Question: If we say the winner of each state gets that states electorial votes, who would be ahead?
LiberalArkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:43 PM
Original message
Question: If we say the winner of each state gets that states electorial votes, who would be ahead?
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
spin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
Edited on Tue May-06-08 07:17 PM by spin
Fearless
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. It doesn't matter. The rules are the rules regardless.
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. and bugger the voters?
enki23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:45 PM
Original message
if we say each state allocates delegates according to what its highest grossing porn star says...
cottonseed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Edited on Tue May-06-08 06:46 PM by cottonseed
He'd win more hypotheticals than Hillary would win -- hypothetically.
End Of The Road
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Kittycat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. It doesn't matter - We aren't republicans.
gmudem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
They would say the Lieberwoman campaign needs to stop whining and follow the rules as she agreed to them in the first place.
TBF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. What is it with Hillary supporters and inability to do math -
Obama is ahead and NC has more delegates than Indiana. Try to add it up, Einstein.
AZ Criminal JD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Try a course in reading comp. You won't look so foolish.
TBF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. And inability to stay on topic.
We aren't writing essays here, bamalib. We are talking about politics and delegates. Try to keep up.
gmudem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
Edited on Tue May-06-08 06:48 PM by gmudem
cui bono
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. No hypothetical questions please.
leeman67
(535 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. If rats had wings, they'd be bats.
Connie_Corleone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. If monkeys flew out my butt...
It doesn't matter. The Democratic Party rules call for proportional delegates.
LiberalArkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. I am sorry, but I thought in the end (The General) that was what mattered.
Aloha Spirit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Different rules means different games, different strategies. Pointless question.
DemGa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Lucky 13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
JerseygirlCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. That's just not a logical measure
They won't be competing against one another in the general. Head to head comparisons now are very different from a contest against McCain then. There's no chance that say, NY or CA will be going GOP, is there?
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
Notice that Obama fans can't answer that simple question. Just nasty snark.
nsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
We've let the Clinton campaign get away with proposing bullshit rule changes for long enough. It's time for us to say: No, it's over.
woolldog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. And if my Aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle....
spin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. Rasmussen Reports April 03 on your question
Alexander
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. President Gore would've given us a 50-state landslide in 2000.
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. Good question. And the answer is....?
Hamlette
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Tue May-06-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. what do you do with the states where there were more than two candidates?
Like Iowa where Hillary came in last. And changing the rules at the end of the game is unfair. Obama might have run a different race had that been the measure.
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Wed May 15th 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.