|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 08:53 AM Original message |
2210, no such number; Obama clinches the pledged delegate majority today. Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hokies4ever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
1. Where do you get off using math to analyze Hillary's logic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
2. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheap_Trick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
3. don't confuse the issue with your FACTS and NUMBERS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Yup. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
4. Guam superdelegate for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
5. Damn that sexist math! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Really, why do they hate math? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
localroger (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Why does math hate Hillary? /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pompano (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
8. What is this 2210 number? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 06:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. Actually it was the number Obama agreed to when he entered the race last year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haymakeragain (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:55 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Hillary agreed in writing to 2024. Waiting to hear the "pop" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. She agreed not to campaign in MI and FL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
9. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EnviroBat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'm just a simple Caveman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
12. The numbers from KY are coming in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
13. KY 21% reporting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
14. Pledged delegate majority is arbitrary and meaningless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 06:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. No it isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StevieM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
16. Well then isn't it as shame that Obama won't be the nominee until he reaches 2210 (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 06:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I take it you didn't understand the OP? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
18. Obama cannot claim delegates that are not officially 'pledged' yet, such as Texas caucus delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 06:54 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Still doesn't change the dynamics. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 06:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. You posted 'Obama clinches the pledged delegate majority today' and that is wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. No it isn't, he needs 14. The pledged delegates in TX are not going to change by 45 or more. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. The caucus delegates in Texas will not be 'pledged' until the State Convention in June. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Doesn't change the dynamics. What don't you understand? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. He will not 'clinch' the 'pledged' delegates by stating some number. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Yes, the numbers are listed in his column. He doesn't have to lie like Hillary's popular vote n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:16 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Wrong. Obama has 304 soft delegates that will not be pledged until the state conventions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:18 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. The operative word: has n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Wrong again. The operative word is SOFT not pledged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haymakeragain (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. So how's she gonna steal 'em? Inquiring minds want to know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kukesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
24. Myrtle Strong Enemy ROCKS! Great photo. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
31. Someone get the Stage hook... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-20-08 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
34. Done! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
35. Math is hard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
37. Hillary's impossible math doesn't improve with FL and MI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC