Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's $28 "in total" saved for the entire 90 Days, aka 3 Months- Don't be HILLwinked!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:38 AM
Original message
It's $28 "in total" saved for the entire 90 Days, aka 3 Months- Don't be HILLwinked!
Edited on Tue May-06-08 12:40 AM by FrenchieCat
It is not $30.00 per month.

Those with the sob story on what $30.00 per month in food means to folks,
time for a rewrite! It is what $9.33 per month in food means to folks.

If you believe it is $30.00 per month,
Post your math worksheet here.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Too stupid to see that it's about windfall profits taxes.
That's to be expected by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. And when will those windfall profits taxes be passed, Hillbot?
Next year? Because Der Chimperor sure as shit ain't gonna sign 'em. That's assuming they get past the Repuke filibusters.

In the meantime, assuming some type of un-replaced tax cut was passed, how many highway deaths are you willing to accept from un-maintained roads? How many lay-offs of highway workers would be tolerable to you?

And what will you say when the oil cos. go ahead and raise the price of gas up to what it was before, because they know you will pay it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Yeah, I'm sure Congress & Bush will be all over it by the end of summer.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. And the transformation is complete
Dateline May 6, 2008: Today in the blogosphere, hillbots have finally adopted Bush era reasoning to support bad policy. After days of Senator Clinton sucking up to "Joe Lunchbox" and presenting her "gas tax holiday" as a symbol of her deep understanding of the concerns of the little people, we now learn that it is about a desperate hope to re-re-re-re-re-re introduce the often debated but never ever passed windfall profits tax on big oil. In a logical shift reminiscent of Mr. Bush's ever evolving (devolving?) justifications of the Iraq War, the Clintonistas have finally jumped the bush shark....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. Obama is on board with that...
Edited on Tue May-06-08 01:05 AM by casus belli
He has a similar windfall taxes proposal, in fact I believe he was the first to actually suggest it. So apparently, you're not attentive enough to actually concentrate on the subject at hand - which is how she has proposed a giveaway that will never happen to distinguish her plan from Obama's, even though she knows it is neither sound nor does it have any chance of becoming a reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
36. too blind to see that that's a fake proposal?
There is no fucking way on earth that a windfall profits tax will pass the Congress and be signed into law by the chimpster, in order to pay for Hilly's faux help for working families. It's a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. And that's assuming you don't use public transportation.
Even assuming that this charade actually cuts gas prices, the millions of people who used public transporation to go to work will see just about zero benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. They've officially jumped the shark with this one.
Why they think the smart and savvy people on DU will be fooled by their puerile Taylor Marsh talking points is beyond me.

Note to Hillbots: We're not your Low Information Voters here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Cause they don't take advice from "elite" Economists.......
and they don't like math. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malletgirl02 Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Paul Krugman
I wonder if they still want Paul Krugman's support, after even he came out against the tax holiday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. And Obama is saving us what? Nothing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. He just doesn't think we should go down that bad road.
And I agree with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. He's saving us from FantasyLand-SpaceMountain pandering, for one.
I appreciate the honestly. Your mileage may vary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yeah , right. And his parents were brought together by Selma too. Talk about fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Nice subject change.
Could've sworn we were talking about the gas tax, but I'll play....



Are we even? So, back to the gas tax relief that Hillary promised this summer, how's that going? When do you think it'll get through committee, be passed by the House and Senate and signed by the President (without a signing statement)? You've got twenty days for her to keep her promises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. I'm just glad that there are certain folks I simply ignore........
Like whomever you're talking to. Feels peaceful. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. If you dare to critique the Hail-Pander thrown by The Queen, expect "SELMA!!!!!" as a response.
That's all you need to know. :-) Of course, you probably already knew that.

:hi: Frenchie!! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. He pushed for something similar when he was in the Illinois
Edited on Tue May-06-08 12:52 AM by nadinbrzezinski
senate, and saw how well it worked NOT

He (and them elitist economists who are also saying it is pandering and will not work) have seen how this doesn't work

By the way... I am not a partisan for either but this little piece of factoid struck me as well, interesting

Now I don't know about you, but I'd take the word of Nobel Laureates over those of a candidate who took this BAD idea from HER REPUBLICAN opponent, and who cannot even deliver since the Senate has said no. Another little piece of data here ok... after all they don't want to give any weapons to John McCain

There are days that the mind just reels (and this week it is hillary's supporters mind to make my mind reel... I am sure next week it will be an Obamanite or two... since both are machine politicians)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. saracat, honest to god, are the roads here in AZ not bad enough for you?
Is that 10 bucks a month in fuel savings worth the damage to your car and the potential for injury or death?

Does your hatred for Obama blind you to basic common sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
37. Don't know much about how IDOT is funded do you?
Or what funds can be used for road repair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. About 75% from the Federal Highway fund.
Don't even try. I used to recruit civil engineers for highway projects, in a previous job. I'm no transportation expert, but I know a thing or two about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. The point is the funds are already allotted and had been years ago . There are other sources of
Edited on Tue May-06-08 01:30 PM by saracat
revenue for maintenance. The Gas Holiday will not jeopardize any of our roads but hey let your hatred of Hillary blind you to everything.I was not a Hillary fan and still feel that I would prefer another but Obama is an empty suit offering no substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Years ago??!? Do you have any idea how budgets work?
Never mind. :banghead:

As for "other sources" you DO realize what state you live in, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Yes. And I just met with some folks at ADOT. Get over yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. He is saving us a shitload of construction jobs and from falling bridges & road deaths.
I'll pay $10/mo for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. To some people $28 is alot of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. What kind of cars do they drive and how much??? It's not even 10 gallons of gas.
Sheesh!! What a stupid freaking claim!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Did I say anything about gas? Do you really believe there are people in this country that wouldn't
be happy to have an extra $28??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampshireDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. An extra $28?
What, is Hillary gonna send us all a check, and we can pay her back $.15 at a time each time we tank up with gas?

I mean, how willfully ignorant do you have to be to make such a claim? Or how stupid do you think the rest of us are? Do you think we don't have bills to pay and checkbooks to balance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. It's NOT even that! That's a myth, too. The prices would go up immediately.
After all, they'd rationalize, it'd just be taxed as a "windfall profit" right? Wrong. It'd pull the fastest disappearing act seen since Enron. Intermediaries and agents NOT included in the "windfall profit" legislation and magically increased expenses.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. Exactly - I just did my calculation
Edited on Tue May-06-08 01:01 AM by RamboLiberal
I drive about 350-450 miles a week in the summer in a vehicle that averages 22 mpg. My savings would be around $15 a month.

She's pandering.

1 - No way this gets passed in the next few weeks.
2 - Bush won't sign it.
3 - Most likely not enough votes to override veto.

And btw where the hell is the bill?

And even if it passed what the hell we going to do in the winter when a lot of us are back to high heating prices and the tax goes back in to effect.

I'd rather see this money go into serious research to get us off fossil fuels.

Right now a lot of jawing needs to be done with oil companies and oil producers to get the costs down to manageable levels with a serious talk to Americans to cut their love for big-ass SUVs and pickups. Make it patriotic to drive the gas-sippers not the gas-guzzlers. And government and automakers ought to partner in a landing on the moon type project to get hybrids, electric, hydrogen, etc. affordable vehicles on the market in great quantities.

Jimmy Carter was the prophet we didn't listen to. Damn the Repukes and damn Reagan and the Bushes! And damn all their minions with the big mouths on the media.

Also why in the hell didn't the Bill Clinton administration see this coming? Losing the congress he sure squandered that opportunity.

BTW, what the hell is she going to say at the convention or in the fall if she stole the nomination when she doesn't deliver????? Sorry, McCain and I were just pandering?????

Here's a good calculator. http://www.philly.com/inquirer/multimedia/Gas_tax_calculator.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Plus, there's no way in hell Chimpy will sign a windfall profits tax!
So the soonest we'd see that is sometime next year, if at all. That means we'd be borrowing money to maintain highways in the meantime, or just not working on them. Great. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
21. The bigger point is it doesn't matter if it WAS $30 a month
It won't happen, and she knows she can't make it happen. She hasn't explained how she will force oil companies to pay it, and she hasn't defined what sort of protections she will put in place to make sure they don't turn around and compensate themselves with a price increase.

Nor does it make any sense in how she is playing this. She's running for the presidency and is using this as a platform when it will come into play months before the GE even takes place. It's pandering, pure and simple - a plan she know can't pass muster in Congress proposed far enough into the future as to have an effect on elections happening now even though she knows that there won't be any plan come summer. She might as well start talking about emptying the treasury and giving it to the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TragedyandHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
24. Kick for the mathematically challenged
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
26. $28 average over 90 days is a best case scenario.
The more likely scenario is that gas prices drop temporarily, then quickly climb back to their previous level.

Oil companies know that consumers are willing to pay $4.00/gallon. Do you really think Exxon's going to give up potential profit just so the average family can eat at McDonald's one more time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
30. It's a shell game, like Obama said......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
31. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
32. It's worse than that. Hillary's acting like if we don't get this specific $28 we will get no tax
Edited on Tue May-06-08 04:33 AM by ecdab
breaks at all. As if a $28 tax break that hurts the environment and helps the oil companies is the best way to provide tax relief to those who need it. Shameless pandering - that's all this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Well, we know she's shameless......
by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
34. Well for me it is $0.00 because I am a good progressive
and use public transportation. So what, all you Obama folks still drive? Pfftt progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
35. the repercussions will cause the price to jump much higher than the savings will cover.
hillary would destroy this place with her "experience" and dismissal of "economics"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC