I just want to waste my third thread of the day...

Obama rocks. Hillary rocks. Dems rule. Repubs drool.

Wetzelbill/Kurovski '08

"McCain drools"? Or is it dribbles? ;)

It is a derogatory term that means drooler. And then there is pendejo, meaning pubic hair, and then there is..........

But I will say, he needs to quit mentioning things like WW2 and the Great Depression in his speeches. That just doesn't help. Neither does that guy who cuts his meat for him. Oh man, I just went over the line. :)

I failed on racism and sexism;)

Be guilty of that! Or Humanism!

I am definitely a foreign policy realist, since I am no longer under the umbrella of Catholicism I am now guilty of humanism (although they aren't mutually exclusive), my dad has albinism, can I count that? :hi:

Yeah....I could!

The British view: whoever wins the US election, John McCain is last

Source: Daily Telegraph

Obamamania sweeps Britain. So many primaries are being held in the American presidential contest that we thought the 51st state should not be left out. So Populus asked British voters which of the two Democrat challengers they preferred, and then, separately, to choose between either of the two Democrats and the Republican Senator John McCain.

The results are fascinating at several levels. First, and most obviously, Senator Barack Obama has caught the imagination of the British public across the board. He is both known and seen as fresh and exciting. Nearly a half of all voters (48 per cent), and the same proportion of men and women, and of Labour and Tory voters, prefer Senator Obama.

Hillary Clinton has won the backing of 35 per cent of the British public, with no difference between men and women. She receives most support among Labour voters, at 41 per cent, and least, 27 per cent, among Liberal Democrats, who are the keenest on Senator Obama, at 66 per cent. Only 17 per cent do not express an opinion either way.

Secondly, more than a half of British voters want to see a Democrat win in November. Senator McCain gains the support of a fifth or less of the public. Senator Clinton would win by 56 to 20 per cent, and Senator Obama by a virtually identical 54 to 19 per cent. Of course, the two Democrats have been in the news a lot more recently, though Senator McCain is one of the best-known American politicians in Britain.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article3897503.ece

next time I'll sell it to you. Take solace in that I am easily bribed.

First of all because I have three a day that I hardly ever use myself.

I do love the British voters though. But they are not the 51st state. That would be Canada. :hide: Hoping that these bricks protect against hockey sticks.

I would've considered giving you a percentage for your silence, now it's too late. :)

if I wasn't doing my best to get between a businessman and his easy money.

To introduce him to DU as a consideration for VP. Whadda ya think? Should MT let him go to nationwide? If I put together an OP, can I count on you for input?

hm

Although I'll send you a PM on why I selfishly don't want him to go nationwide. :)

Montana can't be great if America isn't great ;)

I should write a column on him as a way to help introduce him and all. If I do I'll let you know.

And I am not able to spend as much time at the keyboard as I like.

How's your weather? Green and muddy here.

but it's hot and sunny. :) On a serious note, I am so dreading the heat this summer.

I had ice and she was complaining :eyes: