|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:40 PM Original message |
LA Times - Obama sees huge jump in wealth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted sub-thread |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm sure that has positively NOTHING to do with all the books he's sold. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampshireDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. BINGO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
25. It's been a helluva book tour. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. Hillary lent her campaign way more than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. It won't escalate much while in office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. He's WAY richer than the Clintons were at that age. They were poor schmucks in their forties. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM7nj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 08:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
33. The Clintons didn't have 2 bestselling books at that age. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-18-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. No, they didn't. Imagine how wealthy they'd be now, if they had. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
7. Uh, the Clintons emerged in massive debt... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
8. Uhm, the problem was elitist Hillary trying to paint Obama as one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
9. Source of wealth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampshireDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
10. Funny, that, but I'm not a subscriber either and found the link just fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. BINGO! Now you get the gold star! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampshireDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Once again, teh great gazoogle comes to our rescue! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. Waiting for the OP to respond to this Exciting Discovery of the Original ARTICLE ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. Odds OP replies substantively to this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Z to the third; zip, zero, zilch. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
31. OP was a hit and run anyways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knixphan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-18-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
36. ding ding ding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
11. And if Obama ditches his integrity, he can cut a $20 million deal with Dubais like Bubba. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
12. If the Clintons' income was only from their books, nobody would have complained. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigbrother05 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
13. I can't imagine Bush getting paid for anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. He won't get his deposit back, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
15. OMG ! Only $100 million more and he can be as POPULIST as the Clintons !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chascarrillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
16. Wow. Their net worth is approximately 7% that of the Clintons. Winning attack, there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
19. This thread is Hillaryious! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PleaseSayItAintSo (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. What I was just thinking ... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. As a "fan" of neither Obama nor Clinton ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. I'm too am a fan of neither but I see the delusionism in both sides |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Butch350 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
20. Perks of the Job... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
23. So...that makes him worth what, 6% of what the Clintons are? What an elitist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
29. ## DON'T DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
30. What about the Clinton's $18 million still unaccounted for? Whatever... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-17-08 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
32. Deleted message |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-18-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Because it's not required. Why don't you read the DU rules about that? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-18-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
37. The Clintons did not emerge from the White House rich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wvbygod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-18-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
38. Too bad he did not spread some money around here in WV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 15th 2024, 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC