Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Clinton campaign shows its UTTER CONTEMPT for the rules, the Democratic party and voters. . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:48 AM
Original message
The Clinton campaign shows its UTTER CONTEMPT for the rules, the Democratic party and voters. . .
. . .when it pushes the whole 2,209 number for total delegates. The RULES state 2,025 not 2,209 and on numerous occasions the Clinton campaign has acknowledged as much as evidenced below.

Hillary sees she has no chance of winning then she wants to change the rules. That is fucked up, FUCKED UP I tell you. By accepting 2,025 as the standard (which the campaign has done multiple times on the record) then moving the bar to 2,209 the Clinton campaign is showing utter contempt for the rules, the Democratic party and the voters.

Clinton supporter wonder why folks get so damned "nasty and mean" when it comes to Clinton they need to look no further than the moving of the delegate bar. AS SNL PUT IT LAST NIGHT, HILLARY HAS NO ETHICAL STANDARDS!!!

Before this campaign many Obama supporters (and supporters of other candidates) were fond of Hillary and would have been proud to support her in the general election, but we no longer feel that way and she has absolutely NO ONE to blame but herself and her campaign. This ain't the media's fault, this ain't Obama's fault its Hillary's fault.


From Kos:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/7/14213/15981/452/511101
Howard Wolfson, January 26:
This remains a delegate fight, with 1,681 delegates at stake on February 5th, and 2,025 needed to secure the nomination -- and we are ahead in that fight.

Howard Wolfson, February 12:
"We don’t think either candidate will be able to get 2,025 delegates without the superdelegates," Wolfson said during Monday’s briefing, a prediction that may come down to whether Clinton can stem Obama’s February momentum by taking the majority of Texas's and Ohio’s 389 delegates on March 4 (Vermont and Rhode Island also hold contests that day).

Howard Wolfson, February 13:
"Superdelegates are supposed to vote their conscience. ... That's essentially what my friend David Axelrod said on the Today show. ... No one is going to win the nomination without them. Our goal is to get to 2025 delegates. " - Howard Wolfson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes Hillary has contempt for anyone or anything that stands in her way
She lusts for power and will do ANYTHING to get it. Frightening how close she came to getting what she wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. OBAMA gets to 2209 Easily if you look at the numbers
so LET them push it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Even if he does the rules state 2,025 and Hillary she be called out for trying to change them. . .
. . .would Obama be allowed to do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. No, they should be called on it, EVERY TIME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Don't be surprised.
she is a republican hack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyToad Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. Her positions are almost exactly the same as Obamas
So, going by your flailing little rant, Obama is a republican hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Obama wants the will of the people to be respected.
hillary wants it tossed in the garbage.

Thats a pretty big difference.

Hillary supported war with Iraq ....Obama didn't

Another HUGE difference.

Shall I continue ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. behavior. she is using repug tactics. get over it. she has no honor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. How about "she uses Republican tactics"?
Fortunately, it seems to be backfiring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't the rule
a majority of the delegates? And that number will change depending on which delegations are seated, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Given the rules that are in play right now MI and FL don't count and until the rules committee. . .
. . .says otherwise, Hillary should play by the rules in place. She can lobby all she wants for the rules to change, but until they change the total is 2,025 and the Clinton campaign should be called out for their bullshit tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. So you are ok with changing the rules at the end of the game?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Is the rule 2025 delegates
or a majority of the seated delegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The rule is that MI and FLA are out and that 2025 is the number
and the Clinton campaign, as noted by the OP, is on the record agreeing with that multiple times. Do you think you are convincing anyone with your inane argument?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. The number only changes if the rules committee changes it. . .
. . .not when the Clinton campaign changes it. The Clinton campaign has to realize they are supposed to play by the rules, not make the rules. The arrogance is sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. What inane argument am I making?
I'm asking if the rule is 2025 delegates, or the majority of the delegates. You won't answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. The rules are also that you follow the schedule of primaries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Why won't anybody answer the simple question...
is the rule 2025 delegates, or is it the majority of the seated delegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Disgusting McAwful on MTP right now
Tim just pulled out a quote from 2003/2004 when Michigan tried to jump ahead of NH. Then DNC-Chairman McAuliffe was furious and said EXACTLY what Dean has said this election cycle.

Why is it okay for this to happen NOW when McAwful is Chariman of Clinton's campaign? What's in it for Terry McAwful?

Disgraceful set of double-standards when it comes to the Clintons. I hope they disappear from public view. And soon. :mad: :mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Looking forward to 6/1 when the rules committee gives.....
the smackdown. Hillarites' heads will assplode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Hope so...but she does have that deck stacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. At that point
people start worrying more about their political futures. The deck may not be as stacked as we think.

16 members of Congress signed her letter last week. She has 78 endorsements from congress. The rest couldn't be found to sign the letter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. I wouldn't get my hopes up
THe committee is in the tank for clinton interms of numbers of supporters, maybe they'll look at it objectively like they did with the SAME composition of people nearly a year ago. Or maybe they'll just explain it by saying: "We were for the stripping of the delegates...before we were against it". I can't understand why Ickes won't recuse himself, I think by the standards of many, judging a paid client in a matter relating to a case which is basically tied to your job description for that client (helping them win)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. Anything besides seating them as-is is a loss for Clinton
And her most partisan supporters will have fits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. It really is contemptible
But our friends here on the other side will avoid the obvious and tell us how wrong it is to disenfranchise all of those voters. They will not address the idiocy and mendacity of the loser attempting to re-write the rules of the game just before the clock runs out. They can't.

Obama was my third choice after my first and second choices failed. It really is time for Clinton's supporters to stop supporting her. Her campaign terminated a long time ago as a viable effort to win the 2008 nomination. Come and join us and help us beat down the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. The time to complain about voter disenfranchisement was BEFORE voters were told they didn't count.
The Clintons and their DLC sycophants big-footed the DNC at that time and the FUBAR was assured. The rank hypocrisy of the Clinton campaign comes out LOUD and CLEAR.

Speaking as a Michigan voter, all I wanted was some respect and ATTENTION from the Democratic candidates to the severe economic problems in this state. Instead, we were told that we were "uppity" and the decades-long PRIVILEGE of demographically conservative states was sacrosanct.

The FUBAR cannot be undone. Period. Hillary's behavior merely exacerbates it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. Funny how she only talks about the disenfranchisement of HER voters in Michigan
And yet she wants the MI and FL delegates seated as is, with no delegates for Obama in Michigan. Never mind all the people who weren't able to vote for their candidates in Michigan because they had honorably removed their names from the ballots as agreed. It's proof that she cares about herself, and not the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
20. Hillary loves us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. Except the MoveOn members and the activists.
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. Hillary wants the presidency. Nothing less.
And she whatever she needs to do to get it, regardless of consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC