Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's Struggle With Typical Liberal Hypocrisy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 05:14 AM
Original message
Obama's Struggle With Typical Liberal Hypocrisy
Obama's Struggle With Typical Liberal Hypocrisy

From the beginning it's been fairly clear a big chunk of supposedly liberal America hasn't been ready for Barack Obama. Their unease obvious in the shock and awe of Joe Biden, and in Newsweek's inane, aloud wonderings of whether or not Obama was "black enough." "Black enough" for the liberals being people of color in the Sharpton/Jackson mold; Old Schoolers devoutly wed to the regressive ideology of loud haranguing and low expectations. Obama -- early on in a Pound Cake-esque fashion urging people of color to do better and questioning race-based affirmative action -- was clearly not "black enough" for the Liberal Plantation.

Any doubt that Obama was from the jump fighting not only for the presidency, but also against Lefty hypocrisy was shattered into a million pieces by Geraldine Ferraro's "lucky" black man remark. Those pieces then again refined by Clinton's talk of "hard-working Americans, white Americans."


Clearly much of the liberal Left has long seen...oh, your average non-hard-working black, as nothing more than a piece of a loyal voting bloc. Keep us anesthetized, they feel, with promises of hand outs and government mollycoddling and we will mindlessly check the "D" box on Election Day.

Conservatives are, of course, not a hair less bigoted in their hearts (nor are Independents or anyone else for that matter). But unlike Democrats, Republicans have found a way to play nicely with the ideologically aligned, regardless of the color of their skin.

That, perhaps, is part of the problem; Obama is more his own man than merely a Democratic tool. That he refused to put up a show, and then capitulate, makes him all the more frustrating to those on the Left used to their people of color playing by pre-prescribed rules.

In that regard it's too bad Obama's not an anti-war Republican. His "Yes We Can" message of hope, his Morning in America redux, would have worked much better had it not be drowned out by the typical gloom and doom drum beat of the liberal machine. And all that clack about him being elitist? Well, the Right's managed to sneak in a "down to earth" Ivy League president two cycles running. As both sides make a grab for the middle, imagine what the Right could have done with the likes of Obama.


Which is not to say that Obama won't still be elected president. At this point I think there's nothing that he can't do. Though, if so, he will do it despite the best efforts of the typical hypocrisy of the Left.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-ridley/obamas-struggle-with-typi_b_102176.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. What the hell is this author smoking?
"But unlike Democrats, Republicans have found a way to play nicely with the ideologically aligned, regardless of the color of their skin." Yeah, that is correct, because the repukes have become a 1 color party... there's a reason minorties flock to the Democratic Party, and it's because all too many repukes are RACISTS.

This article seems to be a bit disjointed and suffering from bouts of confusion, as it seems to condemn Obama because he's not black enough, and then that liberals are racist, blue-collar-exploiters. To say no idealogy is more racist or bigoted than the other is pure bullshit. I do not see homosexual liberals seeking to deny others their rights nor do I see hispanic leaders here trying to condemn the entire actions of white people. The KKK, David Duke, and the Phelps clan are all idealogue right-wingers, and have no welcome in our Democratic Party. It is republican leaders that speak at neo-nazi meetings, condemn other human beings as vile, disgusting sinners merely because of what they do in the bedroom. I take especial offense that this "author" claimed that the "Liberal plantation" (as obvious a racebaiting phrase you will see) will not accept Obama because he is not "black enough." Well, I am an upscale white liberal from a red state that recently decided to say 'fuck it' to evolution in schools, and I whole-heartedly support Obama, not because he is black, but because he is a leader with unquestionable integrity, intelligence, compassion, and tenacity.

John Ridley is a pathetic excuse for a writer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Defend Liberalism not Liberals and it will work out fine
Edited on Sun May-18-08 05:48 AM by democracy1st
meaning liberal philosophy is great for this country,but just because someone call's themself a liberal or conservative doesn't tell you where their heart is at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. YES!
and I for one, agree with this writer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just when I thought the republican cons had learned something
about race and elections, they come out with more of the same lies and hypocrisy.

First is there anything the repukes will not blame on liberals like me? We seem to be responsible for every known horror in the universe. From the republican Great Depression to the Bin Laden attacks on 9/11 (Now just who is buddies with the Bin Ladens?), the neocons are back to claiming liberals are the devil. I'm a liberal and I have not eaten any babies or drowned any puppies. Have you?

Next their meme about Obama not being Black enough was introduced by none other than Oxycotin Rush. Last time I looked, Rush Limpball was a repuke. He was the one going around saying Obama was half an African American. So why is this poster claiming it is Liberal hypocrisy when the whole freaking idea of not black enough came from the standard bearer for conservative maniacs?

In psychology it is call projection. A defense mechanism in which one attributes one’s own unacceptable or unwanted thoughts or/and emotions to others. Projection reduces anxiety by allowing the expression of the unwanted subconscious impulses/desires without letting the conscious mind recognize them, Projecting your faults onto someone else.

This trick has been played some many times by the right I'm surprised the poster bought it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. whether or not we disagree with the writer it's one thing
but not fighting the right as a opposition party has merit. Think about it how in the hell are you going to have blacks come out in record numbers in Florida and Ohio. Get screwed out of their vote and the only thing you worry about is whether or not America will be turned off by your defense of a legitimate illegal practice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't "typical liberal hypocrisy" what the REPUBLICANS are supposed to say?
Edited on Sun May-18-08 06:25 AM by Perry Logan
Your browser may have misdirected you here. This is Democratic Underground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. How could anyone call themselves Liberal/Progressive turn around and vote McCain
Edited on Sun May-18-08 06:39 AM by democracy1st
because they don't like Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The Obama people have called everyone I know and love a racist. What should I do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obama's message has been drowned out?
Makes you wonder how come he's, ya know, winning...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. I don't follow the trajectory here. "The Left" is an amorphous whole,
except when it is considered in parts, of which the same is said of any demographic.

The media are so timid and corporate (all at once) that "the Left" is hardly visible at all, except to people who go to union meetings and visit libraries and bookshops, etc.

Obama's success in 2007-08 appears to me as involving his campaign's command of events and is not, strictly speaking, a politically ideologically-driven campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-18-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. you don't like liberals and the left?
:wtf: are you doing here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC