Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Florida Paper Trail bill which led to the DNC slashing the voices of 1.7 million Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 06:51 AM
Original message
The Florida Paper Trail bill which led to the DNC slashing the voices of 1.7 million Democrats
This morning local network affiliates in South West Florida report:

Elections going back to paper ballots

Voters will no longer use an individual machine. Instead they'll fill out a paper ballot, which will be scanned into a machine. The state mandated every county switch by July 1st. The state will chip in half of the $4 million cost for the new machines.

http://www.nbc-2.com/articles/readelectionarticle.asp?articleid=19149&z=55

A synopsis of the papa trail saga

Florida's Senator Graham
May 5, 2004 - Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (Democrat, New York) and Senator Bob Graham (Democrat, Florida) presented a bill that called for a paper trail to back up electronic voting throughout the country.

"And that's what this bill is all about: assuring that each and every voter can have confidence in our elections and that when problems do arise, there can be a determination made about them -- what went wrong and how to correct it so that every vote is counted."

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/03/10/voting/index.html


Obama's Florida campaign Chairman
October 25 2004 - US Representative Robert Wexler (Democrat, Florida) (Obama's Florida campaign chairman) lost his bid to require voting machines to create a voter-verifiable paper trail. ...Citing equal protection statutes, the Wexler team argued that those Florida districts with touch screen machines would be at a comparative disadvantage if a re-count were required.

http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2004/10/65469
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/26/touch_screen_challenge/


A Republican plan with Obama's Florida campaign Chairman at his side
February 1, 2007 - Governor Crist unveiled plans to spend $32.5 million to replace touch-screen e-voting machines used by most voters across the state with optical-scanning equipment that prints out paper records of a voter's choices.

Crist made the announcement Thursday at a meeting of the Voters Coalition in Delray Beach, Fla., along with US Representative Robert Wexler(Democrat, Florida) (Obama's Florida campaign chairman), and other officials. The initiative had been confirmed Wednesday by a Wexler aide.

"Through this proposal, every Floridian will be able to go to the polls with total confidence that their vote will be counted on Election Day," Wexler said in a statement. "Thanks to the leadership of Governor Crist, Florida now leads the way in election integrity -- with the guarantee of a paper trail for all votes cast."

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/020107-florida-governor-opts-for-e-voting.html


May 21, 2007 - Governor Crist signs House Bill 537 that will establish a paper trail for all votes cast in Florida. The election-reform legislation will provide optical scan machines for counties that do not already have them for Election Day voting and early voting sites. The legislation also changes the date of Florida’s presidential primary to the last Tuesday in January.

http://governor.myflorida.com/release/9011
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2230&Itemid=113

And the people of Florida will pay
And the tax payers of Florida will pay the millions of dollars necessary to convert from the old touch screen machines
http://www.nbc-2.com/articles/readarticle.asp?articleid=12420&z=3


All Democratic voters ,regardless of their preferred candidate, should be outraged that Florida’s 1.7 million voters voices are silenced over this, and that their delegates will not be seated at the Democratic convention because of this.

All Republicans voters are laughing their heads off.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Democrats in the FL legislature could have avoided this....
by simply voting against it.

Rules are rules!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly. . .1.7 million voices were awfully silent
when they knew their primary wasn't going to count before the voting. And how many of them chose to stay home since they weren't going to vote in the presidential contest? Why is it that the Clinton campaign has no problem disenfranchising them for choosing to avoid the primary in protest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
4.  she didn't care about the "1.7 million voices"...
until she needed them.

She doesn't care about anything that doesn't work to her advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Not true. Hillary said long before January 29th should would work to get the delegates seated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. After she signed the pledge that they would NOT count.
Typical Hillary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Wrong. That's not on the pledge she signed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. Link? Are you familiar with the quote in my sig? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. You're quote is about Michigan. This thread is about Florida.
Freakin go away if you cannot stick to the subject of the thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #31
47. So we agree that she is lying about Michigan?
Guess what, I am not going away. Clinton lies about MI (I was against MI before I was for them) is totally related to her lies about Florida.

Please provide I link with her thoughts about Florida prior to the primaries starting. Alas, you know that she didn't give a shit about either state until she realized it was in her own best political interest, but I want to the hilarity you come up with.

Hillary/Baghdad Bob 08!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Please feel free to start your own thread if you wish to discuss Michigan.
Otherwise stick to the subject of this one.

DU rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #48
55. Hillary lies about FL and she lies about MI
Don't you think the two are related enough to discuss in the same thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
38. FL and MI will be seated
They've already scheduled a date to seat them (5/31). Obama is just playing with Hillary right now. Hillary is like a dog that's chewing up your sofa cushions, so Obama tossed her the FL & MI bones. Her campaign is now forced to split their time and energy between seating FL and MI as well as other things. Great strategy by the Obama campaign. Hillary actually took the time to write a letter to Obama about it and it's part of her stump speech too. Every second she spends focused on FL and MI is a second she can't focus on other things in her campaign. And everybody knows that her campaign is hardly well-run to begin with, so throwing FL and MI into it just clogs up more gears in her campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. We are discussing 1.7 million Democrats - some voted for Obama
If you could please resist the obvious compulsion to inject Hillary hate into all things Florida - - you might realize that 1.7 million Floridians do not have the Mccaskill cheerleading concept in mind. Not hardly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #45
57. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #45
69. What happened to the other millions..
of registered Democrats?

Posted: August 27, 2007, 6:05 PM ET
DNC Moves to Stop Primary Frontloading
The Democratic National Committee moved over the weekend to penalize Florida for moving up its primary date to Jan. 29 -- a violation of DNC rules that prohibit states from holding nominating polls before Feb. 5. The committee said the Sunshine State would be stripped of its delegation at the party's National Convention in 2008 if the state does not reschedule its primary in the next 30 days.

As the nation's fourth-most-populous state, Florida has 210 delegates and has played a major role in recent presidential elections. Florida's decision to advance its primary follows the increasing trend of states pushing up their contests in order to gain relevance in the election.
"Rules are rules. California abided by them, and Florida should, as well. To ignore them would open the door to chaos," said Garry Shays, a DNC member from California. California -- with its 441 delegates -- moved its primary to Feb. 5, along with more than a dozen other states.
-----------------------------------------

The DNC gave Florida the option of holding a Jan. 29 contest but with nonbinding results, and the delegates would be awarded at a later official date.


Florida Democratic Committee Chairwoman Karen Thurman said this option would be expensive -- as much as $8 million -- and potentially undoable. Another option would be to challenge the ruling in court.

"We do represent, standing here, a lot of Democrats in the state of Florida -- over 4 million,"
Thurman said, according to the New York Times. "This is emotional for Florida. And it should be."
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/politics/july-dec07/florida_08-27.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
67. Not how I remember it....


Editorial: Follow DNC rules on seating delegates
February 25, 2008
By Editorial Board

On September 1, the campaigns of Clinton and Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.) issued press releases stating that they had signed pledges affirming the DNC’s decision to approve certain representative states and sanction others for moving their nominating contests earlier. But now that the race is close, Clinton — whose top advisor Harold Ickes voted as a member of the DNC to strip Florida and Michigan of their delegates — is pushing for the delegates to be seated.
Her argument is that not doing so disenfranchises the 1.7 million Florida Democrats who voted and that her pledge promised only that she wouldn’t campaign in the states, not that she wouldn’t try to seat the delegates. However, the results of the contests in Florida and Michigan are not necessarily representative of the voters’ preferences in those states. Given that most of the candidates removed their names from the
Michigan ballot, and that many voters stayed home from the vote in Florida with the understanding that their contest would not affect the final delegate count, the delegate totals that the candidates accumulated in these states may not accurately reflect the will of the voters. Had there been no restrictions in Michigan and Florida, the turnout, and thus the results, may have been different.

The Four State Pledge all candidates signed on Aug. 28 stated, “Whereas, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee will strip states of 100% of their delegates and super delegates to the DNC National Convention if they violate the nomination calendar...


Therefore, I ____________, Democratic Candidate for President, in honor and in accordance with DNC rules ...pledge I shall not campaign or participate in any election contest occurring in any state not already authorized by the DNC to take place in the DNC approved pre-window.” When the candidates pledged to campaign only in approved states, they were also agreeing to the terms listed above, which explicitly mentioned stripping noncompliant states of their entire delegation.


http://daily.stanford.edu/article/2008/2/25/editorialFollowDncRulesOnSeatingDelegates



Democrats vow to skip defiant states

By Mark Z. Barabak, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
September 2, 2007
The muddled 2008 presidential nomination calendar gained some clarity Saturday -- at least on the Democratic side -- as the party's major candidates agreed not to campaign in any state that defies party rules by voting earlier than allowed.

Their collective action was a blow to Florida and Michigan, two states likely to be important in the general election, which sought to enhance their clout in the nominating process as well.
Front-runner Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York followed Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina in pledging to abide by the calendar set by the
Democratic National Committee last summer. The rules allow four states -- Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina -- to vote in January.The four "need to be first because in these states ideas count, not just money," Edwards said in a written statement. "This tried-and-true nominating system is the only way for voters to judge the field based on the quality of the candidate, not the depth of their war chest."

Hours later, after Obama took the pledge, Clinton's campaign chief issued a statement citing the four states' "unique and special role in the nominating process" and said that the New York senator, too, would "adhere to the DNC-approved calendar."


Three candidates running farther back in the pack -- New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and Sens. Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut and Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware -- said Friday they would honor the pledge, shortly after the challenge was issued in a letter co-signed by Democratic leaders in the four early states.





Michigan defies parties, moves up primary date
JAN. 15 DECISION COULD SET OFF STAMPEDE OF STATES

By Stephen Ohlemacher
Associated Press
Article Launched: 09/05/2007 01:34:57 AM PDT

WASHINGTON - Michigan officially crashed the early primary party Tuesday, setting up showdowns with both political parties and likely pushing the presidential nomination calendar closer to 2007.

Gov. Jennifer Granholm signed a bill moving both of Michigan's presidential primaries to Jan. 15. Michigan's move threatens to set off a chain reaction that could force Iowa and New Hampshire to reschedule their contests even earlier than anticipated, perhaps in the first week in January 2008 or even December 2007.
-------------------------------------------
The national parties have tried to impose discipline on the rogue states. On the Republican side, states that schedule contests before Feb. 5 risk losing half their delegates to next summer's convention, though some are banking that whoever wins the GOP nomination will eventually restore the delegates.
Democrats have experienced similar problems, but party officials hoped they had stopped the mad dash to move up by threatening to strip Florida of all its convention delegates for scheduling a primary Jan. 29 and by persuading the major Democratic candidates to campaign only in the party-approved early states.

The decision by the major Democratic candidates to campaign only in approved early states renders voting in the rogue states essentially non-binding beauty contests.

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_6804685?source=rss


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #67
74. No they were not agreeing with the stripping. They were pledging to not campaign. Period.

In December of 2007 Senator Carl Levin, D-Mich., said in a statement: “The threat not to seat the delegates of Michigan and Florida at the Democratic convention is a hollow threat. They will be seated, and when they are, it will be plain for all to see that the privileged position that New Hampshire and Iowa have extracted through threats and pledges from candidates is on its last legs.”

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/shared/news/DNC02_PBP.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #74
82. What does Carl Levin's
perception of whether the sanctions voted on by the Democratic National Committee would be carried out, have to do with Hillary Clinton's agreement to abide by the Democratic Party Rules? Harold Ickes voted to strip Florida and Michigan's delegates for God's sake. How many articles need to be posted for you to admit the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #82
86. They were not agreeing with the stripping. Most democrats felt as Levin did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #86
88. You are just lying..
Carl Levin did not want the sanctions carried out. Period.

Florida Dems defy Dean on primary date
By Sam Youngman
Posted: 06/12/07 07:58 PM
Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), is trapped in a high-stakes game of chicken with party leaders in Florida.
They warned him yesterday not to “disenfranchise” state voters and risk being blamed for a debacle on the scale of the 2000 recount.

The warning comes amid alarm over a decision Sunday by state Democratic leaders to embrace Jan. 29 as the primary date. They are defying DNC headquarters and daring it to follow through on its threat to disqualify electors selected in the primary and punish candidates who campaign there.

But the DNC is not backing down. The committee bought time with a statement late yesterday saying, “The DNC will enforce the rules as passed by its 447 members in Aug. 2006. Until the Florida State Democratic Party formally submits its plan and we’ve had the opportunity to review that submission, we will not speculate further.”

Dean does not, in any case, have the power to waive party rules, a DNC spokeswoman said.
The entire committee would have to vote again to do that.

------------------
Carol Fowler, chairwoman of the South Carolina Democratic Party, said she won’t move that state’s primary, scheduled for Feb. 2, unless the national committee allows her. “I’m going to do what the DNC tells me to,” Fowler said. “I’m not willing to violate the rules. The penalties are too stiff.”


http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/florida-dems-defy-dean-on-primary-date-2007-06-12.html


Posted: August 27, 2007, 6:05 PM ET
DNC Moves to Stop Primary Frontloading
The Democratic National Committee moved over the weekend to penalize Florida for moving up its primary date to Jan. 29 -- a violation of DNC rules that prohibit states from holding nominating polls before Feb. 5. The committee said the Sunshine State would be stripped of its delegation at the party's National Convention in 2008 if the state does not reschedule its primary in the next 30 days.

As the nation's fourth-most-populous state, Florida has 210 delegates and has played a major role in recent presidential elections. Florida's decision to advance its primary follows the increasing trend of states pushing up their contests in order to gain relevance in the election.
"Rules are rules. California abided by them, and Florida should, as well. To ignore them would open the door to chaos," said Garry Shays, a DNC member from California. California -- with its 441 delegates -- moved its primary to Feb. 5, along with more than a dozen other states.
-----------------------------------------

The DNC gave Florida the option of holding a Jan. 29 contest but with nonbinding results, and the delegates would be awarded at a later official date.


Florida Democratic Committee Chairwoman Karen Thurman said this option would be expensive -- as much as $8 million -- and potentially undoable. Another option would be to challenge the ruling in court.

"We do represent, standing here, a lot of Democrats in the state of Florida -- over 4 million," Thurman said, according to the New York Times. "This is emotional for Florida. And it should be."
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/politics/july-dec07/florida_08-27.html




Lawmakers in US state Michigan approve moving presidential primary to January despite rules
The Associated Press
Published: August 30, 2007

LANSING, Michigan: Michigan lawmakers have approved moving the state's U.S. presidential nomination contests to January, three weeks earlier than party rules allow, as states continue to challenge the traditional primary election calendar to gain influence in the race.

Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm is expected to sign the bill passed Thursday that would move the contest to Jan. 15, but approval of the switch is far from certain. A disagreement among state Democratic leaders over whether to hold a traditional ballot vote or a more restricted caucus is complicating final action.

If the date moves up, Michigan Democrats risk losing all their national convention delegates,
while Republicans risk losing half.
------------------------------------
"We understand that we're violating the rules, but it wasn't by choice," Michigan Republican Chairman Saul Anuzis said, noting that state Democrats first proposed moving the date to Jan. 15.
"We're going to ask for forgiveness and we think ... we will get forgiveness."
----------------------------------
Florida Democrats decided to move their state's primary to Jan. 29. The national party has said it will strip Florida of its presidential convention delegates unless it decides within the next few weeks to move the vote to a later date.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/08/31/america/NA-POL-US-Primary-Scramble.php?WT.mc_id=rssap_america



Published: Monday, September 24, 2007
Florida defies Dems, moves up primary
Associated Press
PEMBROKE PINES, Fla. — The Florida Democratic Party is sticking to its primary date — and it printed bumper stickers to prove it.
State party leaders formally announced Sunday their plans to move ahead with a Jan. 29 primary, despite the national leadership's threatened sanctions.
The Democratic National Committee has said it will strip the Sunshine State of its 210 nominating convention delegates if it doesn't abide by the party-set calendar, which forbids most states from holding primary contests before Feb. 5.
The exceptions are Iowa on Jan. 14, Nevada on Jan. 19, New Hampshire on Jan. 22 and South Carolina on Jan. 29.
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20070924/NEWS02/709240045/-1/



Democrats vow to skip defiant states
Six candidates agree not to campaign in those that break with the party's calendar. Florida and Michigan, this includes you.
By Mark Z. Barabak, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
September 2, 2007
The muddled 2008 presidential nomination calendar gained some clarity Saturday -- at least on the Democratic side -- as the party's major candidates agreed not to campaign in any state that defies party rules by voting earlier than allowed.

Their collective action was a blow to Florida and Michigan, two states likely to be important in the general election, which sought to enhance their clout in the nominating process as well.
Front-runner Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York followed Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina in pledging to abide by the calendar set by the
Democratic National Committee last summer.
The rules allow four states -- Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina -- to vote in January.
The four "need to be first because in these states ideas count, not just money," Edwards said in a written statement. "This tried-and-true nominating system is the only way for voters to judge the field based on the quality of the candidate, not the depth of their war chest."

Hours later, after Obama took the pledge, Clinton's campaign chief issued a statement citing the four states' "unique and special role in the nominating process" and said that the New York senator, too, would "adhere to the DNC-approved calendar."


Three candidates running farther back in the pack -- New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and Sens. Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut and Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware -- said Friday they would honor the pledge, shortly after the challenge was issued in a letter co-signed by Democratic leaders in the four early states.
--
Florida, the state that proved pivotal in the 2000 presidential election, is again a source of much upheaval. Ignoring the rule that put January off-limits, legislators moved the state's primary up to Jan. 29, pushing Florida past California and other big states voting Feb. 5.Leaders of the national party responded last month by giving Florida 30 days to reconsider, or have its delegates barred from the August convention in Denver.

"The party had to send a strong message to Florida and the other states," said Donna Brazile, a veteran campaign strategist and member of the Democratic National Committee, the party's governing body. "We have a system that is totally out of control."

Despite that warning, Michigan lawmakers moved last week to jump the queue, voting to advance the state's primary to Jan. 15.



Michigan defies parties, moves up primary date
JAN. 15 DECISION COULD SET OFF STAMPEDE OF STATES

By Stephen Ohlemacher
Associated Press
Article Launched: 09/05/2007 01:34:57 AM PDT

WASHINGTON - Michigan officially crashed the early primary party Tuesday, setting up showdowns with both political parties and likely pushing the presidential nomination calendar closer to 2007.


Gov. Jennifer Granholm signed a bill moving both of Michigan's presidential primaries to Jan. 15. Michigan's move threatens to set off a chain reaction that could force Iowa and New Hampshire to reschedule their contests even earlier than anticipated, perhaps in the first week in January 2008 or even December 2007.
-------------------------------------------
The national parties have tried to impose discipline on the rogue states. On the Republican side, states that schedule contests before Feb. 5 risk losing half their delegates to next summer's convention, though some are banking that whoever wins the GOP nomination will eventually restore the delegates.
Democrats have experienced similar problems, but party officials hoped they had stopped the mad dash to move up by threatening to strip Florida of all its convention delegates for scheduling a primary Jan. 29 and by persuading the major Democratic candidates to campaign only in the party-approved early states.

The decision by the major Democratic candidates to campaign only in approved early states renders voting in the rogue states essentially non-binding beauty contests.

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_6804685?source=rss


Kucinich Files Affidavit To Remove Name From Michigan's Primary Shortly Before Deadline

October 10, 2007 8:19 a.m. EST
Ayinde O. Chase - AHN Staff
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7008781843
Dover, NH (AHN) - The Kucinich for President campaign Tuesday afternoon officially requested that Kucinich's name be withdrawn from the Michigan Democratic primary ballot. The affidavit came by way of to the Michigan Secretary of State's office.The Ohio Congressman and Democratic Presidential candidates
National Campaign manager Mike Klein said in the statement, "We signed a public pledge recently, promising to stand with New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina, and the DNC-approved 'early window', and the action we are taking today protects New Hampshire's first-in-the-nation primary status, and Nevada's early caucus."
The statement continued: "We support the grassroots nature of the New Hampshire, small-state primary, and we support the diversity efforts that Chairman Dean and the DNC instituted last year, when they added Nevada and South Carolina to the window in January 2008. We are obviously committed to New Hampshire's
historic role." Klein who actually recently moved to Dover said, "We will continue to adhere to the DNC-approved primary schedule."

Governor Granholm and other Michigan Democratic leaders have openly criticized the decision by several presidential candidates to keep their names off the state primary ballot. The Michigan lawmakers are taken back by Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John Edwards and Bill Richardson's decision to withdraw their names from the January 15th ballot.

The only ones who remain on Michigan's primary ballot are Hillary Clinton, Mike Gravel and Chris Todd.



December 1, 2007,
11:42 am
Democrats Strip Michigan of Delegates
By The New York Times

In a widely expected move, the Democratic National Committee voted this morning to strip Michigan of all its 156 delegates to the national nominating convention next year. The state is the party’s rules by holding its primary on Jan. 15. Only Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada are allowed to hold contests prior to Feb. 5.
The party imposed a similar penalty on Florida in August for scheduling a Jan. 29 primary.
The Democratic candidates have already pledged not to campaign in the state, and Senators Barack Obama and Joseph R. Biden Jr., as well as John Edwards and Gov. Bill Richardson, asked to have their names removed from the state ballot.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/democrats-strip-michigan-delegates/



Editorial: Follow DNC rules on seating delegates
February 25, 2008
By Editorial Board

On September 1, the campaigns of Clinton and Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.) issued press releases stating that they had signed pledges affirming the DNC’s decision to approve certain representative states and sanction others for moving their nominating contests earlier. But now that the race is close, Clinton — whose top advisor Harold Ickes voted as a member of the DNC to strip Florida and Michigan of their delegates — is pushing for the delegates to be seated.

Her argument is that not doing so disenfranchises the 1.7 million Florida Democrats who voted and that her pledge promised only that she wouldn’t campaign in the states, not that she wouldn’t try to seat the delegates. However, the results of the contests in Florida and Michigan are not necessarily representative of the voters’ preferences in those states. Given that most of the candidates removed their names from the
Michigan ballot, and that many voters stayed home from the vote in Florida with the understanding that their contest would not affect the final delegate count, the delegate totals that the candidates accumulated in these states may not accurately reflect the will of the voters. Had there been no restrictions in Michigan and Florida, the turnout, and thus the results, may have been different.

The Four State Pledge all candidates signed on Aug. 28 stated, “Whereas, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee will strip states of 100% of their delegates and super delegates to the DNC National Convention if they violate the nomination calendar...


Therefore, I ____________, Democratic Candidate for President, in honor and in accordance with DNC rules ...pledge I shall not campaign or participate in any election contest occurring in any state not already authorized by the DNC to take place in the DNC approved pre-window.” When the candidates pledged to campaign only in approved states, they were also agreeing to the terms listed above, which explicitly mentioned stripping noncompliant states of their entire delegation.



House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) recently said that the Florida and Michigan delegates should not be seated if they would decide the nomination. Other compromise proposals include holding new nominating contests in these states, but such contests would be expensive and cumbersome. The irony is that had Florida and Michigan not moved up their primaries, they would have voted in February and March, when they would have been even more important than in earlier months in determining the Democratic nominee — and would not have created an enormous controversy that has the potential to divide the party.
http://daily.stanford.edu/article/2008/2/25/editorialFollowDncRulesOnSeatingDelegates


Potential presidential nominees who did not want to appear on the Michigan January 15, 2008 presidential primary ballot could submit an affidavit with the Secretary of State by 4:00 p.m. on October 9, 2007. The January 15 date violates DNC rules, and five Democrats did submit the required affidavit: Biden, Edwards, Kucinich, Obama and Richardson. Clinton, Dodd and Gravel will appear on the Democratic ballot.

http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2008/chrnothp08/mi100907pr.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. That's not true. There was a wide-spread capaign to tell each voter their votes would count.
It's hard for me to believe that Hillary haters still try to push on this lie. It is truly disgraceful, this Democratic hate against 1.7 million Democrats in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
58. Hillary can't win even with FL and MI
didn't you get that TPS report? It's all about convincing the supers that Obama can't win because he's black now. I know that the goalposts keep changing, by do try to keep up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
84. Wide Spread Campaign?
When? After the election? Could you please provide any literature that backs up that claim? I'm sorry the facts do not sit well with "Hillary Lovers". It is truly disgraceful that "Democrats" advocate dissolving the "Democratic National Party", and it's rules. The "Democratic Party" is not the party of "Hillary Clinton, Michigan, and Florida".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The Democrats in Florida would have slashed their political throats if they voted against HB537
The Paper Trail was of utmost priority. And this important fact is 35,000 feet over the heads of Obama supporters such as Donna Brazile, who could truly care less about Floridains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. The were told by the DNC....
Vote against it, your delegates get seated.

They knew the score before the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. The DNC slashed 100% of delegates in August - - three months after the bill was signed into law.
Please - get your story straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Hillary signed that pledge in AUGUST.
Get yours straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Listen you. Go get a copy of the pledge - and show us all where it says what you claim.
That should be quite simple if what you're screaming was in fact true, shouldn't it??????

Well, let's see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Perhaps sometimes you need to make a sacrifice for the greater good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah, like the "1.7 million voices"...
funny they didn't matter before the fuck up by the FL legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Your story is confused. The DNC slashed 100% three months after the bill became law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Hillary signed the pledge...
she knew they wouldn't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Get a copy of the pledge and stop this spamming.
Trashing my thread will never make what you say accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. I was referring to your FL politicos who were afraid to take a stand
Edited on Fri May-09-08 07:12 AM by Skidmore
for their people against the Rs. Political suicide sometimes is a worthy thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Wrong. The Forida Democrats all wanted the paper trail.
Edited on Fri May-09-08 07:17 AM by Maribelle
Try focusing.

Most Floridians had no idea Wexler would betray them

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Your argument is complete bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. No yours is. Mine is thoroughly corroborated by the facts.
Edited on Fri May-09-08 07:59 AM by Maribelle
Yours appears to be looking through brown drippings, the source of which has been often told on this very board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. This is truly scary, isn't it?
McCain is leading Obama in Florida by significant numbers - - many say a direct result of Obama silencing the voices of 1.7 million Democrats and Wexler going along with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #28
36. McCain and Obama are tied...
...in our household. It's zero-to-zero and looks likely to stay that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. ha ha ha My household appears to be leading to a 50/50 split.

One will vote for McCain if Hillary is not the nominee.

One will write in Hillary's name.

Things could change, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
92. You got neocon scumbags at your house? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. The dems had the choice, they were in control of the motion and the republicans asked
Edited on Fri May-09-08 07:23 AM by Boz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Wrong again. Every single Democrat in Florida with half a brain knew the motion would fail.
Edited on Fri May-09-08 07:34 AM by Maribelle
Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. LOL! Yeah, keep telling yourself that.
Maybe it will make the disenfranchisement of 1.75 million Florida Dems seem like the RIGHT thing to do somehow. Good luck with that.

Buy yourself some good champagne for McCain's Inauguration. You've earned it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
91. ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. What is outrageous is that the Republicans duped the Dems into
violating DNC rules in order to comply with state legislation. What is outrageous is that Wexler who was right there is guilty of allowing this to happen without putting up a fight or without recognizing the damage about to be inflicted upon the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #29
39. And when Wexler stood their with Crist the bill HB 537 was already introduced.

Perhaps Wexler was already supporting Obama that day when he stood close to Crist for the photo op - - a bill that lead to the slashing of 1.7 million Democratic voices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
50. They would have been outvoted
Republicans have a little bit less than a 2-1 advantage in each chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:03 AM
Original message
What is outrageous is that the state of florida
thought that they could violate the rules with impunity and that you would attempt to spin it into someting that it is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
22. I would spin? Please. Your personal attack will not make what you say true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. Your whole argument goes out the window with the smoking gun.
The DNC members had handouts that included quotes by House Minority leader Dan Gelber brushing off Howard Dean, and the following transcript of Steve Geller making the motion to move the primary to Feb. 5:

Geller: "...So the Democratic leader and the Democratic leader pro tem are jointly making this motion, which we will duly show them later, that we tried not to have the election on, um, before (Feb. 5).
President: "And so Sen. Geller are you urging a negative vote or would you like us to pass this vote?"
Geller: "Oh no sir. We really, really want this. Don't we senator? (sarcasm and audible laughter in chamber).


The republicans asked them how they wanted them to vote, since it wasn't their parties issue, and the pompous Democrat Steve Gellar sealed the fate, because he wanted to be more relevant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. There you go. 1.7 million Democrats' voices slashed because of subjective interpretation of one.
Thanks for posting this argument. It merely shows off the deplorable political blunder of the DNC over the interpretation of ONE Democratic. That's right - - punish 1.7 million because of this.

I cannot thank you enough for posting this hate. You prove the case for millions of Floridians against the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. Sorry to disappoint you it was a coordinated effort of their representation
They are responsible for putting them in the position, they accept the consequences, thats how a republic works.

Your hate is self loathing. YOU ARE TO BLAME FOR THE LOSS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. The motion, the video, the proof it was their choice
Edited on Fri May-09-08 07:29 AM by Boz
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x108575

As to proving a republic is representatives chosen by voters, I think you can handle that yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. Wrong. That does not prove a coordinated effort. Follow your own posts please.
You said - coordinated effort.

Prove it. I've had enough of your deceptive tricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. The video shows 15 florida reps, thats a group coordinating a choice
Edited on Fri May-09-08 07:42 AM by Boz
Ive had enough of your double speak, up is down, truth is deceptive.

Good luck with your denial, failure and freep conversion.

See ya on the other side of the purge.

If you survive, I doubt it. Cornfed dont mean brainfood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. #1 you try clicking on the link #2 it is subjective interpretation #3 ...
Edited on Fri May-09-08 07:53 AM by Maribelle
I asked for proof - - proof of this 'coordinated effort' you spit out.


not more subjective interpreting




And what on earth is this childish pomp all about : 'See ya on the other side of the purge. If you survive'. If you think you can intimidate me by your poop - - you're even younger than I thought.


Then again - some people never grow up, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. Oh. Kay.
???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riskpeace Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
43. This Floridian thanks you for this post.
I think this is such an important part of this situation and one that has been consistently downplayed by some.

You are right the RNC and the Republican Party of Florida are most likely very pleased with the DNC's over-reaction.

I've wondered whether the DNC had other motives to take all the delegates. Compare the importance of the Republican primary, where the RNC took 1/2 the delegates and McCain gained crucial pre-Super Tuesday momentum, to the Democratic primary with its 1.7 million Democratic voters, which the media ignored and Hillary won 50-33 over Obama.

We've heard a lot about the demographics of a state this campaign season. Florida certainly more closely mirrors a demographic favorable to Senator Clinton (and so does Michigan). I've wondered whether some in the DNC may have acted out of a partisan desire to freeze the contest and exclude two states clearly favorable to Senator Clinton.

We've also heard "the math" for a number of months now. Of course, "the math" excluded two of the largest eight states in the union; so much for that "50 State Strategy."

I've talked to a number of registered Democratic voters who are frustrated that our votes are being ignored by our own party. That emotion will be an obstacle for Senator Obama in the fall election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. Many Democrats were watching the night of Jan 29th when McCain received 701,761 votes.

We watched the huge republican celebration on all news networks, which clearly was the beginning of McCain's massive momentum.

But Hillary received 870,986 votes. She received the most votes of any candidate - Republican and Democratic. MSNBC did not even report the Democratic numbers when reporting election results. All other stations reported that the votes would not count.

But the votes were counted - certified by the Secretary of the State of Florida, and recorded in the history books - showing Hillary's record shattering victory.

It makes no sense. The DNC, Donna Brazile, Howard Dean, all of them should be ashamed for what they've done to Democrats in Florida. They've not only insulted the voices of 1.7 million Democrats, they killed the Democratic momentum in Florida both today and perhaps for at least a decade.

Just witness how the RNC punished Florida by keeping with their 50% rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
49. Great Post....
Thanks for posting, Maribelle. I'm hoping that this nightmare is resolved in a way that gives Hillary the votes she earned, because if it's not, the consequence in November will be grave. All these Obama supporters that praise Dean for his enforcement of DNC "Rules", will be feeling very foolish in Nov.


Thanks again.

Go Hillary!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
51. You lost, Maribelle.
Be big enough to admit it.

Rasmussen has ended daily tracking between the two candidates.

Hillary's flinging racist code speech left and right.

It's over. She's toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. I lost? I lost what? We're talking about 1.7 million Floridians being betrayed.
That's not a loss. That's tragic.

Please just go away if all you want to do is bash me and not discuss the subject of the tread. You're breaking DU rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Are you, like, standing in the median strip of your local expressway and
shrieking out about how Hillary was screwed in Florida and Michigan?

Really?

The Chairman of our party disagrees with you, Maribelle.

So do I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #54
59. This thread is about the Paper Trail which lead to 1.7 million Floridans losing their voices.
Some of these voters chose Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. I got the story when it happened. You lost.
Dean is right. You are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. I've posted facts. You've posted continued personal attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #62
64. It's your view that Dean is wrong, evidently.
Edited on Fri May-09-08 09:21 AM by Old Crusoe
The fact is, quite a few of us support him.

I certainly liked him in 04 but I like him even better now, and he's had this one right from the start.

Which means your OP -- by no means the first of its kind -- is essentially spam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #64
68. This morning's news in South West Florida talks about the Paper Trail issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #68
73. This morning's op-ed piece in the New York TIMES calls Sen. Clinton to
task for the shit campaign she's running.

It uses more polite adjectives than the one I used, but we're on the same page.

Again, your petulant defiance of Howard Dean is untoward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #73
77. This thread is not about HIllary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #77
97. We're laughing long and hard at that one, Maribelle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondbostonian Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #59
72. You have no idea about Florida
I live and work here. The only people who feel like they are losing their voices are a few hundred people being used as puppets at those events organized by wealthy Clinton supporters.

I went to the event in Broward County. It was laughable.

There's no outrage here. I expect you to be banned in about three weeks and I'm counting the minutes :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #72
75. I have no idea about Florida? You couldn't be further from the truth.

And your attempted intimidation: "I expect you to be banned in about three weeks and I'm counting the minutes" does not work for a second.

Go away with your hate mongering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondbostonian Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #75
79. You're the one not voting for Obama in the GE
Once this nomination is settled, there will be no bashing of Obama allowed. I doubt you will be able to get past those rules.

You don't live in florida. Have you been to any of the events here? Have you talked to the supporters on the ground attending these events? I have. I'm more informed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. I most certainly do live in Florida.
Go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
52. If the Dems had stood together
opposed the bill and explained it to the voters, they would have a case to make. They thought they could wink wink their way through this, spit in Howard Dean's face, and get on the good side of the next President. Well too bad, it blew up in their face. They'll have to wait for Hillary to concede her delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. Florida Dems could also have held a CAUCUS on ANY DATE.
They were not bound to have a primary that
broke the rules.

Total crappage.

And for the OP to portray the legislation as
the will of one (1) bad democrat!

The vote was 115 to 1 with HIM!

Trashing Wexler is the final straw.

He is Florida's shining light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #52
61. Your opinion is merely subjective, not based on the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #61
66. Fact, they all voted yes, save one
Fact, they knew the consequences when they did it.

Fact, Hillary knew there was no campaign in Florida and the entire basis of democracy is the ability of the voter to know the nominees through a campaign.

Fact, Hllary claimed a phony victory anyway.

Fact, Florida will be seated when the loser concedes their delegates, when all delegates will rally behind the winner, the way it always works. Nobody will be disenfranchised.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #66
76. The consequences when they voted on the bill was based on the DNC rule that stated 50%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #76
81. No, that's the automatic portion
The rules don't say there isn't any other consequence possible. Florida was given a chance to fix this problem and they just refused because the Florida Dems are trying to throw it to Hillary.

"Under the DNC delegate selection rules, if a state party’s plan violates the rule with
respect to timing, the number of its pledged delegates—those delegates awarded proportionally
to candidates based on the primary or caucus results—is automatically reduced 50% (without
any action by the RBC or DNC); no member of the DNC can attend the Convention as a
delegate; no Member of Congress can attend the Convention as a delegate; and if applicable, the
state’s Democratic governor can not attend the Convention as a delegate. In addition, any
presidential candidate who campaigns in the state for the event in violation of the rules cannot
receive any pledged delegates from that state. In addition to these automatic sanctions, the DNC
RBC has authority under the rules to impose additional sanctions, including further reductions in
the state’s delegation.

At its meeting on August 25, 2007, the DNC RBC found Florida’s plan in noncompliance
with the DNC rules, and voted to increase the sanctions against Florida by reducing
the state’s delegation by 100% unless the state party, within the 30-day period allowed by the
Committee’s regulations, submitted a plan for an alternative, state party-run process on or after
February 5 that would be used to allocate delegate positions."

http://spa.american.edu/ccps/getpdf.php?table=publications&ID=67
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #81
85. You said 'they knew the consequences when they did it'. No one did.
The bill was signed into law by Crist in May of 2007. The 100% was not created until August of 2007 - - almost exactly three months later.

No one knew in May of 2007 that in August of 2007 the DNC would slash Florida of 100% of her delegates.

Attempting to imply otherwise is merely attempting to impose total fallacy on the debate. Both Republicans and Democrats truly believed they would be punished by 50%.

The Republicans belief came to fruition.

The Democrats had the rug pulled out from under them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #85
89. It's in the rules
"Nothing in the preceding subsections of this rule shall be construed to prevent the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee from imposing additional sanctions,

"...the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee may determine that all or a portion of the state’s delegation shall not be reduced."

What is it about the word "all" that isn't clear.

http://a9.g.akamai.net/7/9/8082/v001/democratic1.download.akamai.com/8082/pdfs/2008delegateselectionrules.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #89
90. 'acted in good faith' - It appears you agree with Donna Brazile that laughing is proof
that elected officials were not acting in good faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #90
93. Voting no
would be acting in good faith. Scheduling a caucus would be acting in good faith. They weren't acting in good faith. This was a power play and the DLC lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #85
95. The problem with your argument..
is that Florida knew in August of 2007, exactly what the consequences would be and chose not to pursue any type of reconciliation with the "Democratic Party".

Florida Dems defy Dean on primary date
By Sam Youngman
Posted: 06/12/07 07:58 PM
Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), is trapped in a high-stakes game of chicken with party leaders in Florida.
They warned him yesterday not to “disenfranchise” state voters and risk being blamed for a debacle on the scale of the 2000 recount.

The warning comes amid alarm over a decision Sunday by state Democratic leaders to embrace Jan. 29 as the primary date. They are defying DNC headquarters and daring it to follow through on its threat to disqualify electors selected in the primary and punish candidates who campaign there.

But the DNC is not backing down. The committee bought time with a statement late yesterday saying, “The DNC will enforce the rules as passed by its 447 members in Aug. 2006. Until the Florida State Democratic Party formally submits its plan and we’ve had the opportunity to review that submission, we will not speculate further.”

Dean does not, in any case, have the power to waive party rules, a DNC spokeswoman said.
The entire committee would have to vote again to do that.

------------------
Carol Fowler, chairwoman of the South Carolina Democratic Party, said she won’t move that state’s primary, scheduled for Feb. 2, unless the national committee allows her. “I’m going to do what the DNC tells me to,” Fowler said. “I’m not willing to violate the rules. The penalties are too stiff.”


http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/florida-dems-defy-dean-on-primary-date-2007-06-12.html


Posted: August 27, 2007, 6:05 PM ET
DNC Moves to Stop Primary Frontloading
The Democratic National Committee moved over the weekend to penalize Florida for moving up its primary date to Jan. 29 -- a violation of DNC rules that prohibit states from holding nominating polls before Feb. 5. The committee said the Sunshine State would be stripped of its delegation at the party's National Convention in 2008 if the state does not reschedule its primary in the next 30 days.

As the nation's fourth-most-populous state, Florida has 210 delegates and has played a major role in recent presidential elections. Florida's decision to advance its primary follows the increasing trend of states pushing up their contests in order to gain relevance in the election.
"Rules are rules. California abided by them, and Florida should, as well. To ignore them would open the door to chaos," said Garry Shays, a DNC member from California. California -- with its 441 delegates -- moved its primary to Feb. 5, along with more than a dozen other states.
-----------------------------------------

The DNC gave Florida the option of holding a Jan. 29 contest but with nonbinding results, and the delegates would be awarded at a later official date.


Florida Democratic Committee Chairwoman Karen Thurman said this option would be expensive -- as much as $8 million -- and potentially undoable. Another option would be to challenge the ruling in court.

"We do represent, standing here, a lot of Democrats in the state of Florida -- over 4 million," Thurman said, according to the New York Times. "This is emotional for Florida. And it should be."
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/politics/july-dec07/florida_08-27.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
63. While I agree it was a bad move to exclude FL & MI Democrats
from the primary voting process, changing the rules now would be equally bad and unfair. It is patently unfair to the candidates that did not campaign in those states (with the understanding that their delegations would not be allowed to vote at the convention) to now just take those primary results as if all was normal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #63
71. My personal opinion is that it might be too late for the DNC to try to heal 1.7 million Floridians.
I believe we are now between a rock and a hard place. Republicans in Florida are purposely making a laughing stock out of Democrats. All Democrats - - even those that voted for Obama, but especially those that voted for Obama - - which in the districts where Obama won also reported record turnouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
65. this morning's NYTimes Op-Ed page, the same one that endorsed Clinton
But we believe just as strongly that Mrs. Clinton will be making a terrible mistake — for herself, her party and for the nation — if she continues to press her candidacy through negative campaigning with disturbing racial undertones. We believe it would also be a terrible mistake if she launches a fight over the disqualified delegations from Florida and Michigan.
<...>
Yes, there is a pattern — a familiar and unpleasant one. It is up to Mrs. Clinton to change it if she hopes to have any shot at winning the nomination or preserving her integrity and her influence if she loses.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/09/opinion/09fri1.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
70. LMAO! She wants to pick up delegates on the cheap...
Let's say they had a re-vote in Michigan and Florida. Who has the money to spend campaigning? Who would likely do better and pick up enough delegates to keep the gap from closing at all?

Obama.

So she doesn't want that. What she wants is a snapshot frozen in time when she had an advantage. She doen't want the "voices heard", she wants the "voices that she wants to hear".

I say hold new elections in both states. Watch what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #70
78. This thread is not about Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #78
83. Sure it isn't
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #78
94. Yeah, that's not TOO disingenous a statement or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
87. OK, plz explain
how US Representative Wexler had anything to do with the FL Legislature cutting in line against the rules?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
96. FL delegates WILL be seated in a FAIR COMPROMISE. It WILL happen !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC