Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's wrong with being elitist????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:58 PM
Original message
What's wrong with being elitist????
I am more educated than 98% of the voting populace. I'm sure I read more newspapers than the average voter (in French, German, and Arabic). I don't mind reading Congressional bills and Supreme Court opinions. So I am smarter and more informed, and more educated than the average voter. Why would I NOT be elitist? Why would I not think I'm more correct than others? I was right about the war. I've been right about pretty much every policy issue since 2000. It ain't rocket science (by the way, I'm pretty good at rocket science). This elitist charge is hoisted by people like me who are smarter and more educated and who understand that the lesser educated have a HUGE chip on their shoulders and wish to tap into that inferiority. Look, I ain't running for office, so I can say this shit. BUT DU seems to be the most glorious elitist place out there. We know we're both more informed and smarter than the chimps over at freeperland.

Here's my favorite reminder: no matter how much more informed I am than my 19 year-old niece who's drunk on American Idol and facebook, her vote counts as much as mine. This keeps me humble (and afraid).

Elitists unite.

By the way, lattes do not the elitist make. I drink my cheap coffee black. Lots of my fat, white trash community members form a big, fat heart-attack-to-be line outside the local Starbucks. Yet, again, I suppose I feel myself superior in my over-educated blue-collaredness, working class coffee to their overweight wanna-be yuppie-hipster Starbucks-drinking, war-mongering, flag-pin-wearing, tailgate-support-our-trooops-decal-posting-shittiness.

I also like imported beer and microbrews.

Oh yeah . . . :rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pardon me?


But do you have any Grey Poupon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. But of course.
It's funny, my mustard snobbery knows NO bounds.

You like French's? As far as I can tell, YOU SUCK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Knowing you're more informed and acting like a superiour tool
are different things. Being the former is great. Doing the latter is the mark of an insecure egoist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. You mean like using British spelling?
Sure sign of douchery. Unless you're British or Canadian. If so, may I suggest sacrifice tradition for efficiency and the Great Vowel shift.

If you're American, then your uncosncious elitism knows NO bounds. Quit being so self-loathing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I cannot change my education, twatter
No more than you can magically change your obvious personality disorder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You've made my point.
"I cannot change my education"

'nuff said.

It seems our mutual insults (neither of which exude signs of elitism) are a match made in heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Your point being that Britons, Canadians, and possibly Australians
are elitists because their language has evolved differently? How the hell does that embarrassingly stupid post justify your attitude? And I'll point out that I didn't call you anything in my original post, I was only answering your (weakly rhetorical) question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Nobody spells "superior" that way.
You're both being tools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. This subthread went well beyond that single word, but
there are many instances of "superiour" out there in non-American English. Some US courts even use that spelling. It is not the standard spelling anymore, and to that extent you're right, but to say "nobody" uses it defies reality. As for me, it may have been the influence of a classroom poster of Samuel Johnson with the caption, "a man of superiour cognitive sagacity." I sat right next to it and it always felt like he was staring at me (and he wasn't exactly a looker, a bit like the Hitchcock of your avatar but even grumpier and with a wig, lol). But it actually got me into reading Johnson, if for no other reason than to see if he warranted such big words. He does. Yes, I'm rambling in response to a simple snark, but it's Friday night and I'm not ready to go to bed, so there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:05 PM
Original message
As it's used, it carries a lot of negatives....
The way Hillary is trying to use it, it means those who are separated by the mainstream, who think they are better than "regular" people, who look down their noses, who are out of touch with the masses, etc.

I see the problem with eliitests like the Clintons in the fact that they want to keep power and privilege amongst their fellow elites.

Finally, if you haven't read this book, I strongly suggest you do. It was part of the required reading in a critical thinking class I had to take for my second degree (the first degree was obtained so long ago we were using clay tables and stylus): "The Irony of Democracy."

It changed forever the way I see our country, our government, and who the true ruling class is.

After you read it, look on line for discussion groups about it. By far, some of the most brainiac and forward-thinking people I've ever encountered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. As Hillary uses it, it carries a lot of negative baggage....
Edited on Fri May-02-08 07:10 PM by PoliticalAmazon
She uses it as an attack, with the implications that her target is out of touch with the masses, thinks they are better than the masses, etc.

The irony, of course, is that Hillary and BIll are of the Elite American class and, like their fellow Elites, are trying to keep power and privilege in the Elite class.

If you've not read "The Irony of Democracy," I would highly suggest it. It was required reading in a critical thinking class I took to get my second degree (when I got my first degree we were still using clay tablets and stylus). It changed forever the way I think of my country, my ancestors, and especially our political process.

It was one of those "before and after" experiences that don't happen very often in our lives.

After you read it, check out some of the discussion groups online. By far, some of the biggest forward-thinking brainiacs I've ever encountered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. You don't sound like an elitist...
just an asshole;) the only qualification for being an elitist is thinking one is superior to others. That being said, I think we all qualify sometimes......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nothing, as long as its the right kind of elitist
Theres the traditional usage of the term "elitist", which used to exclusively mean "Rockefeller rich beyond reason" type that wants to win an election to further the economic wellbeing of people like them.

Then theres the more recent type created by the GOP in the last 30 years that means "dont trust him 'cause he's smarter than me" type who has come to be the antithesis of every policy the conservatives love.

We have both kinds represented by our two candidates, choosing the wrong type will only add to the damage our country has suffered in the last 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. There's nothing wrong with BEING those things
It's looking down on others who don't that people have a problem with.

Not everyone has the same opportunities, particularly with college. I know a lot of people who won't send their kids to college for various reasons. Some people manage it themselves, others don't, and don't necessarily have the tools to do so, or enough of a support network to enable them to. I have a friend like this. Definitely college material, but his parents had no interest in sending him. He tried community college for a while, then wanted to go to a liberal college in NYC. But he never did it. Now he's 27, feels he's too old (he's not, but he feels that he is) and is working in a bookstore where he got promoted to manager. Going to college now would just be hard for him. He's outside of most financial aid categories, so he'd need a loan, his family is not supportive, and he feels stuck. I sympathize with him. I don't look down on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I have friends who make twice as much as I do who do contracting or auto work.
They mock me for my lack of home repair and auto-repair skills. They are quite elitist when I try to skimp on spark plugs and/or brake pads.

My point, which of course is being lost on people who NEED to be offended, is that we're all elitist in some way. I am politically.

But I know absolutely shit about 10,678 various things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. In a way, they have a point. It reminds me of a funny story.
My sister used to refuse to pump her own gas (she does it now). So we're getting gas in her car, and I told her that I'd pump it for her. I get out and I absolutely cannot open the cap. It has instructions on it to press and turn. It won't come off and won't come off. So she gets out and tries, too - of course since she didn't pump her own gas, she didn't know how either. We tried for about five minutes. Finally, I had to swallow my pride and go ask the guy in the station to do it (I was so-o embarrassed). The guy comes out, COMPLETELY IGNORES THE INSTRUCTIONS, turns the cap without pressing it in and it pops right off. By then we were both as red as beets. I'm sure he got a laugh out of it later. I still don't know WHY it had those wrong instructions, but it just goes to show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Insightful as usual
You hit on a great point, and I think being an elitist definintely involves not feeling sympathy/empathy for people and their life circumstances. It's the assumption that anyone not at the elitist's level isn't at their level because they're inherently inferior.

(PS It seems the Pistons' booty holes are still quite relaxed :) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. LOL, do you think anyone knows what you're talking about?
I think I am an elitist because I can get the NBA channel and find these things out. That was the funniest thing I'd heard on TV in a while and there was no one but me to hear it - SO was out walking the dogs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. I like it, good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. kick for fine adjectives!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. My my, aren't you arrogant. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. We are democrats
We are all elitist in some way or another....do we think we are better than the idiots who vote GOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Perfectly fine to be it's just barack is wrongly labelled and ti is hypocrisy from McClintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adams Wulff Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. I said it before, I'll say it again...





In a presidential race with a former First Lady and a son of admiralty who married into a vast beer fortune, it's the black guy who has to prove he's not "elitist"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
25. Yeah, there's nothing wrong with thinking your better than others
and looking down on people not like you. I mean, look where it got Hitler and company. Man, them sure were some good times.

Douche. You better remember that there's a whole lot more of them common folks out there than there ever will be of you, and that if you want to have any chance at all of getting them to vote your way, you will have to go to them hat in hand to present your case. Acting like the very GOP stereotype of "limousine liberals" sure won't help you none. You are what's costing us elections, so go crawl back under the rock from whence you came and stop running your mouth in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Exhibit A, to supplement my post below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Like I said, you'll never be the majority
Poignant enough that you should brandish an Obama avatar. He'll lose for the very same reasons. But I guess you're content with never getting to have any influence about anything, as long as you can scoff at the common man and sit around and feel superior. Quite frankly, fuck you and the flea-bitten mule you rode in on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. It isn't "the common man." It's a particular culture of some
Maybe even many, but not everyone, and hopefully not a majority. It's the culture of anti-intellectualism that acts like being well educated, well traveled and well experienced is a liability - something that literally makes one who is those things inferior to everyone else.

Not only is that ludicrously irrational, it can easily be traced to the sorry state of affairs we are currently in.

So scoff at the averaged, reasoned, intellectually curious common man? No. You don't need advanced degrees to be wise, open minded and a critical honest thinker. Scoff at the condensing anti-intellectual who usually turns out to be an ultra-conservative anyway? You betcha.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
26. Josh Lyman: I am an elitist, but I have a healthy respect for people who don't measure up.
:rofl:

There people who are condescending and smug who look down on others - that's real elitism.

Then there are people who SEE anyone with more knowledge, insight or experience as arrogant, because they are threatened or insecure - they throw the label "elitist" around anytime they're in an experience where they wish they were smarter or had more education but are standing next to someone who reminds them that they don't.

By the way, I am an elitist. Stupid people who lack intellectual curiosity and disdain those who possess it are the reason why this country is the mess that it is. It isn't just that our education system needs to be better, and economic inequality needs to be better so everyone has the same opportunities to quality education. That would help, but not until we address American culture. It is a culture of anti-intellectualism. There are a large number of Americans who take pride in being fucking stupid, and mock and ridicule others who are exceptionally smart and engaged on the issues, as though that was something to criticize. Upon being presented with every educational opportunity in the world, they still wouldn't take it. We have a culture that celebrates being "ordinary" and "simple" which translates into "ignorant." If you get too much education, pay too much attention, use too much of your brain, suddenly there's something wrong with you to a large group of Americans.

Personally, I want someone so stupefiyingly-smarter-than-me to be President. I want to feel moronic in his or her presence. I want him or her to be the most highly educated, well versed, well traveled human-of-the-world genius that I feel ashamed of my life in comparison. That's who I think should lead the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
28. Urban Dictionary ....... don't think you will like it
1. twatwaffle

twatwaffle (twat-wah-full):
n.1 An elitist; someone unaware of their own limitations and highly critical of others.
n.2 A general prick. See: douchebag, n00b.
v.1 To ban; to totally pwn.

"That Tom Cruise is such a twatwaffle."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
30. Depends on definition of "elitist." Smart and educated = GOOD. Looking down on others = BAD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
32. You may be more well-read; I daresay I'm pretty good there, also. But
your humanity is a tad underwhelming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
33. I don't mind elitism. I do mind self-righteousness and asshatism. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
34. Hey. folks -- I think this is *satire*
Maybe not up to the level of A Modest Proposal, but satire none the less.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
35. Absolutely nothing wrong with being a member of an elite group
just as there's nothing wrong with being a member of a particular race, or being a particular sex, or of a particular age. I'll let you add the 'ist' to each of those and see where that leads.

Any '...ist' tendency is rooted in the belief that not being a member of a particular group indicates weakness, inability or turpitude of some sort. For all of your niece's perceived weaknesses, it's useful to remember that she's also right, at least sometimes. The idea that membership in an elite provides superior decision making capability has been effectively challenged:

see James Surowiecki, The Wisdom of Crowds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
36. nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC