Is it elitist to want superdelegates to override the will of primary and caucus voters?
To have a bunch of politicians and party hacks spit in the will of Democratic primary voters and caucus voters who cast their ballots in lawful primaries and caucuses because they claim to know what's best for the party? That strikes me as very elitist, and appalling that a candidate would base her whole campaign around this outcome.
Every time I see one of those the SDs will step in and give Hillary the nomination posts, I can't help but wonder how infuriated these same people were when the Supreme Court stepped in and gave W the presidency.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.