Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DU, are we going with 2025 or 2210 to decide the nominee?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:31 PM
Original message
DU, are we going with 2025 or 2210 to decide the nominee?
As an Obama supporter, I believe the original number of 2025 set by the DNC stands as a result of FLA/MI breaking the rules. If there is any compromise to seat the delegates, it should not be representative of the actual votes in the two illegitimate contests. Barring a redo (which would be most fair to the voters), I could fathom some seating formula which reflects the national popular vote percentage.

Hillary and her communications director Wolfson have now shifted the number from 2025 to 2210. Mr. Wolfson has said he would not even consider an exit strategy for Hillary unless the delegates from FLA/MI were seated. That sounds like an empty threat. And yet, even if we get past 2025, Hillary may elect to take her new numeric to the convention for a floor fight.

That being said, I acknowledge my view is biased. I know the good moderators of DU have worked hard to maintain a nonpartisan position in the Obama vs Hillary battle. Which brings me back to the OP question:

Once a nominee is known or official - per Skinner & Co., we begin that last week to chill or vent. Yet which number are we going with to translate it into an official or known nominee? 2025 or 2210?

Or will we need to wait until our party's nominee is making an acceptance speech at the convention to know the answer?


peace~:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. 2025 has been the number for months
Fuck this Hillary "move the goalposts again" fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I agree, but many Hillary supporters do not - where does that leave DU?
In an effort to not take sides, if Hillary refuses to drop out --- we may have to wait all the way till late August to really know who our official nominee is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Hillary and her supporters do not make the rules.
Until the rules committee decides otherwise - the number is 2025.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is there anyone besides Hillary who is pushing for the 2210 number?
And, who makes the final decision? Certainly not one of the candidates... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I'm guessing LaRouche
Hey, the fat lady ain't even warming up her voice yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Possibly neither.
On the likelihood that FL and/or MI will have a portion of their delegates stripped, even if some ARE seated, then the total will be somewhere in between.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm Going With Obama Already Won nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Personally, I agree - but how will DU recognize when it's officially over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Are those delegate counts, or projections on what year Clinton will quit campaigning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. BWAAHAHA nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. 2025
Until the Party says otherwise. If the party decides 2210 thant thats the number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well, lets hope the rules committee makes a definitive determination on 5/31 n/t
Edited on Fri May-16-08 06:44 PM by RiverStone
Or is it the credentials committee?

I have been corrected for using both incorrectly or correctly. Thanks :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I think when Howard Dean and the Party declares someone the winner, it will be over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Makes sense - it would be remarkable for Hillary to fight on after that...
Of course, assuming Dean and the DNC say it's Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. We aren't her supporters
Its the rules committee. The credentials committe meets at the end of June.

We follow the rules and respect that the DNC will have a fair process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Rules vs Credentials committee - I stand corrected
Or not.

I still get them mixed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm going to go with - none of the above.
If some sort of negotiated seating of Florida occurs, but with only half their delegates being counted (the same could happen in MI), that would result in a different number that 2025 or 2210.

But that will not happen until after Obama reaches 2025 - and with Hillary having moved the goal posts so many times the media has pretty much tuned her out on the topic, along with most people that are tired of hearing her cry wolf - so from the meaningful standpoint of super delegate perception, I suspect the magic number is 2025.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. At this point,
I don't think it matters. Obama has won either way! The campaign vs McOlderthandirt has begun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Gotta go with 2025 untill it's changed, but it may be neither 2025 NOR 2210
if they decided to seat half of the delegates in each state, like the repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC