Will the Clintons denounce and renounce this man?

For war crimes, unconstitutional torture and neglect of the American people. Yeah..no? oh well.

It's BS.

Funny how those matters so serious and left outstanding ended up deep-sixed throughout the 90s, eh?

pursuit of Bin Laden, health care, etc.

I don't understand why you imply that the Clintons have not denounced them. and the "renounce" part makes so little sense I won't even go there.

When point it out this sh*t is stupid.

Some of the stuff they are saying about Hillary is just plain nuts. And there is a HUGE flood of "Hillary Did It Too" threads, a long-time favorite -- only most of things they're throwing at her are completely off the wall.

But the fact that they are now railing against guilt-by-association is almost too much. It's been a mainstay of their anti-Hillary campaign. Remember Keith Olbermann's Special Comment when Geraldine Ferarro shot her fool mouth off? I'm still waiting for its companion piece about Rev. Wright, a story that broke four days later, but which had been the subject of concern by the Obama campaign for months.

This isn't at the level of irony, or even hypocrisy -- it's a total disconnect, a mirror image of reality, and it's from emotions in overdrive. The "Bitter ________s for Obama" stickers is a similar reaction from the BHO stalwarts. They don't seem to realize that most voters won't see that as an irony-laced jab, but a reminder of a painful gaffe.

In politics, it is not a Good Thing to lose control over anything, especially one's reactions. It applies to Hillary and her team as much as Obama and his. But consider who is doing what.

--p!

bill from ct