Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ahem, excuse me.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:19 PM
Original message
Ahem, excuse me.....
Super delegates don't vote until the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't worry, Hillary will concede soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. not officially, but they can disclose who they intend to vote for
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Was there another conference call
and we missed out on it? I swear you guys move in a posting pack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. McAuliffe was saying that on the Teevee today. Now they've all picked it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Ah the great leader's
vile mouth piece has spoken. We must Parrot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. really, I didn't hear him say that, but I work during the day. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. I'm sure you picked up the daily talking point
somewhere. Maybe the daily email begging for money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. Yes, the Independent Freethinking 'bots always claim they've never heard anyone else say it
as they parrot that day's talking-head talking points word for word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Wonder what tommorow brings
Caucuses sucks, Obama is a sexist, so goes PR so goes the nation, there is something scary in Obama's closet but we don't want to share yet.

So many options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #21
65. OOoooohh! The "Get a job, hippies!" shout-back. You know who else uses that? (NT)
Edited on Thu May-22-08 07:34 AM by Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ahem... Popular vote doesn't count at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Nile is the only major river that runs south to north.
Isn't that fascinating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Denial is the only major .... oh... nevermind.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. wrong
Edited on Wed May-21-08 09:48 PM by swampg8r
the saint johns river runs south to north
it is considered a major river because of the volume of water it dumps into the sea each day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I knew there would a disputatious wise acre out there
fine. the 'saint johns river' is now one of the major rivers of the world. sheesh. way to wreck a bad joke. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #38
55. ahem
The St. Johns River (officially Saint Johns River, but commonly spelled St. John's River) is the longest river in the U.S. state of Florida, stretching 310 miles (500 km) from Indian River County to the Atlantic Ocean in Duval County. The St. Johns River is the second longest river in the United States that flows in a generally northwards direction. It was designated as one of the American Heritage Rivers in 1997 and pegged by an environmental organization as the 6th Most Endangered River in America in 2008. <1>.

The elevation change from headwaters to mouth is only about 30 feet, making the St. Johns one of the world's "laziest" rivers<1>. Its extremely low velocity, combined with the generally level elevation, causes the St. Johns to spread out to a great width for much of its course. During periods of low flow, the river can be influenced by tides as far south as Lake Monroe - 161 miles inland<1>. For a distance of over twenty miles before arriving at downtown Jacksonville, the river's average width exceeds two miles, and in some places, exceeds three miles in width. The slow flow of the St. Johns makes it difficult for pollutants to be flushed from the waters, which has become a serious problem for the river ecosystem<1>. Still, the river is home to numerous species of plants and animals. It is not uncommon to see dolphins in the river east of Jacksonville and manatees in the springtime when the water warms up. Alligators, bald eagles, ospreys, stingrays, and many species of fish—both salt and fresh water—are found living in the river and on its banks. The entire basin is managed by the St. Johns Water Management District.


pretty major
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconicgnom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #55
63. sounds major lazy to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #55
64. Everything in gd:p is a fight
Length 6,650 km (4,132 mi)
Basin 3,400,000 km² (1,312,747 sq mi)
Discharge
- average 2,830 m³/s (99,941 cu ft/s)

That is a major river. One of the planet's great rivers.

Length: 310 mi (500 km)
Basin 8840 square miles
Discharge: 664 cu ft/s

That is not a major river. It is the largest river in Florida. Half of it is tidal.


The longest rivers in the United States:
Missouri: 2,540 miles
Mississippi: 2,340 miles
Yukon: 1,980 miles
Rio Grande: 1,900 miles
St. Lawrence: 1,900 miles
Arkansas: 1,460 miles
Colorado: 1,450 miles
Atchafalaya: 1,420 miles
Ohio: 1,310 miles
Red: 1,290 miles
Brazos: 1,280 miles
Columbia: 1,240 miles
Snake: 1,040 miles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #64
70. how dare you throw my river under the bus (boat?)?
its people like you who single handedly decide what constitutes a great river that are holding americas rivers back
bah
bah i say

if you make one more crack about the saint johns river im going to vote for the
cane creek in etowah tennessee and you and your "great" river can do without my vote OR my support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:22 PM
Original message
Ahem, Hillary signed the same pledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's over for Clinton...
now we wait for her to bow out gracefully, or be gently nudge to the curb. Her choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. then the primaries don't count, the caucuses don't count, because the pledged delegates
aren't really 'pledged' according to your twisted logic because the only time they're truly 'pledged' is when they vote at the Convention, against the wishes of the voters in the caucus states and the primary states according to Hillary's logic in getting the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. These are endorsements not votes. delegates are apportioned according to votes. The super D's have
not voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Clinton said the pledged delegates really aren't pledged. She's hoping at the convention the pledged
delegates vote in her favor, even if they're from states Obama won, which then would defeat the entire idea of having a Democratic primary in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. some are and some are not. and the ones that are, are only so on the first ballot
after that, they can do what they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Pledged delegates can do whatever they want whenever they want, really. Your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. she`s reminds me of the woman in the "taxi scene" from

"woman on the verge of a nervous breakdown"......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Neither have the pledged D's. Your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. what is a convention for. the process is obviously not over, get it now? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. At 2025, it's over. There's nothing more Hillary can do. She can stomp her feet and refuse
to back off, but at that point it becomes impossible for her to win. Delegates have never once in the history of the party gone back from the point of presumptive nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. But why would you WANT this to go on that long?
Everyone knows if we drag this to the convention Dems lose. Dragging it to the convention is like a murder-suicide. Dragging it to the convention ensures a McCain Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. why do we lose? Are we going to lose Congress too?
Looks to me that this is a good way of showing the Ds nationally and keeping interest focused on the Ds rather than on the Rs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Previous primaries that have gone to convention result in a LOSS.
Does history mean nothing? Are you not fucking paying attention? If we ignore history it is to our own peril.

Her dragging this thing to convention IS a 2008 murder-suicide. She's now hoping 2012 will be her year and is willing to fuck over the party and hand the white house to McCain to best position herself for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. 1912 belies what you just said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #51
66. Really? What about 1980?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #51
67. 1912? 1912??? Did you really just say 1912?
Yes, please expound on the relevance of the 1912 experience to today's political process.

Fuck, I knew Clinton's demographics skewed older, but... 1912? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. nothing counts until the convention
hillary will win the nomination because everyone will feel sorry for her...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Neither do pledged delegates. Your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. so what is a convention for? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Plenty of things. Show of party unity, creation of a platform, nomination of a candidate. What do
you mean by "superdelegates don't vote until the convention?" Neither do pledged delegates. At 2025 delegate endorsements, though, a candidate is presumed to be the nominee. At the convention, that is made official.

Technically, John McCain is not the nominee. Their delegates don't vote until the convention either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. good, now you get it. this is to close, it is not your normal primary where some one has
is sewn up after NH.

Hillary has a right to go to the convention and I hope she does just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. It is not 'to close' at all.
Obama has won. That is the situation, that has been the situation, and that will be the situation in Denver. Clinton is dragging this out, and dragging her faithful supporters along with her, for no good reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #31
45. Ted Kennedy took it to the convention with WAY less delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. What happened to the party that year? Refresh my memory. We won, right?
Edited on Wed May-21-08 09:59 PM by Occam Bandage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Nope. Obama will have long reached 2025. Hillary can claim she's in it all she wants, but
she's out of options at 2025. There is literally nothing she can do except beg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. Close has nothing to do with anything
More delegates is more delegates. Period.

You can lose an election by 1 vote. Its still a loss, not "open for debate"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
62. close? CLOSE?
oh wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. It is supposed to be the TV Kick Off Event for the fall campaign
and has played this role for quite some time. The nominee has not actually been chosen in any real sense 'at the convention' in my entire life. But you know that. You are not an idiot, you are just making arguments for the sake of arguing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avenger64 Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
23. Good point, and they can change their 'endorsments' from one ...
... candidate (say, Obama) to another (say, Clinton) at any time between.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. If that is the case
then Edwards should come in a make a case for the Superdelegates to pick him throwing the nomination process to a second ballot and hoping for the best. In other words, using the "superdelegates can change their minds" argument is bullshit. If either Obama or Clinton use this argument I would assume they are fucking delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avenger64 Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. I'd say Clinton stands a quite better chance than Edwards, wouldn't you?
Especially if she's ahead in the popular vote, and way ahead (as she is) counting the electoral votes in the states she's won.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. They stand the same chance
which is none. Edwards can claim that the two candidates are tainted and the party needs a new start. That is just as good to use as the bullshit meme about Hillary winning the popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avenger64 Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. "none?"
I think Hillary could actually win on the first ballot if the superdelegates decide she is best to beat John McCain, and simply voter for her.

I mean, mathematically speaking, seems like a chance to me. Of course, I'm just a math teacher. What do I know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Evidentially, not politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avenger64 Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Well, I think Senator Clinton seems to understand them ...
... she's taking a measured risk. It may pay off, may not. But certainly she has some chance of making it work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. And where, exactly, did you get that perception? From her deft guiding of her campaign
Edited on Wed May-21-08 10:20 PM by Occam Bandage
from 30 points up, with 200 superdelegates day of endorsement, with 98% name recognition and 80% favorability in the party, with more cash than anyone in history before her...to $20M in debt, 20 points down, and with no realistic shot left? Was it her brilliant strategy to ignore caucus states, or was it her intelligent plan to concentrate on only a few big states, letting Obama rack up huge margins everywhere else?

I also used to think she was a savvy politician. This campaign has disabused me of that notion. She hasn't a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avenger64 Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Well, she's a U.S. Senator, right?
How about you? Unless I'm mistaken, you're just another guy talking shit on the internet. Senator certainly pays better.

I think she's done pretty well considering the media has been carrying Obama on their shoulders, gushing over his ambiguous 'hope-and-change' message, playing along with this refusal to fuzz up the plebeians heads with too many specifics. Every article they've written about her has come with a 'but...', and here she is with a lead in the popular vote.

That ought to count for something, if you consider it seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #54
73. She only has a "lead" in the popular vote if you count the by her, discounted votes of...
... Florida and Michigan and discount FOUR CAUCUS STATES of which the total votes are still not known.

She agreed and signed the agreement, even called the primary election in Michigan "a beauty contest" for all it's voting.

Now, of course, she's lost against an unknown black man far more savvier than her snootiness could've comprehended, and by the very rules she herself agreed to, now she's the Grand Crusader of Michigan and Florida voters?

Tell me honestly... What difference is there between Bush and Clinton aside from the fact Bush at least comes right out and tells everyone he's a Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. Yes. Twice the chance, perhaps. Maybe even three times. Heck, maybe even a hundred times.
Multiply zero all you like, and you still end up with zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. They can throw their support to a candidate
and end this race. She can still be the recipient of their support. But what if they decide to back Obama in June? What is she going to say? "I am sticking around just in case you morons change your minds at the convention?" Come on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. And members of the electoral college don't vote until well after the first week in November...
What's your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
44. Nobody votes till the convention - GREAT isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
52. Umm.... NO delegates vote until the convention.... never have....

And yet.... we've had presumptive nominees prior to the convention most years....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. Took the words right outta my mouth.
Duh, he won't be the nominee - but he WILL be the PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE. Just like McCain's not the nominee yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. Correct. Following the OPs train of thought the Repubs don't have a nominee either.
Edited on Wed May-21-08 10:34 PM by kwenu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
58. So that must mean that we don't have a nominee - but - all the pundits say we do.
Guess the pundits are full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. By that reasoning, the GOP doesn't have a nominee yet either...


*NO* delegates vote until the convention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
60. Yeah, but they can PLEDGE. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
61. neither do pledged delegates
so who do you think all those delegates at the Republican Convention are voting for.


To pretend that we cannot understand what a delegate is going to do until the actually vote is infantile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
68. SHE IS NOT GOING TO BE THE NOMINEE.
Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
69. Really? Nice call.
Care to go over all the rules? There are thousands that apply here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
71. Ahem, excuse me.....
Hilliary lost, please come back to reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
72. Nor do "regular" delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC