|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:33 AM Original message |
If She Ran as a Feminist, with Feminist Values, She Probably Would Have Beaten Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
1. Not exactly a related question: How did Margaret Thatcher run in the 1980s? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Isnt that the "old style politics" the OP mentioned? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. To be fair, the Prime Minister of Great Britain is elected differently than we elect a President ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
2. she was not allowed to. Any mention of feminisim, gender and she was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
3. No. She'd scare away too many men. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
4. Don't count your chickens before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
6. uh huh, and If ands and buts were candy and nuts we have Hanukah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libnnc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
7. BINGO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vi5 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
8. If she ran as a democrat she would have beaten Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
9. Honest answer: Her problem is that she ran as a Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. I think you're right. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. Ding, Ding, Ding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nancy Waterman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
10. The Great Irony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frickaline (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
11. yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
12. Women outnumber men as voters nationally and in most states.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. PBS broke down the female vote today. 49% voted for Clinton, 47% voted for Obama....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
15. No Way In Hell Would That Have Worked. Not A Chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Deleted message |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Okay, it would be a mistake for a woman to run as a woman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Stop Making Up Points That Weren't Put Forth To Begin With. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Wow, you alerted on me for calling your statement misogynistic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. There Ya Go With The Delusions Again. You Need To Get A Grip A Bit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 04:14 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Fish in a barrel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VotesForWomen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
20. heh. if only that were true. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
23. She's the anti-feminist - she pretends to be a man & then whines when big bad men are mean to her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
25. If she had started her Senate Career by doing the right thing, like with the IWR, she would've won. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
26. Exactly. What Jersey Devil said in post #9 too n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
29. If she wanted to run as a feminist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC