|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
markbark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 05:48 AM Original message |
_Justice_ Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 05:49 AM Response to Original message |
1. This is the scenario I've been wanting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 07:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Why? Of all the potential justices, Hillary qualifications are scant, at best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 07:53 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Because it will continue to be an important by-line to this election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wapsie B (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 05:52 AM Response to Original message |
2. That I would love to see! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Window (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 05:54 AM Response to Original message |
3. I think Hillary would make a great justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 05:56 AM Response to Original message |
4. one problem: She failed the DC bar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 06:03 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. And retook it and passed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dems_rightnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 07:06 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. No requirements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MattBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 05:59 AM Response to Original message |
5. There is no way in hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DangerDave921 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 06:02 AM Response to Original message |
6. qualifications? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 06:10 AM Response to Original message |
8. She's not qualified by a long, long way, to be on the SC, and she's untrustworthy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 06:16 AM Response to Original message |
9. oh come on, she is not qualified by any stretch of the imagination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccharles000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 06:27 AM Response to Original message |
10. I would love her to be on the SC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 07:24 AM Response to Original message |
12. The Supreme Court is not a consolation prize for defeated politicians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 07:25 AM Response to Original message |
14. NNNNNOOOOOOOOOO!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
15. I'd get someone about 10 or 15 years younger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ekwhite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
17. Works for me. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC