|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
JanErikFl (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:23 PM Original message |
Obama leads with 211 votes in Guam, 1900 votes not counted. Still Obama fans is cheering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanErikFl (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. This limit is for new discussion threads only. There is no restriction on the number of replies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. I see you have a problem with math: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I wonder how that happened; DU usually locks posters after 3. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. They know about it now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Who knows... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #11 |
25. You're not allowed to post more than 3 - the software stops you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. It didn't stop the OP, thus my question. Weird. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 07:29 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I'm guessing 1 of 3 things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Hmmm, food for thought! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
2. Obama fans "is" cheering? Is that anything like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Damn ! You beat me to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. You have to be quick to catch a rat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JanErikFl (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. Obama's 6% win in Guam win a full 2/3 of way to MASSIVE, DOUBLE-DIGIT VICTORY Clinton had in PA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. cross posting? HRC did not get a double digit win in PA... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. He is counting the digit after the decimal. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. 53/47 Obama caucus win - another couple thousand popular vote for each |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. Clinton must take 804 out of 1400 to win, that's just 57% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. And only 1 state over 57%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
16. Sounds like you need to go back to grammar school and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
17. Hey Jan, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
18. As both Clintons always say a win is a win except when they say it isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
19. Agat and Yona are counted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rainbow4321 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
20. Yeah, cuz we all know HRC waited til TX's caucus results were in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
21. Okay, NOW it's official! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 06:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Is that really a 7 'vote' difference? Unreal! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 06:30 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. When I read that the last precinct to be counted contained 27% of the population |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lojasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
23. Can we cheer now, Newb? EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-03-08 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
26. That's 'are cheering' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC