|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:19 PM Original message |
Ahem, excuse me..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. Don't worry, Hillary will concede soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. not officially, but they can disclose who they intend to vote for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
3. Was there another conference call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. McAuliffe was saying that on the Teevee today. Now they've all picked it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Ah the great leader's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. really, I didn't hear him say that, but I work during the day. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. I'm sure you picked up the daily talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
34. Yes, the Independent Freethinking 'bots always claim they've never heard anyone else say it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:53 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Wonder what tommorow brings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 07:34 AM Response to Reply #21 |
65. OOoooohh! The "Get a job, hippies!" shout-back. You know who else uses that? (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wileedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
4. Ahem... Popular vote doesn't count at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted sub-thread |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
6. The Nile is the only major river that runs south to north. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. Denial is the only major .... oh... nevermind..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
37. wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:50 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. I knew there would a disputatious wise acre out there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:30 PM Response to Reply #38 |
55. ahem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconicgnom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #55 |
63. sounds major lazy to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 06:44 AM Response to Reply #55 |
64. Everything in gd:p is a fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #64 |
70. how dare you throw my river under the bus (boat?)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:22 PM Original message |
Ahem, Hillary signed the same pledge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
7. It's over for Clinton... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
8. then the primaries don't count, the caucuses don't count, because the pledged delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. These are endorsements not votes. delegates are apportioned according to votes. The super D's have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Clinton said the pledged delegates really aren't pledged. She's hoping at the convention the pledged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. some are and some are not. and the ones that are, are only so on the first ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. Pledged delegates can do whatever they want whenever they want, really. Your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
39. she`s reminds me of the woman in the "taxi scene" from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Neither have the pledged D's. Your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. what is a convention for. the process is obviously not over, get it now? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
30. At 2025, it's over. There's nothing more Hillary can do. She can stomp her feet and refuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky 13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
9. But why would you WANT this to go on that long? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorktv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
36. why do we lose? Are we going to lose Congress too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky 13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Previous primaries that have gone to convention result in a LOSS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorktv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #42 |
51. 1912 belies what you just said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky 13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 12:27 PM Response to Reply #51 |
66. Really? What about 1980? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #51 |
67. 1912? 1912??? Did you really just say 1912? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
12. nothing counts until the convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
13. Neither do pledged delegates. Your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. so what is a convention for? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Plenty of things. Show of party unity, creation of a platform, nomination of a candidate. What do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:39 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. good, now you get it. this is to close, it is not your normal primary where some one has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. It is not 'to close' at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:57 PM Response to Reply #31 |
45. Ted Kennedy took it to the convention with WAY less delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. What happened to the party that year? Refresh my memory. We won, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Nope. Obama will have long reached 2025. Hillary can claim she's in it all she wants, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wileedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. Close has nothing to do with anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
62. close? CLOSE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. It is supposed to be the TV Kick Off Event for the fall campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avenger64 (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
23. Good point, and they can change their 'endorsments' from one ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meshuga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
35. If that is the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avenger64 (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. I'd say Clinton stands a quite better chance than Edwards, wouldn't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meshuga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. They stand the same chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avenger64 (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:00 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. "none?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:06 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Evidentially, not politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avenger64 (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Well, I think Senator Clinton seems to understand them ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. And where, exactly, did you get that perception? From her deft guiding of her campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avenger64 (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Well, she's a U.S. Senator, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueCaliDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #54 |
73. She only has a "lead" in the popular vote if you count the by her, discounted votes of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:00 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. Yes. Twice the chance, perhaps. Maybe even three times. Heck, maybe even a hundred times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meshuga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
24. They can throw their support to a candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
29. And members of the electoral college don't vote until well after the first week in November... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
44. Nobody votes till the convention - GREAT isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
52. Umm.... NO delegates vote until the convention.... never have.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:32 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Took the words right outta my mouth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwenu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:33 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. Correct. Following the OPs train of thought the Repubs don't have a nominee either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
58. So that must mean that we don't have a nominee - but - all the pundits say we do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. By that reasoning, the GOP doesn't have a nominee yet either... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
60. Yeah, but they can PLEDGE. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
61. neither do pledged delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
68. SHE IS NOT GOING TO BE THE NOMINEE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
69. Really? Nice call. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
71. Ahem, excuse me..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-22-08 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
72. Nor do "regular" delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 01:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC