|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:04 PM Original message |
Why did Bill Clinton take his name off the Delaware ballot in 1996? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. So you admit that candidates took their name off in Michigan in deference to NH and Iowa voters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yeah, and in accordance with party rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 11:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
21. How come they didn't take them of in Florida? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-23-08 12:31 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I don't think state law allowed them to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Actually to Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. In the words of Dick Cheney: So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampshireDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Don't expect a reply from the hit-and-runners among us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamthebandfanman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. lol i know n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. What's your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I was being sarcastic. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
8. The obvious answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Seems you agree that it is a matter of expediency rather than principle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
9. To get to the other side???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky 13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
10. Well well well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. I NEVER KNEW THAT!! (But it helps highlight the HYPOCRICY of the Hillary camp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I don't know what made me think about it, but I remember reading that in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
15. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
16. kickocrisy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 08:41 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Cool word! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
17. , |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
19. Because he doesn't CARE about Delaware voters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 11:16 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Could be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 15th 2024, 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC