Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strickland for Veep?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nyccitizen Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:45 AM
Original message
Strickland for Veep?

He's too old to be president in 8 years, but focusing on the short term, he does balance out the ticket and could help Obama carry the most crucial state on the map... thoughts?

From Novak, via RCP:

Support is growing in Democratic ranks for Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland as vice president. He would bring to the ticket maturity (66 years old), experience (six terms in Congress) and moderation (rated "A" by the National Rifle Association). He is very popular in Ohio, a state Republicans must carry to elect a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. I dont like strickland after his terrible yes-men look during Hillary's "Shame" Speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Was he the one
grinning and nodding behind her while she scared a lot of us with her Joan Crawford send-up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obama/Whoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. No!
Strickland's "bobblehead" performance here is enough to disqualify him. Ack!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjcT_sri_2E
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree. Absolutely no Bobblehead. That performance was just.. weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyccitizen Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. I hear ya but...

The guys who are probably best suited to help carry Obama into the White House are former Hillary supporters (Strickland, Rendell, Clark). We've got to get over the primary and start focusing on the real goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
griffi94 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. this is where i think the wheels might come off
if obama wants to win in november he'll need a broader coalition than what he has at the moment. that means he'll have to run to the middle. will the newer democrats who have joined him stay on when he's forced to play "politics as usual" to get elected and then to govern should he get elected, or will they be idealistic purists and jump ship or just stay home.
i've noticed his continuing support for war funding is often overlooked here, and i'm not trying to play "gotcha" but he has to walk a pretty fine line if he wants to win over the mushy middle.
i don't think it would be a good idea to offer hillary the veep spot, but he'll have to make some overture to the conservative/moderate wing of the party. not to mention the indies. as much as i think americans really want change, i think they'll vote for the same ole same rather than take a risk on what will be dubbed by the media and the gop as a radical liberal ticket.
how will his early supporters handle it when he's forced to compromise, and he will be. so far he's only gone after the democrats and even they're pretty evenly split. as much as the country is going to hell on a stick at the moment, mccain is still running just about even with both democratic contenders. imo the democrats can't win without peeling off some moderate repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. I could deal with it. But I think Ted's on the lower end of the short list.
I have no evidence to support that as a claim, since it's just a hunch.

Agree that it would make Ohio an easier challenge.

Kaptor and Brown deserve consideration from the Buckeye State, too. Love 'em both.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. If he can bring us Ohio, we need to do it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. Colin Powell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I don't dislike Powell, but the latest revelations that he signed off on torture
kind of put him back into the doghouse with me, just when he was starting to repair his image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
george_maniakes Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. i'd like powell as sec of state. He seems to think of international politics along the lines of ....
elder bush, which i think is a good thing. I mean the only other superpower in the world collapsed, and elder bush made it a pretty soft landing for the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Well Powell already was Secretary of State
and did a piss-poor job.

As for Bush, I think his failure to handle the collapse of the Soviet Union was monumental.

We knew that after repressive regimes across Europe fell, there would be problems. The problems in Kosovo were foreseeable and obvious, but there was no international plan for how to deal with it. We didn't seem to have a plan to deal with ANYTHING in a post-Soviet world. George just watched it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Not after this


And as much as I like Ted, I don't think he alone has the ability to deliver my state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Wouldn't it seem
almost too "political" of a choice? On the ticket for almost no other reason than he's from Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. I'd love someone from Ohio, Missouri or someone very strong from Florida
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
16. Sure, he'd be a good Veep.
For Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC