|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:10 AM Original message |
Why not Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
1. I can see the Bush political ad already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:33 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. You're right about Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:47 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Still can't find a link for the Rabin lie, by the way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 10:00 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Rabin gaffe - easy google search. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 10:09 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Keep reading that article. (Ready to feel like an idiot?) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cuban_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 10:29 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Stop posting facts, AP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:12 PM Response to Reply #22 |
46. The quote does not contradict the story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:17 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. It's an anonymous rumor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:22 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Sure it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 05:42 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. I'll repost my previous post: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 06:34 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. You thought your strongest argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 06:52 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. You know why this is especially hypocritical:Clark gets criticized by Brit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 06:57 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Why is this about Clark? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 06:59 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Because that makes the point beautifully that criticisms based on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 05:01 AM Response to Reply #60 |
81. Avoiding this thread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 03:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
37. "victims of corporate negligence" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:07 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. If he won the case, they were negligent. And he sued their employers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:33 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. If he won the case... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 05:50 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Deleted message |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 05:57 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Changing practices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 06:58 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. Now read the record in THIS case. Edwards won this case because the nurse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 07:05 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. For emphasis: your quote says that the problem with FHM is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 07:09 PM Response to Reply #55 |
62. I'm really looking forward to a response to these previous two posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 07:38 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Sigh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:19 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Deleted message |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 10:40 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Looking forward to a response to the post above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 11:18 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. I'll accept a check, in any installments you choose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 11:24 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Go read Four Trials. The baby was born breach. The FHM suggested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 11:27 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. In other words, THIS WASN'T A FALSE POSITIVE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 11:36 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Interestingly, it's the NYT that reported this study back in '96. Hmm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 01:02 AM Response to Reply #70 |
78. Something confusing about these conclusions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 11:41 PM Response to Reply #67 |
71. Again, looking forward to responses... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 11:45 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. And here are the full texts of both studies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 11:50 PM Response to Reply #67 |
73. The conclusion of the first study: too many false positives, so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 11:57 PM Response to Reply #67 |
74. The second study says this (Edwards still looking pretty good). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 12:03 AM Response to Reply #67 |
75. More from the second study (and thank you again for these articles... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 12:06 AM Response to Reply #67 |
76. And the only thing they say about rates of CP holding steady is this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 02:00 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. This is going nowhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 08:15 AM Response to Reply #79 |
85. I know you would have done that happily. You still would have been wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 08:41 AM Response to Reply #79 |
86. Here's something interesting I just found: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 12:49 AM Response to Reply #1 |
77. This is just silly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hornito (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
2. Simple, and as you've pointed out...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doosh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:44 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. and how about the delusional and annoying cult of Clarkies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hornito (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. YOU, are wrong. I've disliked Edwards long before Clark was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 03:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
35. We overwhelmed this place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. It didn't take long for Clark to win all the DU polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
39. Deleted message |
Cuban_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 10:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
28. 'Flyweight'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkamber (507 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 11:49 AM Response to Reply #2 |
32. As a woman...I get tired of this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 11:53 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. that was EXACTLY my experience as well--also I read an article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hornito (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
3. Sorry, double post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
4. The 'channeling' thing is complete BULLSHIT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:43 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. An aside here (I've addressed the heart of this matter before)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:46 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. That's not all it will ever be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:48 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I would LOVE to have this election turn on Edwards's work as a lawyer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 10:18 AM Response to Reply #10 |
23. Horseshit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doosh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
6. how about Clark wanting to start World War 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 10:26 AM Response to Reply #6 |
26. The British officer who made that statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cuban_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 11:35 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. The 'channeling' thing is also a vast distortion of the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 03:58 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. That was a direct quote from his closing statements. His own words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:04 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. Um, no they weren't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
48. The *SPIN* isn't a 'direct quote'! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 07:26 PM Response to Reply #26 |
63. Ah, yes. That's why we don't trust anonymous hearsay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
9. By the way, informed voters like Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Oh really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:55 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Are you channeling something we don't know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:56 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Like every one of the participants read the NY Times article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 10:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Despite your efforts, this story doesn't stick. People like the fact that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cuban_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 11:33 AM Response to Reply #20 |
30. The additional point being that none of it's NEW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
14. By the way, you promissed that you were going to spend a weekend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 09:55 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I've had other matters to attend to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 10:03 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Why don't you stop wasting your time rehashing BS, and get down to the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 10:21 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Yes, she did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 10:25 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. And it's HIGH-LARIOUS that after making that promise, all she did was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cuban_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 10:32 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. It was debunked YEARS ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
34. I think Edwards would be great on the ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
38. ## Support Democratic Underground! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
41. Man, this shit is TOO FUCKING FUNNY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
42. It's simple, he's not a long serving DINO who can take a Red state... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:10 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. It's also tempting to pick someone who'll definitely win in 2012, and that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VOX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
49. Why not Edwards indeed? He would make an outstanding veep candidate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 05:11 AM Response to Reply #49 |
83. I guess all of the Bush supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
citizen snips (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-16-04 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
52. I can tell the Edwards bias will never end. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ngGale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 02:13 AM Response to Reply #52 |
80. The same right wing that has run Kerry into... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 05:08 AM Response to Reply #52 |
82. Well they'll be joining an already crowded bandwagon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 05:19 AM Response to Reply #82 |
84. Prove your statement, Skwmom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moderator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-17-04 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
87. Locking...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC