|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ithinkmyliverhurts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:45 AM Original message |
Other than for "unifying" reasons, what sort of strategic reasons are there for Clinton as VP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. NONE! HRC is one big embarrassment to both the democratic party and her (my) gender. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
2. I have no idea why this Hillary-VP shit is suggested, other than she's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
3. None. Her negatives are second only to Bush's. She's would kill any ticket she was on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
4. Well, she would provide an effective (but unfortunately hardly painless) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoonerPride (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
5. She brings nothing but negatives to the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeeDeeNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
6. I don't know that she is really qualified to be president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hendo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
7. Nothing, she brings too many negatives to the campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Graybeard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
8. Does not conform with Obama's message of "Change". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
9. No strategic reason - a complete waste of a much needed Democratic US Senator....nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
10. None. She doesn't deliver Arkansas, and she doesn't have national security credentials. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
11. She is hugely unpopular outside her base of party loyalists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
12. Obama could announce he was just kidding about change and then put Clinton on the ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peaches2003 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
13. Qualified for V-P??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Writer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
14. She will pull in blue collar white voters and some older women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ithinkmyliverhurts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Aren't there others who could pull in the same . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HarveyBrooks (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
15. None. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peaches2003 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Your avatar really convinces me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HarveyBrooks (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 08:53 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. As yours does for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ithinkmyliverhurts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:44 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Have you read your sig. line lately? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudythescribbler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
18. I say -- A WOMAN NOT HILLARY, but could she FORCE herself on the ticket? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
20. The only "strategic" reason for it is to insure the survival of the DLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 15th 2024, 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC