Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Kyle Syndrome

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:41 AM
Original message
The Kyle Syndrome
From the South Florida Sun-Sentinel
The Kyle Syndrome
Symptoms include narcissism, political naiveté and a temporary leave of one's senses.

The Stephanie Miller Show, the morning show syndicated on local liberal talk-radio station WINZ-AM (940), boasts a recurring character named "Kyle," voiced by Miller's sidekick Jim Ward. Kyle, a prissy, geeky-voiced Hillary Clinton supporter, {Actually, Kyle is never identified to be a supporter of either candidate.} threatens gloom and doom upon the Democratic Party if Clinton isn't nominated, saying he will vote for McCain to punish the party. The joke, of course, is that anyone could have such a distended, overripe ego that he would expect a political party to kowtow to his wishes, regardless of the party's nominee having legitimately gained the most delegates.

But nationwide, Kyle is a very real problem. In various polls conducted throughout March and early April, about a fifth of all Clinton supporters say they would not vote for Barack Obama in the general election; a slightly smaller but still significant amount of Obama supporters say the same thing about Clinton. And here in Florida, the Kyle Syndrome is more powerful than in most areas, fed by the sense that our votes have been stolen away by the state's decision to hold an early primary against party rules, and that Obama is somehow to blame for the situation in which we now find ourselves. We hear the words "If Clinton loses, I'm voting for McCain" or some variation on that theme almost ubiquitously; it is overheard in smoky bars, among co-workers in office elevators and at the next table at The Olive Garden down the street, leaving Obama supporters and hardcore Democrats gasping and red-faced, exasperated at the very notion. But the trend cannot be denied. In the most-recent general election poll of the state, a May 1 poll from Quinnipiac University, Clinton beats McCain 49-41, while Obama loses 44-43. That represents one of the widest margins between the two candidates in any state for which there is recent polling — a nine-point Kyle gap.

The notion, at first blush, seems to defy any sort of common sense. Here we have two candidates — Clinton and Obama — who are remarkably similar on nearly all the major issues of the day, from health care to Iraq to the economy and so on. On the other hand, we have a candidate who represents everything dumb and mean in the American character — more war, more deregulation, more domestic surveillance, more piggish profits for the wealthiest few while the rest of us lap crumbs off the floor. Why, then, would a supporter of one of the first two candidates cast aside the other and go for the third? Looked at from a purely policy-oriented point of view, it does not compute.

But let me tell you, ace, they are out there, and they are angry. Last week, a group of about 150 Floridians protested outside the Washington, D.C., headquarters of the Democratic National Committee. According to NBC's report on the protest, despite buttons, T-shirts and other gear that included the names of many Democratic candidates, even some who have since dropped out of the race, nearly all the people at the protest were Clinton supporters. And this was a week after Clinton supporters held count-our-vote rallies in cities across Florida. But the outraged cries that votes weren't counted or that voters were disenfranchised are misinformed. This is a primary election. You obey the rules of the party or there are consequences. Every single person now bleating that their voice has not been heard did, in fact, cast a vote Jan. 29. They were not disenfranchised, and they'll still be able to vote in November. You don't have to like our system — don't get me started on the stupidity of the two-party system, or I'll swing into a long, wonky diatribe about the need for proportional representation — but you do have to accept that you are living within it. The irony is that if these Clinton supporters wanted to blame someone, it shouldn't be Obama, but the very Florida politicians who are now speaking out at their rallies. It wasn't Obama who moved Florida's voting date to Jan. 29, it was our state Legislature, Democrat and Republican alike.

More:
http://www.newsday.com/topic/sfl-cldanation07citymay07,0,4793450.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, the actual Kyle IS a Hillary supporter
There was a real guy named Kyle who called in and threatened to vote for McCain if Hillary wasn't selected as the nominee. I've yet to hear an Obama (or Edwards or Biden or Kucinich or Gravel or Richardson or Dodd) supporter do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That would make Kyle a McCain supporter. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. There was a guy who did that, but I don't think his name was Kyle. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm pretty sure it was, but I've been wrong before.
The first "Kyle" routine was just an improvised rip on the caller. Then Jim just continued it, making Kyle more and more childish each time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Of course, that gap has nothing to do with the fact that Obama hasn't campaigned there,
while Clinton enjoys incumbent recognition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC