesn't that mean Bush just keeps the staunch Republicans, but Kerry is attracting the undecideds by a vast majority?)
-
"Intensity of support among Bush voters is much stronger than support for Kerry" (DUH!)
-
"Kerry also lags Bush in tapping his party's constituencies." (aren't all three of these basically a different measures of the same thing? That Republicans automatically vote Repub, while Dems and independents actually think about their votes?)
-
"Only 11% of Democrats say they are "very satisfied" with the choice of candidates in this year's election and 59% are "somewhat satisfied." This contrasts with 42% of Republicans who are "very satisfied" and 37% who are "somewhat satisfied." (SO. Maybe the Repubs are satisfied with Kerry as a choice, too? A meaningless poll question painted to look good for Bush)
- Then there's this:
"Bush's presidential leadership ratings, as measured by the IBD/TIPP Presidential Leadership Index, also rose - from 49.5 in April to 51.8 in May, a gain of 4.5%. " (Fuzzy math, I guess)
Look at the graphic in the article. Bush's "Presidential Leadership Index" (whatever that is) is
still on a steep decline, in the big picture.
One-poll bumps mean nothing in the big picture. The Gallup poll of yesterday means a lot because it is a continued decline after the last poll, and it confirms the overall trend of all of their polls of the last several months; a trend that is replicated in every other poll, including this IBD/TIPP poll. Of course, the reporting on yesterday's CNN/Gallup results has been biased as well. Funny how a statistically meaningless change is always reported as "Bush increasing his lead" when it's in his favor, and always "Bush stays even despite problems" when it's not.
But either way, the results are still bad for Bush.