Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: For Clinton, a Misfire on Gas Tax?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:12 AM
Original message
WP: For Clinton, a Misfire on Gas Tax?
Brian Howey, the publisher of the Howey Political Report, a Hoosier State tip sheet, suggested several key differences between the two races that can explain the drastically different outcomes.

The first, said Howey, is that the local Indiana media "relentlessly hammered" Clinton's gas tax proposal -- using local economists to dismiss the merits of the plan. O'Bannon faced nowhere near the level of scrutiny and negative coverage back in 2000.

"It had been 21 years (1979) since the last fuel shock," explained Howey of the O'Bannon race. "This time, it's been coming at us in increments over the last eight years, and I believe most Hoosiers realize there's a bigger problem."

The second major reason that Howey believes Clinton didn't gain the upper hand on the issue in Indiana that she had expected is Sen. Dick Lugar's (R-Ind.) activism on energy issues over the last few years. "While this probably wouldn't poll substantially, there is a growing awareness ," said Howey. "So Hoosiers were a bit wiser when this issue came up this time."

One other explanation is possible. Rather than debate the specifics of Clinton's proposal or come out with a counter-plan of his own, Obama instead used the moment to return to his core message: Clinton was a great game player, but the time for playing games has past.

Obama put considerable faith in the idea that voters would see Clinton's plan as a campaign gimmick rather than a solution to their economic woes. It was a strategy rooted in more than guesswork, as polling leading up to the primary suggested that many Democrats no longer trusted Clinton. Exit polling in Indiana on Tuesday affirmed that sentiment, with just 53 percent of voters calling Clinton "honest and trustworthy".

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/05/_brian_howey_in_2000.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hope so
it would be a sign of progess if dumb shit like that doesn't work anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I second that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder who told her to make that an issue? I'm sure she is pissed
that it backfired. The people in Indiana were smart enough to see through her antics. The poeple of Ohio and PA believed all the shit she threw at them. YEAH, I'm a hard working girl that goes out to bars and downs shots every weekend. Whatever.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. News pundits say Bill told her to do it
Their analysis was that Bill Clinton told her to get out in front talking about gas prices because that's the first thing that people feel when the economy is in trouble. I happen to agree with Slick Willie on this one. However, Hillary took it a little too far by proposing legislation without solidifying any support for it. No economists? Not very wise. Even Bush would have paid off a couple of fake economists to back a plan that most economists disagreed with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It would have been better if she had been the one to level with the people
and to tell us honestly what it takes to get soaring prices under control...

But she tried to pull a fast one on the people, and she let Obama take the high road. What a boo boo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Much worse than a boo boo
because it gave Obama his mojo back. He looked right at home attacking Hillary and McCain's gas tax pandering. Plus it effectively muted some of the pastorbating in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC