Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McAuliffe: Joint Ticket Would Be a "Great Idea"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
State the Obvious Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:17 AM
Original message
McAuliffe: Joint Ticket Would Be a "Great Idea"
Edited on Sat May-10-08 10:20 AM by State the Obvious
While everyone is wondering why Hillary will NOT drop out, Hillary is positioning herself to FORCE Obama to choose her for VP. :crazy:

She's trying to make the case that she can carry the voters (women, whites, Hispanic, working class etc.) as well as the states (Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Kentucky, etc.) that Obama cannot carry. She wants SOMETHING out of all of this. Bad idea.

(The above McAuliffe quote is from Talking Points Memo - can't get the link) Yesterday, on Larry King, McAuliffe talked about Hillary's HUGE COALITION that is her base, Lanny Davis mentioned that she has a base of (I think it was) 16 million.

To paraphrase Margaret Carlson...the Clintons were prepared to "win ugly", maybe they are ready to "lose ugly" as well.

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/05/mcauliffe_joint_ticket_would_b.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. If Terry said that...
then that is as good as Hillary saying it herself.

I still doubt that Obama will take her. There are too many other candidates that are a better match for him than Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. I wonder how many joints Terry smoked before he could say that?
That guy needs to get off of Fantasy Island with or without Mr. Roarke's help!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yea, well......
......the time when Obama couldn't win without Hillary on the ticket has passed. She may have that broad coalition she is yipping about - but she is not the only one who can bring him that.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. IMO, after all the dirty campaigning by Hillary...
...I think that she would be a negative and hurt Obama's chances of winning the GE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. McAuliffe: Asshat
No news here....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'd be open to the idea if McAuliffe promised to quit politics until the end of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here's the link from TPM:
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/05/mcauliffe_joint_ticket_would_b.php

And Terry's quote is followed by this from Greg Sargent:

Prediction: The public enthusiasm among top Hillary supporters for an Obama-Hillary ticket will rise roughly in proportion with their growing recognition that Obama is the party's presumptive nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Consider the source...
:boring:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. Does the phrase,
"Dont call us we'll call you" Ring a bell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. McAuliffe can go perform anatomically impossible acts upon himself. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
State the Obvious Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. It is still a case of OLD Washington vs. NEW Washington
Obama supporters want CHANGE. The Clintons do not represent change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. Right...a Great idea for the dying DLC dinosaurs. I SUPPORT REAL CHANGE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. BlooInBloo: He also does promos for Faux news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. That might be okay for Dems --
but how would that work in attracting Republicans, who historically don't like Hillary?

We have to heal our party, yes, but more than that at this moment, we have to win the White House!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
State the Obvious Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I agree. But that won't stop the Clintons.
"Win ugly" or "Lose ugly". They seem to be fine with either strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. I would hope the Party has carries more weight than what the Clintons want.
If not, fine -- let her stay in to the convention.

And I agree with you on their strategy. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. In Addition To Galvanizing The Cons
Her overall negatives are still high and she never gets above 48% approval. Really doesn't make her a genuinely attractive running mate. Further, the location, location, location aspect of choosing a veep is not in her favor either, he won't need her to get NY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. Hillary and her minions, including McAuliff, are no threat to us....
We don't have to buy into their absurd ideas and anger-baiting because they cannot harm us.

If we buy into their anger-baiting, we are feeding the hate that drives their campaign.

Hillary and certainly not McAuliff cannot force Obama to take Hillary as a VP. It is highly unlikely that Obama would choose Hillary on his own.

A suggestion: Follow Obama's advice. He knows they are no threat now, and so doesn't breathe life into their campaign by reacting to their anger-bait. He is focused on the future and winning the election, and that's what we need to do: keep our eyes forward, look to the future, and don't allow Hillary and her people to drag us back to the vicious, divisive past they have created.

When Hillary et al. offer up these seductive little anger-baiting tidbits, if we want we can acknowledge it, see it for what it is (an attempt to bait us into breathing life into their campaign), and move on, their campaign will suffocate on its own. Perhaps a comment like "There they go again. They're dangling that shiny anger-baiting object, but I won't bite."

During the primary when they were a threat, defense-by-offense was an appropriate and effective tool. But just like any tool, the job has changed, and continuing to rise to their anger-baiting when another tool (working to the future and having the patience it will take to unit the party for November) is now appropriate.

To continue to rise to their anger-baiting would be like using a shovel to dig a hole in the past, but now it's time to rake the leaves, and using a shovel would be an ineffective tool that would probably harm the underlying turf or plantings.

If we don't react to Hillary et al, like Obama is not reacting, they will continue to spiral out of control. They are looking for a reaction because as long as we are reacting, they can tell the media that Hillary is still a viable candidate, and this does nothing but breathe life into their campaign.

But if we let the Clintons and their campaign spiral out of control on their own, I think it will help heal the breach between the Hillary supporters and the Obama supporters. I think it will help nudge Hillary supporters over to perhaps reconsidering Obama. And, if Hillary et al. get out there enough, it may make Hillary supporters, on their own, think, "Hmmm. Perhaps Hillary isn't the right candidate for the Oval Office after all."

So this is my new mantra: PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. Clinton has assembled the most dislikeable group of campaign flunkies ever.
Edited on Sat May-10-08 10:39 AM by BlueManDude
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
18. "Going swimming, Barack? Here's an anvil for you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Now THAT is a short, powerful and visually evocative description...
of the outcome of Hillary as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The River Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
19. It Would Be Like Geo. Washington
appointing Benedict Arnold as his VP
to get the British vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
21. NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
24. No way in hell.


She has burned way too many bridges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
25. I could live with Strickland, but not Hillary herself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
26. Hell No,Big Dawg running around telling Obama what he should do would be a disaster
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. He implied that Obama wasn't patriotic and didn't love America.
I can't really think of a bigger insult to the nominee of your own party than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
27. I see the Clinton campaign is in the bargaining stage of grief now
We are getting there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sktmax Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
29. Ready Made Power House
I support Barack Obama.

I for one, believe that an Obama/Clinton ticket would be the best thing for the Democratic Party and this country.

Year 2008: 1st African American President, 1st Female Vice President. It implies unity..... black, white, male, female, etc.
Obama has already captured the "new school". These are our future leaders. Hillary has the "old school". These are our pillars.

The Republicans are going to do everything they can to tear Obama down. Remember the 1,200 and 1,000 page summaries they have on these 2. Hillary supporters who would be leaning towards Obama might flee, but with her on the ticket, they won't. Obama suporters who would flee might stay becasue of the strength of the ticket. McCain doesn't have alot of strong die-hard supporters. Both Obama and Clinton have extremely dedicated supporters. If they combine on a ticket, they would have a ready-builty powerhouse.
It would decrease the strength of the "race" weapon that the Republicans plan to use. "We ain't seen nothin yet". With a combined ticket, it might sting, but it won't kill us.

I am not sure how many people realize that the Democratic Party has to change the face of this nation.
It's the best way to end the bitterness and the battle and heal this country. Healing that has been needed for a very long time.
The question is: can Obama and Clinton, the Democratic Powers that be, and "we, the people" live up to the challenge?

forgiveness is the key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Hillary would sink the ship - she has blown it bigtime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
31. McCain and Hillary? since Hillary has been promoting McCain...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC